Solving: Showing Sequence Converges to a Single Point

  • Thread starter Thread starter ak123456
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequence
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a sequence of intervals defined by Jn = [an, bn] that are nested within each other, with the condition that the sequence xn = an - bn converges to 0 as n approaches infinity. The goal is to show that there exists exactly one point a that is contained in all intervals Jn.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the convergence of the sequence xn and its relationship to the endpoints of the intervals. There are questions about proving the existence of a point c that lies within the intervals based on the properties of the sequences involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring the properties of the sequences and their implications for the intervals. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between the point c and the intervals, but confusion remains about the proof and its details.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about their understanding of sequence problems and the nature of the proof required. There is a recognition of the need for clarity regarding the definitions and properties of the sequences involved.

ak123456
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement [/b]
Let Jn : n \inN be a sequence of intervals Jn=\left[an,bn\right] such that J1\supsetJ2\supset...\supsetJn\supsetJn+1\supset...
suppose also that the sequence xn=an-bn converges to 0 as n tends to infinite.Show that there is exactly one point a such that a\inJn for all n \inN


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


i don't know how to start it , any clue??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, I'm dreadfully awful at sequence questions, so take my feedback with a grain of salt. Since the sequence x_n = b_n - a_n converges to zero for arbitrarily large n, this means that \mathrm{inf}(b_n) = \mathrm{sup}(a_n) = c. Can you prove that this number c must always be an element of [a_n,b_n].
 
jgens said:
Well, I'm dreadfully awful at sequence questions, so take my feedback with a grain of salt. Since the sequence x_n = b_n - a_n converges to zero for arbitrarily large n, this means that \mathrm{inf}(b_n) = \mathrm{sup}(a_n) = c. Can you prove that this number c must always be an element of [a_n,b_n].

still confusing
 
The number c would have the property that a_n \leq c \leq b_n for all natural numbers n. What does this tell you about c and its relationship to the interval [a_n,b_n]?

Again, I'm awful at these types of proofs, so if another member says something otherwise, I would follow their feedback (I'm just trying making sure that you actually have some feedback).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K