Solving Sequence: Prove Decreasing with n

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dextercioby
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequence
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the sequence defined by \( a_n = n \tan\frac{\pi}{n} \) is decreasing for \( n \geq 3 \). Participants explore various methods to establish this property, including trigonometric identities, inequalities, and derivative analysis, while also considering related sequences like \( a_n = n \sin\frac{1}{n} \).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks help to show that \( a_n = n \tan\frac{\pi}{n} \) is decreasing as \( n \) increases.
  • Another suggests using the Taylor series expansion of \( \tan x \) to analyze the sequence.
  • A different participant proposes a first principles approach, focusing on the negative derivative of the tangent function for \( x > 0 \) to argue for the sequence's monotonicity.
  • Some participants express doubt about proving the sequence's behavior using only trigonometric identities, suggesting that derivatives might be necessary.
  • One participant shifts focus to proving that \( a_n = n \sin\frac{1}{n} \) increases with \( n \), proposing to compare the rates of increase and decrease of \( n \) and \( \sin(1/n) \).
  • Another participant attempts to derive inequalities involving sine and cotangent to establish the monotonicity of the sequence but expresses uncertainty about the validity of their approach.
  • Several participants engage in manipulating inequalities and identities to support their arguments, with one expressing appreciation for another's insight into the problem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the methods to prove the decreasing nature of the sequence or the increasing nature of the related sequence. Multiple competing views and approaches are presented, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the challenge of proving the properties of the sequences using only elementary trigonometric identities, while others rely on derivative analysis, indicating a divergence in approaches. There are also mentions of specific inequalities that require further validation.

dextercioby
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
13,409
Reaction score
4,201
So I was trying to show that

[tex]a_n = n \tan\frac{\pi}{n}[/tex]

is decreasing as n increases (n>=3) . I can't see it. Anyone may help ? :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tan x = x + 1/3x3 + 2/15x5 + 17/315x7 + ...for |x| < π/2, so expand an and subtract from it an+1 and you should see this
 
I was aiming at a method from first principles (tangent is the ratio of sine and cosine), without derivatives, because I know that I can take n from N (>=3) to the real subset [3,infty) and analyze the sign of the first derivative of the function. It's negative for x>0, hence the function keeps decreasing as x increases. Then the monotonicity of the sequence follows.

Your definition of tangent needs to be proven equivalent to the triangle one.
 
I tried the tangent difference identities and such but it does not help. I think it is best to use the sine-tangent inequality to evaluate the derivative of sine and cosine, and then using them to evaluate the derivative of tangent. I doubt there is any better way using elementary means.
 
Going further, the proof I'm searching reduces to show that once [itex]\displaystyle{n\in \mathbb{N}}[/itex], the sequence

[tex]a_n = n \sin\frac{1}{n}[/tex]

increases with n.

How do I prove it ?
 
dextercioby said:
Going further, the proof I'm searching reduces to show that once [itex]\displaystyle{n\in \mathbb{N}}[/itex], the sequence

[tex]a_n = n \sin\frac{1}{n}[/tex]

increases with n.

How do I prove it ?

I'm not sure about this, but here's what I thought.

You can try seeing whether n increases faster than sin(1/n) decreases, by taking their derivatives(or some other method). You'll reach to the conclusion that n does increase at a faster rate than sin(1/n) decreases, hence, your original function increases.
 
I think you did not understand his point. We can easily differentiate the function and conclude that it increases everywhere because it has a positive derivative. He wants a proof that includes only trigonometric identities, and I am sceptic about whether it is possible to present such a proof.

I think that the first thing to do would be to express one of the sines in terms of the other one. To do this, I used this course of action:
[tex]\frac{1}{n}-\frac{1}{n+1}=\frac{1}{n(n+1)}[/tex]
Then, I conclude that [itex]\frac{1}{n+1}+\frac{1}{n(n+1)}=\frac{1}{n}[/itex]. I now tried to apply this to the sine sum formula as follows:
[tex]\sin\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)=\sin\left(\frac{1}{n+1}+\frac{1}{n(n+1)}\right)[/tex]
[tex]=\sin\left(\frac{1}{n+1}\right)\cos\left(\frac{1}{n(n+1)}\right)+[/tex]
[tex]\cos\left(\frac{1}{n+1}\right)\sin\left(\frac{1}{n(n+1)}\right)[/tex]
I then rearranged this into the inequality
[tex]n\sin\left(\frac{1}{n+1}\right)\cos\left(\frac{1}{n(n+1)}\right)+n\cos\left(\frac{1}{n+1}\right)\sin\left(\frac{1}{n(n+1)}\right) \leq n\sin\left(\frac{1}{n+1}\right)+\sin\left(\frac{1}{n+1}\right)[/tex]
which can be rewritten as
[tex]n\cos\left(\frac{1}{n(n+1)}\right)+n\cot\left(1/(n+1)\right)\sin\left(\frac{1}{n(n+1)}\right)\leq n+1[/tex]
It is straightforward to show that the first term in the LHS is less than or equal to n, so it appears we only need to prove
[tex]\cot\left(\frac{1}{n+1}\right)\sin\left(\frac{1}{n(n+1)}\right)\leq 1/n[/tex]
I am stuck here. This inequality is equivalent to the above function increasing monotonically.

Can anyone carry this on?

Note: After graphing the function using a program, I am convinced that the inequality holds when n is greater than one, and even more: 1/n and this function is asymptotic, their quotient has a limit of one.
 
Last edited:
Millennial said:
[tex]\cot\left(\frac{1}{n+1}\right)\sin\left(\frac{1}{n(n+1)}\right)\leq 1/n[/tex]
I am stuck here. This inequality is equivalent to the above function increasing monotonically.

Can anyone carry this on?

Here's what I did,

We know that sin(x) < x, for all x.

[tex]sin\left ( \frac{1}{n(n+1)} \right ) < \frac{1}{n(n+1)}[/tex]

Substituting in the inequality Millennial had,

[tex]cot\left ( \frac{1}{n+1} \right ) \cdot \frac{1}{n(n+1)} \leq \frac{1}{n} \\<br /> <br /> cot\left ( \frac{1}{n+1} \right ) \cdot \frac{1}{n+1} \leq 1[/tex]Having n>2 it follows that,

[tex]tan\left ( \frac{1}{n+1} \right ) \cdot (n+1) \geq 1[/tex]

We know that tan(x) > x for any x. Hence at the least possible condition, let us assume tan(x) = x. So we get,

[tex]\left ( \frac{1}{n+1} \right )\cdot (n+1) \geq 1[/tex]

Hence the proof.

Please tell me if there is a gap in my logic, as this I've not much practice with such questions :smile:
 
Infinitum said:
Here's what I did,

We know that sin(x) < x, for all x.

[tex]sin\left ( \frac{1}{n(n+1)} \right ) < \frac{1}{n(n+1)}[/tex]

Substituting in the inequality Millennial had,

[tex]cot\left ( \frac{1}{n+1} \right ) \cdot \frac{1}{n(n+1)} \leq \frac{1}{n} \\<br /> <br /> cot\left ( \frac{1}{n+1} \right ) \cdot \frac{1}{n+1} \leq 1[/tex]


Having n>2 it follows that,

[tex]tan\left ( \frac{1}{n+1} \right ) \cdot (n+1) \geq 1[/tex]

We know that tan(x) > x for any x. Hence at the least possible condition, let us assume tan(x) = x. So we get,

[tex]\left ( \frac{1}{n+1} \right )\cdot (n+1) \geq 1[/tex]

Hence the proof.

Please tell me if there is a gap in my logic, as this I've not much practice with such questions :smile:

Yes, that is quite elegant. I did not see that, probably due to me being busy with other questions. Thanks for your help with my proof :)
 
  • #10
Millennial said:
Yes, that is quite elegant. I did not see that, probably due to me being busy with other questions. Thanks for your help with my proof :)

Yay! I was solving some integrals too, this was a fun break :biggrin:

Your method to get that inequality was really insightful. Probably wouldn't ever have thought of manipulating it that way. Thanks for the idea!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K