Solving the DE: I Tried a Substitution and Failed

  • Thread starter Thread starter namu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Substitution
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a differential equation of the form \(\dot{y}=\frac{t+3y-5}{t-y-1}\). Participants are exploring various substitution methods and approaches to simplify the equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss different substitution strategies, including a linear substitution and grouping terms. Some express frustration with their attempts, noting that certain substitutions lead to complications or do not yield progress.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of various substitution techniques, with some participants offering suggestions while others express confusion or difficulty in applying them. No consensus has been reached, but several lines of reasoning are being actively discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention specific constants and terms in the equation, indicating a focus on how to handle these within their substitutions. There is also a reference to the equation being homogeneous, which may influence the approach taken.

namu
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
How do I solve the DE

[itex]\dot{y}[/itex]=[itex]\frac{t+3y-5}{t-y-1}[/itex]

I tried using a substitution of the form u=ax+by+c, however was
unsucessful. Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I multiplied both sides by the denominator and grouped like terms.
This suggested a substitution [itex]z=\dot{y} + 1[/itex] - which could be solved for z in terms of t.

There's probably a better way.
 
Simon,

Thank you for the suggestion. I tried your suggestion, however do
not seem to be getting anywhere. When I group like terms, I get

[itex](\dot{y}-1)x-(\dot{y}+3)-\dot{y}+5=0[/itex]

If I use

[itex]z=\dot{y}-1[/itex],

I get no where, plus I lose my derivatives.

If I use

[itex]\dot{z}=\dot{y}-1[/itex],

I get

[itex]x \dot{z} - (\dot{z}+4) y - \dot{z} + 6=0[/itex]

which is worse than before. I am still lost.
 
Hmmm ... did I mess up? Did I misplace 2y ... I just scribbled it on my window, let's see:

[tex](t-y-1)\dot y = t + 3y -5[/tex]... expand
[tex]t \dot y - y\dot y -\dot y -t -3y +5 = 0[/tex]... group terms
[tex]t(\dot y -1) - y(\dot y +3) - \dot y +5 = 0[/tex]... yep, looks like I did!

How about [itex]z=\dot y + 3[/itex] ...

note: [itex]t(\dot y -1) = t(\dot y +3) - 4t[/itex]

dammit! I still get a stray y.
 
First get rid of the constants on the right hand side. If you solve
t + 3y - 5 = 0
t - y - 1 = 0
you get t = 2, y = 1

So let T = t + 2, Y = t + 1
DY/DT = (T + 3Y)/(T - Y)
Then you can separate the variables by letting Y(T) = Tu(T)
 
Thank you!
 
Yes - thank you and my apologies to namu.

aside:
did you know that "namu" is Maori for sand-fly?
 
Hi!

In fact this ODE is of the homogeneous kind (attached page) :
 

Attachments

  • LambertW.JPG
    LambertW.JPG
    34.6 KB · Views: 437
Simon Bridge said:
Yes - thank you and my apologies to namu.

aside:
did you know that "namu" is Maori for sand-fly?

No, i didn't know that. That is interesting. Namu is my name. Its often
included in buddhist chants. Also in korean, namu means tree. It is interesting
how one word has many different meanings in different cultures.
 
  • #10
Yes, I saw that once I realized the clever substitution that was pointed out. Thank you for the work.
 
  • #11
That's cool (the name)!

I can see why a tree would come up in chants quite a lot. Trees are a feature in the life of Siddartha don't they?

"Namu" can be a nickname, and they have spiritual connotations to the Maori too.
This has been a neat window between cultures, thanks.
 
  • #12
First, you need to make an "additive" substitution:
[tex] t = \tilde{t} + \alpha, y = \tilde{y} + \beta[/tex]
that will cancel the free terms in the numerator and denominator of the fraction. Effectively, you need to solve the following linear system:
[tex] \alpha + 3 \beta - 5 = 0, \ \alpha - \beta - 1 = 0[/tex]
After that, considering [itex]\tilde{y} = f(\tilde{t})[/itex], you get a homogeneous ODE:
[tex] \dot{\tilde{y}} = \frac{\tilde{t} + 3 \tilde{y}}{\tilde{t} - \tilde{y}} = \frac{1 + 3 \frac{\tilde{y}}{\tilde{t}}}{1 - \frac{\tilde{y}}{\tilde{t}}} = f(\frac{\tilde{y}}{\tilde{t}}), f(z) = \frac{1 + 3 z}{1 - z}[/tex]
You can separate the variables by making one more subtitution:
[tex] z(\tilde{t}) = \frac{\tilde{y}}{\tilde{t}} \Rightarrow \tilde{y} = \tilde{t} \, z, \ \dot{\tilde{y}} = \tilde{t} \, \dot{z} + z[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K