MHB Solving quadratic equation problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving two mathematical problems involving a quadratic equation and a geometry question about a plowed strip around a rectangular field. The first problem's solution was initially incorrect, but after review, the correct expression for x was identified as x = y + 2 ± 2√(y² + y + 1). The second problem required setting up the equation to find the width of the strip, with the correct approach being to equate the area of the unplowed portion to one-third of the total area. The final width of the strip was confirmed to be approximately 15.51m, with an exact answer provided as w = 10(4 - √6).
paulmdrdo1
Messages
382
Reaction score
0
please check my answers if they are correct. these problems are even numbered probs in my books that's why I need somebody to check it.

1. solve for x in terms of other symbols

$x^2-2xy-4x-3y^2=0$

using the quadratic formula I get

$x=y+2\pm4\sqrt{y^2+y+1}$

2. what is the width of a strip that must be plowed around a rectangular field 100m long by 60m long wide so that the field will be two-thirds plowed?

let $w=$width around the strip

$60-2w =$ width of the strip
$100-2w =$ length of the strip

so,

$(60-2w)(100-2w)=\frac{2}{3}\times(60)(100)$

the width of the strip is approx. 46.33m

thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
1.) Check the coefficient of the radical.

2.) You have set the problem up incorrectly, and even so obtained the wrong solution to what you set up. You want the inner rectangle, which represents the unplowed portion, to be 1/3 of the total.
 
yes, I found my mistake in first problem.

the answer should be $x=y+2\pm2\sqrt{y^2+y+1}$

but in the 2nd how do I set up the problem?
 
Set it up very similarly to what you did, only equate the inner rectangle to 1/3 of the total rather than 2/3. Do you see why?
 
let $w=$width of the strip

$60-2w =$ width of the inner rectangle
$100-2w =$ length of the inner rectangle

$(60-2w)(100-2w)=$ area of the inner rectangle(unplowed portion)

so,

$(60-2w)(100-2w)=\frac{1}{3}\times(60)(100)$

$w=15.51m$

is my solution and answer now correct?
 
Yes, your result is accurate to two decimal places. Unless the instructions were to give an approximate answer, I would give the exact answer:

$$w=10\left(4-\sqrt{6}\right)$$
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top