Solving Subscripted Variable Equations: Formula and Example Problems

  • Thread starter Thread starter Richay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Variables
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving equations involving subscripted variables, specifically focusing on systems of equations and variable relationships. Participants are attempting to find values for unknowns based on given equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are sharing their attempts to solve equations, questioning their understanding of the methods used, and discussing the validity of their answers. Some express confusion over the correctness of their solutions and the methods they employed.

Discussion Status

There is active engagement with various approaches being discussed, including the reduction method and system of equations. Some participants offer guidance on how to set up the equations correctly, while others express uncertainty about their previous attempts.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention imposed homework rules and expectations from their teacher regarding prior knowledge, which may affect their approach to solving the problems.

Richay
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
What would be the formula for solving problems like this?

Solve for all variables.

RETE = RWTW, RE = 200, RW = 250, 9 - TE = TW

Answer in the form: (TE, TW)


Seems simple, but not for me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RETE = RWTW, RE = 200, RW = 250, 9 - TE = TW

Answer in the form: (TE, TW)


RE(200) x TE(5) = 1000

9-5=4(TW)

RW(250) x TW(4) = 1000

I enter the answer 5, 4


But it says I am wrong.


-------------------------------

And for another one

Solve for the unknown variables.

RETE + RCTC = 263, RE = 40, RC = 7, TC = TE + 4.

Answer in the form: TE, TC

The answer is 5, 9. (I'm correct)

-----------------------------------------------

I'm stuck on this one though

NN + ND = 150

5NN + 10ND = 450

Answer in the form: (NN, ND)
 
Last edited:
Ever heard of the reduction method?
 
Not "reduction method". My teahcer doesn't teach, he expects us to know everything.

Yet, i don't understand how i got the first problem wrong. I understand what I'm doing though, to an extent.
 
Uhmm, you've solved the first problem correctly, the answer is (5, 4). However, tis problem should not be done by Trial and Error method. This problem is to solve the system of equations.
The first equation is RE TE = RW TW
So your first equation is 200 TE = 250 TW, or in other words, if you divide both sides by 50, you'll get 4 TE = 5 TW, or 4 TE - 5 TW = 0.
Now the second equation is 9 - TE = TW or TE + TW = 9
So we have a syatem of 2 linear equations, and we need to solve for 2 unknows, i.e TE, and TW:
[tex]\left\{ \begin{array}{l} 4TE - 5TW = 0 \quad (1) \\ TE + TW = 9 \quad (2) \end{array} \right.[/tex]
We first multiply 2 sides of the equation (2) by 4. Why? In the first equation, we have 4 TE, and we need 4 TE in the second equation, too.
After multiplying, we will have:
[tex]\Leftrightarrow \left\{ \begin{array}{l} 4TE - 5TW = 0 \quad (1) \\ 4 TE + 4 TW = 36 \quad (2) \end{array} \right.[/tex]
Now, if we subtract 2 sides of equation (1) from 2 sides of equation (2), we'll have:
9 TW = 36 => TW = 4
Then we can either plug TW = 4 into equation (1), or (2), to solve for TE. Say we'll plug it in equation (1) 4 TE - 5 . 4 = 0 <=> 4TE = 20 <=> TE = 5.
So the solution to the system is:
[tex]\Leftrightarrow \left\{ \begin{array}{l} TE = 5 \\ TW = 4 \end{array} \right.[/tex]
Can you get this? :)
The third problem can be solved in the same manner. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K