Solving the Hypergeometric Function Integral Representation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the integral representation of the hypergeometric function, specifically the equation involving the Gamma function and an integral from 0 to 1. Participants explore the relationship between this representation and the hypergeometric differential equation, discussing the challenges involved in the proof and the implications of singular points.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the integral representation of the hypergeometric function and requests a proof.
  • Another participant suggests that demonstrating the function's solution to the hypergeometric differential equation might suffice for the proof.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the complexity of the proof and the tedious nature of the calculations involved.
  • A participant notes that the integral representation does not account for singular points at x = 0, 1, and ∞, which are relevant to the hypergeometric function.
  • One participant shares their attempt to insert the integral representation into the differential equation, providing detailed steps but ultimately expressing difficulty in simplifying the resulting expressions.
  • There is a request for further clarification on the approach taken by another participant regarding their attempt to prove the relationship.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need to connect the integral representation to the hypergeometric differential equation, but there is no consensus on how to proceed or resolve the complexities involved in the proof.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in the participants' approaches, including unresolved mathematical steps and the dependence on the treatment of singular points in the hypergeometric function.

alyafey22
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,556
Reaction score
2
Prove the following

$$ {}_2 F_1 \left( a,b; c ; x \right) = \frac{\Gamma(c)}{\Gamma(b)\Gamma(c-b)}\int^1_0 t^{b-1}(1-t)^{c-b-1} (1-xt)^{-a} \, dt$$​

Hypergeometric function .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint

$$(a)_k = \frac{\Gamma(k+a)}{\Gamma(a)}$$
 
Would it be sufficient to show that your version of _2 F _1 solves the hypergeometric differential equation? I haven't tried it yet, and it looks like it might be a bit on the nasty side of tedious, but it should be a tolerable exercise.

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
Would it be sufficient to show that your version of _2 F _1 solves the hypergeometric differential equation? I haven't tried it yet, and it looks like it might be a bit on the nasty side of tedious, but it should be a tolerable exercise.

-Dan

Not a clue . I skipped that part when I read about hypergeomtric function (Emo)
 
ZaidAlyafey said:
Prove the following

$$ {}_2 F_1 \left( a,b; c ; x \right) = \frac{\Gamma(c)}{\Gamma(b)\Gamma(c-b)}\int^1_0 t^{b-1}(1-t)^{c-b-1} (1-xt)^{-a} \, dt$$​

Hypergeometric function .
This is more or less an exercise in Gamma functions.

The series solution for the hypergeometric function is:
[math]_2 F _1 (a, b, c; x) = \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{(a)_n (b)_n}{(c)_n} \frac{x^n}{n!}[/math]

where [math](a)_n \equiv \frac{ \Gamma (a + n)}{ \Gamma (a) }[/math]

We start with the integral formula:
$$_2 F_1 (a, b, c; x) = \frac{\Gamma (c)}{\Gamma (b)\Gamma (c-b)}\int_0^1 t^{b-1} (1-t)^{c-b-1} (1-xt)^{-a}~dt$$

Expanding the [math](1 - xt)^{-a}[/math] and inserting it into the integral formula gives
$$_2 F_1 (a, b, c; x) = \frac{\Gamma (c)}{\Gamma (b)\Gamma (c-b)}\int_0^1 t^{b-1} (1-t)^{c-b-1} \left ( \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{ \Gamma (a + n) }{ \Gamma (a) } \frac{(tx)^n}{n!} \right )~dt$$

After a bit of "massaging":
$$_2 F_1 (a, b, c; x) = \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} (a)_n \frac{\Gamma (c)}{\Gamma (b)\Gamma (c-b)} \left ( \int_0^1 t^{b + n -1} (1-t)^{c-b-1} dt \right ) \frac{x^n}{n!}$$

Now,
[math]\int_0^1 t^{b + n -1} (1-t)^{c-b-1} dt = B(b + n, c- b) = \frac{ \Gamma (b + n) \Gamma (c - b)}{\Gamma (c + n)}[/math]
where B is the beta function.

Plugging this in gives
[math]_2 F_1 (a, b, c; x) = \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{\Gamma (c)}{\Gamma (b)\Gamma (c-b)} (a)_n \left ( \frac{ \Gamma (b + n) \Gamma (c - b)}{\Gamma (c + n)} \right ) \frac{x^n}{n!}[/math]

Simplifying gives
[math]_2 F_1 (a, b, c; x) = \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} (a)_n \left ( \frac{\Gamma (b) }{ \Gamma (b + n)} \frac{\Gamma (c)}{\Gamma (c + n)} \right ) \frac{x^n}{n!} = \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \frac{(a)_n (b)_n}{(c)_n} \frac{x^n}{n!}[/math]

-Dan

Edit: Okay it's 1:57 AM (Eastern) and I think I got all the typos fixed.

Edit 2: I forgot to mention that the hypergeometric function has singular points at [math]x = 0, 1, \infty[/math]. None of these singularities appear in the given integral representation. Nor does the series representation take into account the x = 0 and x = 1 singularities.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Way to go topsquark (Clapping)
 
It would be cool if someone could input the integral rep into the differential equation and show that it's a solution. I wasn't able to do it.

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
It would be cool if someone could input the integral rep into the differential equation and show that it's a solution. I wasn't able to do it.

-Dan

Hey Dan , can you post your attempt . I need to know what you are thinking about ?
 
I'm really not able to do much more than putting the integral form into the differential equation and a little bit of simplifying, but here it is.

First we are given:
[math]_2 F _1 (a, b, c; x) = \frac{ \Gamma (c) }{ \Gamma (b) \Gamma (c - b) } \int_0^1 t^{b - 1} (1 - t)^{c - b - 1} (1 - xt)^{-a} dt[/math]

The hypergeometric differential equation is:
[math]x(1 - x) y''(x) + (c - (a + b + 1)x) y'(x) - ab y(x) = 0[/math]

One of the solutions of this equation is [math]y(x) =~_2 F _1 (a, b, c; x)[/math]

Inserting the integral representation gives:
[math]x(1 - x) \left [ \frac{ \Gamma (c) }{ \Gamma (b) \Gamma (c - b) } \int_0^1 t^{b - 1} (1 - t)^{c - b - 1} a(a + 1)t^2 (1 - xt)^{-(a + 2)} dt \right ] [/math]
[math]+ \left [ ( c - (a + b + 1)x ) \frac{ \Gamma (c) }{ \Gamma (b) \Gamma (c - b) } \int_0^1 t^{b - 1} (1 - t)^{c - b - 1} at (1 - xt)^{-(a + 1)} dt \right ] [/math]
[math]- ab \left [ \frac{ \Gamma (c) }{ \Gamma (b) \Gamma (c - b) } \int_0^1 t^{b - 1} (1 - t)^{c - b - 1} (1 - xt)^{-a} dt \right ] = 0[/math]

Simplifying:
[math]x(1 - x) (a + 1) \int_0^1 t^{b + 1} (1 - t)^{c - b - 1} (1 - xt)^{-(a + 2)} dt [/math]
[math]+ ( c - (a + b + 1)x ) \int_0^1 t^b (1 - t)^{c - b - 1} (1 - xt)^{-(a + 1)} dt - b \int_0^1 t^{b - 1} (1 - t)^{c - b - 1} (1 - xt)^{-a} dt = 0[/math]

There is a way, obviously, to put all the x's and constants inside the integrals and then put this all under one integral but I am unable to see any value to this approach.

-Dan
 
  • #10
So your attempt is to prove that the hypergeometric function satisfies the differential equation using the integral representation ?
 
  • #11
ZaidAlyafey said:
So your attempt is to prove that the hypergeometric function satisfies the differential equation using the integral representation ?
Yup. It should be workable, but I'm out of tricks on this one. I can't figure out how to solve the integrals that come up.

-Dan
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K