Solving Oblique Triangles w/o Law of Sines/Cosines

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter KC60523
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Triangles
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving an oblique triangle with limited information, specifically when the Law of Sines and the Law of Cosines appear to be inadequate or yield non-real solutions. Participants explore alternative methods to find missing sides or angles based on the given variables.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in using the Law of Sines and Law of Cosines due to the obtuse angle and limited information, seeking alternative methods to solve for the triangle's dimensions.
  • Another participant asserts that the Law of Sines can be applied to obtuse angles and suggests that knowing the values of sides a and b along with angle θ2 should allow for a solution, albeit through multiple steps.
  • A different participant questions the initial claim about the Law of Sines, providing a formula involving angle θ3 and suggesting that the Law of Cosines can also be used to find the last side and angle.
  • One participant advocates for using the Law of Cosines as the first step to find the third side, arguing that it should not fail and that if it results in a non-real answer, it indicates a potential issue with the triangle's dimensions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of the Law of Sines and Law of Cosines in this context. There is no consensus on the best approach to solve the triangle, with multiple competing methods and interpretations presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific angles and sides without providing complete numerical values or diagrams, which may limit the clarity of their arguments. The discussion includes assumptions about the triangle's existence based on the given dimensions.

KC60523
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I need help solving for any other information about the red triangle. Due to the extremely limited information I already have, I can't use the Law of Sines (the angle is obtuse) or the Law of Cosines (gives no solution or non-real solutions for the information given) like I normally would. I only know the variables listed in the diagram. Is there any other way to get either the missing side or the other two angles? It has been a long time since I had geometry, so I'm hoping I'm just forgetting something simple.

Other information: a > b
 

Attachments

  • Slide1.jpg
    Slide1.jpg
    10.2 KB · Views: 519
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Why can't you use Law of Sine? If you are naming top angle (to right) for \theta_3then ,
\frac{\sin(\theta_3)}{a}=\frac{\sin(\theta_2)}{b}
and the last angle
\theta_4=180^o-(\theta_2+\theta_3)
and finally the last side:
c^2=a^2+b^2-2ab\cos(\theta_4)
 
For me, using the Law of Cosines to get the third side is the obvious first step. I don't see why it should fail. It may give you two answers because this is the ambiguous case, but you just choose the one you know is correct.

If it happens that the answer is nonreal, then I think b is too short for the triangle to exist with that angle.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K