Solving Polar Co-ordinate Paradox: Finding \frac {\partial r} {\partial x}

  • Thread starter Thread starter dirtydog
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paradox
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of the partial derivative \(\frac {\partial r} {\partial x}\) in polar coordinates, specifically addressing the confusion arising from treating \(\theta\) as a constant. The correct derivation shows that \(\frac {\partial r} {\partial x} = \cos \theta\) when derived from \(r^2 = x^2 + z^2\). However, when using \(x = r \cos \theta\), \(\theta\) must be treated as a variable dependent on \(x\), leading to \(\frac {\partial r} {\partial x} = \frac {1}{\cos \theta}\) being incorrect without considering the chain rule. The key takeaway is the necessity of applying the quotient rule and recognizing the dependency of \(\theta\) on \(x\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polar coordinates and their relationships
  • Familiarity with partial derivatives and differentiation techniques
  • Knowledge of the chain rule and quotient rule in calculus
  • Ability to manipulate trigonometric identities in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the chain rule in multivariable calculus
  • Learn about the quotient rule and its implications in differentiation
  • Explore the relationship between polar and Cartesian coordinates in depth
  • Practice solving partial derivatives involving trigonometric functions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are working with polar coordinates and need to understand the nuances of differentiation in multivariable contexts.

dirtydog
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi I am having a bit of difficulty working with plane polar co-ordinates.
We have:
r^2 = x^2 + z^2
x = r cos \theta
z=r sin \theta
I wish to find \frac {\partial r} {\partial x}

Using r^2 = x^2 + z^2
We have:

\frac {\partial (r^2)} {\partial x} = \frac {\partial (x^2)} {\partial x} + \frac {\partial (z^2)} {\partial x}
Thus 2r\frac {\partial r} {\partial x} = 2x
\frac {\partial r} {\partial x} = \frac {x} {r} = \frac {r cos \theta} {r}
Therefore \frac {\partial r} {\partial x} = cos \theta

But if we find \frac {\partial r} {\partial x} using x = r cos \theta
We have:
r = \frac {x} {cos \theta}
Therefore \frac {\partial r} {\partial x} = \frac {1} {cos \theta}

What is going on here? Which answer is wrong and why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ooops! In your last step you \theta is NOT a constant! You need to differentiate it wrt x as well.
 
dirtydog said:
But if we find \frac {\partial r} {\partial x} using x = r cos \theta
We have:
r = \frac {x} {cos \theta}
Therefore \frac {\partial r} {\partial x} = \frac {1} {cos \theta}

Hi, when you differentiated with respect to x here, you treated \theta as a constant. It's not, it's dependent on x, so you have to use the quotient rule and you'll have a \frac {\partial \theta} {\partial x} appear via the chain rule. Use {\cos \theta}=\frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2+z^2}} to work out \frac {\partial \theta} {\partial x}.

eidt-Tide was quicker on the draw!
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure, but I think your mistake is in the following procedure:

r = \frac {x} {cos \theta} \rightarrow \frac {\partial r} {\partial x} = \frac {1} {cos \theta}

I believe that \theta is dependent on x. In other words \theta = \theta (x) so you can't just treat cos \theta as a constant when taking the derivative with respect to x.
 
Whoops! I guess I'm pretty late on that one!

This is the first time I used the equation formatting and it took me a while to format the post. (ha ha)

At least, I know now that I was on the right track. :smile:
 
Way to go, NS!
 
Thanks for your help guys!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K