Solving Orbital Speed with Energy & Angular Momentum Conservation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving orbital speed using conservation of energy and angular momentum principles in a circular orbit scenario. The user successfully derived the equation for orbital speed, $$v^2 = \frac{k}{m}a^2$$, but encountered issues when incorporating impulse and energy conservation. The final expression for radius, $$r^2 = \frac{3a^2 \pm \sqrt{9a^4 - 4a^4(1 + \cos(\alpha))^2}}{2}$$, presented complications due to a negative term under the square root. The user was advised to reconsider the application of impulse and its effect on kinetic energy, leading to a clearer understanding of the conservation laws post-impulse.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics, specifically conservation of energy and angular momentum.
  • Familiarity with circular motion dynamics and centripetal force equations.
  • Knowledge of impulse-momentum theorem and its application in physics.
  • Proficiency in mathematical manipulation of equations involving square roots and trigonometric functions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the impulse-momentum theorem in circular motion scenarios.
  • Learn about the derivation of centripetal force from potential energy functions.
  • Explore the relationship between kinetic energy and momentum in dynamic systems.
  • Investigate the conditions under which energy conservation holds in non-conservative systems.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focused on mechanics, orbital dynamics, and energy conservation principles. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of the interplay between impulse, energy, and angular momentum in circular motion.

Kyuubi
Messages
18
Reaction score
8
Homework Statement
A particle of mass m moves under the action of a harmonic oscillator force with potential energy 1
2kr2. Initially, it is moving in a circle of radius a. Find the orbital speed v. It is then given a blow of impulse mv in a direction making an angle α with its original velocity. Use the conservation laws to determine the minimum and maximum distances from the origin during the subsequent motion. Explain your results physically for the two limiting cases α = 0 and α = π.
Relevant Equations
Conservation of angular momentum and Conservation of Energy
$$J= const$$ and $$E = const$$
I've already solved the orbital speed by equating the kinetic and potential energy in the circle orbit case.

$$\frac{1}{2}mv^2 = \frac{1}{2}ka^2.$$And so $$v^2 = \frac{k}{m}a^2$$Now when the impulse is added, the particle will obviously change course. If we set our reference point in time just after the impulse is added. We get back our Angular momentum and Energy Conservation.So,

$$Ei = Ef$$

$$\frac{1}{2}mv^2 + \frac{p^2}{2m} + \frac{1}{2}ka^2 = \frac{1}{2}mv'^2 + \frac{1}{2}kr^2$$where v' is the final velocity, and r is new extension of spring.
$$Ji = Jf$$ also gives
$$mva + mvacos(\alpha) = mv'r$$Now we can solve for v' then plug that in the Energy conservation. I will also substitute in the value for v.$$\frac{1}{2}ka^2 + \frac{1}{2}ka^2 + \frac{1}{2}ka^2 =\frac{ma^2v^2(1+cos(\alpha))^2}{2r^2} + \frac{1}{2}kr^2$$Dividing out the $\frac{1}{2}$s and Ks. Then multiplying both sides by $r^2$ we get something like:$$r^4 - 3a^2r^2 + a^4(1+cos(\alpha))^2=0$$which finally gives$$r^2 = \frac{3a^2\pm\sqrt{9a^4-4a^4(1+cos(\alpha))^2}}{2}$$
This is problematic since the term in the root becomes negative, at least for $(\alpha) = 0.$The answer in the book is:$$r^2 = \frac{1}{2}a^2(3+2cos(\alpha) \pm \sqrt{5+4cos(\alpha)}$$I tried solving the problem using the ##\frac{J^2}{2mr^2}## term instead of the ##\frac{p^2}{2m}## term in energy conservation but to no avail.Any help would be appreciated.

Edit. This is my first time using latex. Idk why the last two terms are weird here, they look fine on overleaf. Please excuse an strange looking things.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Kyuubi said:
$$\frac{1}{2}mv^2 = \frac{1}{2}ka^2.$$
Why is this true? How does it ensure that the mass is going around in a circle? All you know for the circular motion is that $$\frac{1}{2}mv^2 + \frac{1}{2}ka^2=E_0=\text{constant}.$$ Why do you say that energy and angular momentum are conserved before and after the impulse is delivered? Suppose the mass is initially at rest and has zero mechanical energy. When you give it an impulse ##J## it starts moving while stretching the spring. That says to me that the mechanical energy is no longer zero. So in what sense is energy conserved? Same with angular momentum.

You need to rethink this.
 
kuruman said:
Why is this true? How does it ensure that the mass is going around in a circle? All you know for the circular motion is that $$\frac{1}{2}mv^2 + \frac{1}{2}ka^2=E_0=\text{constant}.$$ Why do you say that energy and angular momentum are conserved before and after the impulse is delivered? Suppose the mass is initially at rest and has zero mechanical energy. When you give it an impulse ##J## it starts moving while stretching the spring. That says to me that the mechanical energy is no longer zero. So in what sense is energy conserved? Same with angular momentum.

You need to rethink this.
Ok tbf I had two methods to reach the orbital speed. This was one of them, but like you are saying it feels weird. My other reason for my velocity term is that the potential energy function corresponds to the centripetal force ##F(r) = -kr## which can be equated to ##\frac{mv^2}{r}##.
Plugging in r = a, you'll get the orbital speed expression. But again, this is not where I'm hung up on.
 
kuruman said:
Why is this true? How does it ensure that the mass is going around in a circle? All you know for the circular motion is that $$\frac{1}{2}mv^2 + \frac{1}{2}ka^2=E_0=\text{constant}.$$ Why do you say that energy and angular momentum are conserved before and after the impulse is delivered? Suppose the mass is initially at rest and has zero mechanical energy. When you give it an impulse ##J## it starts moving while stretching the spring. That says to me that the mechanical energy is no longer zero. So in what sense is energy conserved? Same with angular momentum.

You need to rethink this.
Sorry for the double reply, but I didn't address your other point.
I'm not saying that Energy and momentum are conserved before and after the impulse is delivered. I'm saying if we think of the system right *after* the impulse is delivered, then conservation holds. Say if the impulse is delivered at t = 0, then at t=0.00000000...01 and at t = inf. Conservation holds. It's as if I'm looking at a new system entirely.
 
Kyuubi said:
Ok tbf I had two methods to reach the orbital speed. This was one of them, but like you are saying it feels weird. My other reason for my velocity term is that the potential energy function corresponds to the centripetal force ##F(r) = -kr## which can be equated to ##\frac{mv^2}{r}##.
Plugging in r = a, you'll get the orbital speed expression. But again, this is not where I'm hung up on.
The correct argument is the centripetal force argument because it works for circular orbits regardless of the dependence of the central force on ##r##.

I'll get you started here. From the impulse equation ##\Delta\vec v=\dfrac{\vec J}{m}.## Now consider that the impulse is delivered when the mass is at position ##\vec r=\{a,0\}##. The velocity before the impulse at that moment is ##\vec v=\{0,a\sqrt{k/m}\}=\{0,a\omega\}.##

Let ##t=0## be the time immediately after the impulse is delivered.

Question 1: What are the initial conditions (velocity and position) at time ##t=0##?
Question 2: What is the general expression for the position vector ##\vec r(t)## after the impulse is delivered?
Question 3: What is the particular expression for ##\vec r(t)## that satisfies the initial conditions?

Once you answer Question 3 correctly, you will have everything you need.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kyuubi
Kyuubi said:
So,

$$Ei = Ef$$

$$\frac{1}{2}mv^2 + \frac{p^2}{2m} + \frac{1}{2}ka^2 = \frac{1}{2}mv'^2 + \frac{1}{2}kr^2$$
From the second term on the left side, it looks like you assumed that the impulse adds the amount ##\frac{p^2}{2m}## to the kinetic energy. This isn't correct.

Think about how much the impulse will increase the tangential and radial components of velocity. Then you can work out an expression for the total kinetic energy just after the impulse.

Otherwise, your approach to the problem looks good to me.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kyuubi
TSny said:
From the second term on the left side, it looks like you assumed that the impulse adds the amount ##\frac{p^2}{2m}## to the kinetic energy. This isn't correct.

Think about how much the impulse will increase the tangential and radial components of velocity. Then you can work out an expression for the total kinetic energy just after the impulse.

Otherwise, your approach to the problem looks good to me.
Thank you so much! This is exactly what I needed, and I got the right answer. I see now that I shouldn't plug in the momentum into the Energy conservation, but rather I should see the resultant change in energy from the applied momentum and use that instead.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TSny
dobirama said:
Please, can you show the final resolution of your system step by step?
That's not how this forum works. Read the guidelines.
Please start a new thread, filling in the homework template and showing your own attempt.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
965
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
879
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
985
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
335
Views
16K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
1K