Solving the Paradox of Length Contraction on a Train

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion addresses the paradox of length contraction in special relativity (SR) using a scenario involving a train traveling at 0.3c and bandits rigging trap doors in a mountain. Participants conclude that the bandits perceive the doors closing simultaneously, while the train does not, resolving the paradox. The conversation also touches on a guillotine scenario, reinforcing that simultaneity is frame-dependent and that no paradox exists in either case.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity (SR)
  • Knowledge of length contraction principles
  • Familiarity with simultaneity in different reference frames
  • Basic concepts of relativistic velocity (e.g., 0.3c)
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the "pole in the barn" paradox in special relativity
  • Study the implications of simultaneity in different inertial frames
  • Explore practical applications of length contraction in physics
  • Learn about relativistic effects at high velocities, specifically at speeds approaching the speed of light
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in the complexities of special relativity and its paradoxes.

Flexo
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
There's one of the paradoxes with SR that I've never actually seen an answer for.

There is a man on a train traveling at a velocity where length contraction starts to matter. Say, .3c. There are some dirty bandits that have rigged up a trap door system in a mountain up ahead on the tracks. There are two(currently open) doors on either end of the mountain, which is the same length as the train. The dirty bandits know how fast the train is going, and they have made it so that at the appropriate time, both doors will shut while the train is inside.

The train will see the mountain as length contracted, and the bandits will see the train as length contracted. Does the train get stuck in the mountain or does the exit door crush it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the bandits close the doors simultaneously from their point of view but not simultaneously from the point of view of the train.

no paradox at all.
 
granpa said:
the bandits close the doors simultaneously from their point of view but not simultaneously from the point of view of the train.

no paradox at all.

Oh, that's way simpler than I was thinking it would be. Thanks.
 
its all way simpler than people think it is.
 
granpa said:
its all way simpler than people think it is.

Actually...is it possible for them to have only one door, and have it rigged to shut immediately before the train would leave the tunnel? Simultaneity doesn't seem to apply.
 
granpa said:
?

Alright, there is a guillotine type-contraption sitting at the end of a tunnel. The bandits have set it to fall immediately before the train reaches the end of the tunnel. The same length contraction effects occur, the train sees the tunnel is shorter and the bandits see the train as shorter. Does the guillotine crush the train or merely stop it?
 
the guillotine and the front of the train are at the same place at the same time. this will be true for all observers regardless of their velocity.
 
granpa said:
the guillotine and the front of the train are at the same place at the same time. this will be true for all observers regardless of their velocity.

Oh, I suppose I'm making it more complicated than it needs to be. Thanks for the answers.
 
granpa said:
the bandits close the doors simultaneously from their point of view but not simultaneously from the point of view of the train.

no paradox at all.

I think when the train is in the tunnel (exactly between the two trapdoors), the event of closing the doors will be simultaneous from both point of views. No?
 
  • #10
Flexo said:
There's one of the paradoxes with SR that I've never actually seen an answer for.
A identical problem that is discussed everywhere is the "pole in the barn" paradox.

AntigenX said:
I think when the train is in the tunnel (exactly between the two trapdoors), the event of closing the doors will be simultaneous from both point of views. No?
No. Simultaneity is frame dependent.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
66
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
6K