Solving the Langevin Equation w/ Newton's Second Law

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion addresses the reconciliation of the Langevin equation with Newton's Second Law, highlighting their apparent differences. The Langevin equation incorporates a stochastic term, H(t), which introduces randomness, while Newton's Second Law is deterministic, represented as F = ma. Participants clarify that despite these differences, both equations fundamentally describe motion, with the Langevin equation accounting for additional forces such as friction and thermal fluctuations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics, specifically Newton's Second Law.
  • Familiarity with stochastic processes and their applications in physics.
  • Basic knowledge of the Langevin equation and its components.
  • Concepts of force, mass, and acceleration in a physical context.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation and applications of the Langevin equation in statistical mechanics.
  • Explore stochastic differential equations and their significance in modeling random processes.
  • Study the implications of thermal fluctuations in physical systems.
  • Learn about the relationship between deterministic and stochastic models in physics.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, particularly those studying statistical mechanics, classical mechanics, and stochastic processes.

ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1
[SOLVED] langevin equation

Homework Statement


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Langevin_equation
Can someone explain to me how to reconcile the Langevin equation with Newton's Second Law? They are clearly different and I cannot think of a satisfactory reason why!


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
why are they clearly different? i don't seem to get you. it looks like there's ma on one side, and a sum of forces on the other side. looks perfectly like the 2nd law to me. is it the H(t) term you're worrying about?
 
Now that I think about, I don't see the point of my question either.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K