Proof that a recursive sequence converges

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr Davis 97
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Sequence
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the convergence of the recursive sequence defined by the relation ##t_{n+1} = (1 - \frac{1}{4n^2}) t_n## with an initial condition of ##t_1=1##. Participants explore the properties of the sequence, including its boundedness and monotonicity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants attempt to prove that the sequence is bounded below by 0 and decreasing through induction. Others suggest using iteration to explicitly demonstrate the decreasing nature of the sequence. Questions arise regarding the necessity of the inductive hypothesis in the decreasing proof.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing various approaches to the problem. Some have offered insights into the convergence behavior of the sequence, while others are questioning specific steps in the reasoning process. There is no explicit consensus on the best approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the sequence is constructed from strictly positive terms, which may influence the convergence analysis. There is also mention of the Monotone Convergence Theorem as a potential tool for establishing convergence.

Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44

Homework Statement


Prove that ##\displaystyle t_{n+1} = (1 - \frac{1}{4n^2}) t_n## where ##t_1=1## converges.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


First, we must prove that the sequence is bounded below. We will prove that it is bounded below by 0. ##t_1 = 1 \ge 0##, so the base case holds. Now, suppose that ##t_k \ge 0##. Then ##t_{k+1} = (1 - \frac{1}{4k^2}) t_k \ge (1 - \frac{1}{4k^2}) (0) = 0##. So the induction is complete, and the sequence is bounded below by 0.

Now we must show that the sequence is decreasing. ##t_2 = 15/16 \le 1 = t_1##, so the base case holds. Now, suppose that ##t_{k+1} \le t_k##. Then ##t_{k+2} = (1 - \frac{1}{4(k+1)^2})t_{k+1} \le t_{k+1}##. So the induction is complete, and the sequence is decreasing.

By the Monotone Convergence Theorem, the sequence converges.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Seems ok, btw you can actually solve this recursive equation by iteration, and see that it's decreasing explicitly.
 
Mr Davis 97 said:

Homework Statement


Prove that ##\displaystyle t_{n+1} = (1 - \frac{1}{4n^2}) t_n## where ##t_1=1## converges.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


First, we must prove that the sequence is bounded below. We will prove that it is bounded below by 0. ##t_1 = 1 \ge 0##, so the base case holds. Now, suppose that ##t_k \ge 0##. Then ##t_{k+1} = (1 - \frac{1}{4k^2}) t_k \ge (1 - \frac{1}{4k^2}) (0) = 0##. So the induction is complete, and the sequence is bounded below by 0.

Now we must show that the sequence is decreasing. ##t_2 = 15/16 \le 1 = t_1##, so the base case holds. Now, suppose that ##t_{k+1} \le t_k##. Then ##t_{k+2} = (1 - \frac{1}{4(k+1)^2})t_{k+1} \le t_{k+1}##. So the induction is complete, and the sequence is decreasing.

By the Monotone Convergence Theorem, the sequence converges.

Another, perhaps easier way is to note that
$$|t_{n+1}-t_n| = \frac{1}{4n^2} |t_n| \leq \frac{1}{4} |t_n|,$$
so we have (at least) geometrically fast convergence.
 
One question. In showing that the sequence decreases, why didn't I have to use the inductive hypothesis?
 
Mr Davis 97 said:
One question. In showing that the sequence decreases, why didn't I have to use the inductive hypothesis?
$$ \frac{t_{n+1}}{t_n }= 1 - \frac{1}{4n^2} ,$$
so if you know that ##t_n > 0## then you have ##0 < t_{n+1}/t_n < 1,## hence a positive strictly decreasing sequence.
 
For n \geq 1, it follows from <br /> \frac34 \leq 1 - \frac{1}{4n^2} &lt; 1 that <br /> 0 &lt; |t_{n+1}| = \left|1 - \frac{1}{4n^2}\right||t_n| &lt; |t_n| and so |t_n| is strictly decreasing. Since each t_n is by construction a product of strictly positive reals we can immediately remove the absolute value signs.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K