I Solving Schrodinger's eqn using ladder operators for potential V

Hamiltonian
Messages
296
Reaction score
193
The Schrodinger equation:
$$-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2} + \hat V\psi = E\psi$$
$$\frac{1}{2m}[\hat p^2 + 2m\hat V ]\psi = E\psi$$
The ladder operators:
$$\hat a_\pm = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2m}}[\hat p \pm i\sqrt{2m\hat V}]$$

$$\hat a_\pm \hat a_\mp = \frac{1}{2m}[\hat p^2 + (2m\hat V) \mp i\sqrt{2m}[\hat p,\hat V ^{1/2}]]$$
The Hamiltonian:
$$\hat H = \frac{1}{2m}[\hat p^2 +2m\hat V]$$
The Hamiltonian in terms of the ladder operator:
$$\hat H = \hat a_\pm \hat a_\mp \pm {\frac{i}{\sqrt{2m}} [\hat p, \hat V^{1/2}]} $$
finding ##\hat H(\hat a_- \psi)##:
$$\hat H(\hat a_- \psi) = [\hat a_-\hat a_+ \frac{i}{\sqrt{2m}}[\hat p, \hat V^{1/2}]](\hat a_- \psi)$$
$$\hat H(\hat a_- \psi) = \hat a_-[E - \frac{2i}{\sqrt{2m}}[\hat p, \hat V^{1/2}]](\psi)$$

If we apply the lowering operator repeatedly we will eventually reach a state with energy less than zero, which do not exist.
$$\hat a_- \psi_0 = 0$$
$$[\hat p - i(2m\hat V)^{1/2}]\psi_0 = 0$$
$$[-i\hbar\frac{d}{dx} -i \sqrt{2mV(x)}]\psi_0 = 0$$
$$\psi_0(x) = -\int {\frac{\sqrt{2mV(x)}}{\hbar}dx}$$
$$\psi_n(x) = A_n(\hat a_+)^n \psi_0(x)$$
where ##\psi_0## is the ground state wave function solution.
Is this a correct way to give a general solution of the Schrodinger equation for any potential?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hamiltonian299792458 said:
Is this a correct way to give a general solution of the Schrodinger equation for any potential?
You can quickly check whether you have a general solution by trying it on the special case ##V=0##. Try this and you’ll likely see that the harmonic oscillator potential has a property required for this approach to work that is not found in more general potentials.
 
  • Like
Likes gentzen, Demystifier and BvU
Hamiltonian299792458 said:
$$\psi_0(x) = -\int {\frac{\sqrt{2mV(x)}}{\hbar}dx}$$
$$\psi_n(x) = A_n(\hat a_+)^n \psi_0(x)$$
where ##\psi_0## is the ground state wave function solution.
Is this a correct way to give a general solution of the Schrodinger equation for any potential?
I made a small error here, ##\psi_0## is supposed to be:
$$\psi_0(x) = e^{\int -\frac{\sqrt{2mV(x)}}{\hbar} dx}$$
Nugatory said:
You can quickly check whether you have a general solution by trying it on the special case ##V=0##. Try this and you’ll likely see that the harmonic oscillator potential has a property required for this approach to work that is not found in more general potentials.
Is there a way to account for the case where ##V(x) = 0##?
Leaving aside this case the final siltion should hold true for any arbitrary potential ##V(x)##?
 
The "lowering operators" do not really lower energy. Instead, they multiply ##\psi(x)## by a function that depends on ##x## (except in the cases ##V=0## and ##V\propto x^2##), so it cannot be interpreted as a number times ##\psi(x)## .
 
This technique is pretty much restricted to the harmonic oscillator and the angular-momentum eigenvalue problems, and the latter is even also reducible to the symmetric harmonic-oscillator problem in 2 dimensions. So one can expect that most of the problems, where this "factorization of the Hamiltonian" approach works, is due to symmetries reducing to the harmonic oscillators in ##d## dimensions and thus related to the Lie algebras of the SU(d) groups. Schrödinger has written (at least) two papers about this too:

https://www.jstor.org/stable/20490744
https://www.jstor.org/stable/20490756
 
  • Like
Likes BvU and Hamiltonian
I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Back
Top