Solving ODEs Involving ln: Explained

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving ordinary differential equations (ODEs) that involve the natural logarithm function, specifically focusing on the manipulation of logarithmic and exponential forms in equations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of moving the natural logarithm to the right-hand side of an equation and question the nature of constants involved, particularly regarding the exponential function and its representation as a constant.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with participants offering insights into the properties of logarithms and exponentials. Some have provided clarifications on the inverse relationships, while others are still seeking to understand the reasoning behind multiple exponential terms in the equation.

Contextual Notes

There appears to be some confusion regarding the notation and the manipulation of terms, particularly in the context of constants and their representations. Participants are also questioning the assumptions made in the problem setup.

Ry122
Messages
563
Reaction score
2
I don't understand what is happening in the following problem.
What happens to ln when it moves to the RHS?
Why are there two exponential functions on the RHS and why is e^c made to equal A?
http://users.on.net/~rohanlal/mathproblemln.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
c is a constant, so what does that make [tex]e^c[/tex]? Isn't that just some other number? Couldn't you just call that other number A? Also I do not see 2 exponential functions, I only see one...
 
ln doesn't "move" to the right hand side! You should have learned not to use "baby" language like that long ago. If you have an operation on the left side of an equation that you want to eliminate, you do the opposite or inverse operation:
1) if 2 is added to, the inverse of "add 2" is "subtract 2": x+2= 1 becomes x+ 2- 2= 1- 2 or x= -1.
2) if 3 is multiplied by x, the inverse of "multiply by 3 is "divide by 3": 3x= 1 becomes (3x)/3= 1/3 or x= 1/3.

3) If the problem is ln(x)= 1, you do the inverse of ln. What is the inverse of y= ln(x)?
 
What is the inverse of y= ln(x)?

e to the power of c i'd assume.But still that leaves the question of why there is a 2nd e
and why it is raised to the power of all of the terms that were initially on the RHS.
 
Yes, the inverse of y= ln(x) is y= ex (not "c").

So if ln(x)= a, what is x?
 
well a=e^x
so therefore aloge=x
but that still doesn't answer my question
 
Maybe this will clarify things:

[tex]e^{\frac{t^2}{2}+2t+c}=e^{c}e^{\frac{t^2}{2}+2t}=Ae^{\frac{t^2}{2}+2t}[/tex]

where I used that [tex]e^{a+b}=e^ae^b[/tex] and [tex]A=e^c[/tex] by definition.
 
why doesn't the resulting equation
look like Ae*(1/2)*(t^2)+2t
rather than Ae^(1/2)*(t^2)+2t
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K