Solving Linear Transformations in R2 and R3

  • Thread starter Thread starter dlevanchuk
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving linear transformations from R2 to R3, specifically the transformation T defined by T(e1) = u1 and T(e2) = u2, where u1 = [1; 0; -1] and u2 = [2; 1; 0]. The transformation matrix A is represented as B = [1 2; 0 1; -1 0]. The user successfully computes T([1; 1]) and T([2; -1]) using matrix multiplication, yielding T([1; 1]) = [3; 1; -1]. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between basis vectors and their transformation under linear mappings.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear transformations in vector spaces
  • Familiarity with matrix multiplication
  • Knowledge of basis vectors in R2 and R3
  • Concept of matrix representation of linear transformations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of linear transformations in Rn
  • Learn about the Rank-Nullity Theorem in linear algebra
  • Explore the concept of eigenvalues and eigenvectors
  • Investigate applications of linear transformations in computer graphics
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in linear algebra, mathematicians, and anyone interested in understanding the mechanics of linear transformations between different vector spaces.

dlevanchuk
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
What have I done?

Homework Statement


(linear transformation)
Let T: R2 -> R3 be a linear transformation such that T(e1) = u1 and T(e2) = u2, where u1 = [1; 0; -1] and u2 = [2; 1; 0]. Find each of the following:
T([1; 1]) and T([2; -1])

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Here is the thing. I've been sitting with this problem for a good hour, and cannot figure out. I just started playing around with numbers, toss em around a little bit, and in the end I've got the correct answer... But can somebody explain me, WHY is this the right way of doing it?? lol

First, I looked at u1 and u2 as a matrix A = [1 2; 0 1; -1 0]. Then i did a familiar A*e1 = b1 and A*e2 = b2, where I got b1= [1; 0; -1] and b2 = [2; 1; 0].. (thinking out loud, every matrix multiplication is a transformation, so it must be relating somehow..)

I let b1 and b2 be matrix (i call it transformation matrix) B = [1 2; 0 1; -1 0]

then I decided to multiply this transformation matrix B by a vector that needs to be transformed from R2 to R3 [1; 1] and got
[1 2; 0 1; -1 0] * [1; 1] = [3; 1; -1]

By why in the name of Albert did it work?? lol did I have a correct logic through out the problem??
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Yes. If T is a linear transformation on vector space V, and \{e_1, e_2, ..., e_n\} is a basis for V, then the matrix representation of T, relative to this basis (and, if the range space is different, a specific basis for the range) just has T(e_1), T(e_2), etc. as columns.

To see why that is true, remember that we would always have e_1= 1e_1+ 0e_2+ ...+ 0e_n so in matrix multiplication, it would be represented by the column matrix \begin{bmatrix}1 \\ 0 \\ 0 \\ ... \\ 0\end{bmatrix}. Multiplying any matrix by that just gives the first column of the matrix. Similarly, e_2 would be represented by \begin{bmatrix}0 \\ 1\\ 0 \\...\\0\end{bmatrix}.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K