- 15,893
- 9,059
I can't read that. There are too many erasures. Can you type it up, please?
The discussion revolves around calculating the energy of a photon with a wavelength of 820 nm and exploring related questions about photon interactions and heat transfer in the context of igniting paper. The subject area includes concepts from quantum physics and thermodynamics.
The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing interpretations and suggestions for equations to use. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need to consider the temperature change of the paper and the significance of the energy values calculated. There is a lack of consensus on the correct approach to connect the energy calculations to the ignition question.
Participants note the absence of certain information, such as the distance through which photons travel and the specific units of the absorption coefficient. The problem consists of multiple interconnected questions, which adds complexity to the discussion.
- N(inter)=5.6x10^18 x 180 x (1-e^(-0.32x0.1x10^-3)) = 1.03x10^13 photonskuruman said:I can't read that. There are too many erasures. Can you type it up, please?
This number is too low by several orders of magnitude. The left-hand side is OK, the right-hand side is not. You must have made a mistake somewhere.meher4real said:- N(inter)=5.6x10^18 x 180 x (1-e^(-0.32x0.1x10^-3)) = 1.03x10^13 photons
i used the thickness of the paper which is 0.1 mm ?! you said that is 1 mm can you explain why ?kuruman said:This number is too low by several orders of magnitude. The left-hand side is OK, the right-hand side is not. You must have made a mistake somewhere.
The rest is ok ?kuruman said:You used the correct thickness of the paper 0.1 mm as given by the problem. What I am saying is that 5.6x10^18 x 180 x (1-e^(-0.32x0.1x10^-3)) is NOT 1.03x10^13. You need to redo this calculation correctly.
No, the rest is not Ok. Cut a piece of paper into a square of side 1 cm. Do you really believe it weighs 80 grams or 80x10^-3kg?meher4real said:The rest is ok ?
g to kg isn't 10^-3 ?kuruman said:No, the rest is not Ok. Cut a piece of paper into a square of side 1 cm. Do you really believe it weighs 80 grams or 80x10^-3kg?
- N(inter)=5.6x10^18 x 180 x (1-e^(-(0.32x0.1x10^-3)) = 3.23x10^16 photonskuruman said:You used the correct thickness of the paper 0.1 mm as given by the problem. What I am saying is that 5.6x10^18 x 180 x (1-e^(-0.32x0.1x10^-3)) is NOT 1.03x10^13. You need to redo this calculation correctly.
I agree with those numbers. Now what?meher4real said:g to kg isn't 10^-3 ?
- N(inter)=5.6x10^18 x 180 x (1-e^(-(0.32x0.1x10^-3)) = 3.23x10^16 photons
- E(abs) = N(inter)xE(photon)
= 7.8 x 10^-3 J
What's wrong with weight 80x10^-3kg ?kuruman said:I agree with those numbers. Now what?
weight x 1 cm^2 ?kuruman said:A standard, letter-sized 8.5"×11", sheet of paper weighs 4 to 5 grams. Do you really believe that if you cut a square piece 1 cm on the side out of that sheet, it will weigh 80 grams?![]()
The whole sheet of paper is 4 grams. If you cut a piece of that paper any size, any shape, can it weigh 20 times as much as the entire sheet? Think!meher4real said:weight x 1 cm^2 ?
huh you're right, weight/1cm^2kuruman said:The whole sheet of paper is 4 grams. If you cut a piece of that paper any size, any shape, can it weigh 20 times as much as the entire sheet? Think!
I found Energy required to heat paper = 0.40 Jkuruman said:So what is the mass of 1 cm2 of paper? Read carefully and understand what you are given.
I didn't ask you what energy is required to heat the paper and I didn't ask you for the number of photons required. I asked you to find the correct mass of the paper that is heated up. You have repeatedly avoided answering my questions which I am only asking to guide your thinking. Your refusal to answer them indicates to me that you reject my help. If that's the case, I will stop helping you.meher4real said:I found Energy required to heat paper = 0.40 J
number of photons required = 1.612x10^18 photons
Not at all !kuruman said:I didn't ask you what energy is required to heat the paper and I didn't ask you for the number of photons required. I asked you to find the correct mass of the paper that is heated up. You have repeatedly avoided answering my questions which I am only asking to guide your thinking. Your refusal to answer them indicates to me that you reject my help. If that's the case, I will stop helping you.