Solving the same question two ways: Parallel transport vs. the Lie derivative

Click For Summary
The discussion contrasts two methods for solving vector transport: parallel transport and the Lie derivative. It details the derivation of differential equations from parallel transport equations, leading to solutions expressed in terms of trigonometric functions. The challenge arises with the Lie derivative, where the participant struggles to connect its definition to vector transport along a curve. Insights suggest examining the commutation of vector fields using the Lie bracket to understand their geometric implications. References to Misner and Wheeler's work are recommended for further clarity on the topic.
Markus Kahn
Messages
110
Reaction score
14
Homework Statement
Assume we are working with the metric
$$ds^2 = R^2 d\theta^2 + R^2 \sin^2(\theta)d\varphi^2,$$
where ##R=const.##. One can easily check that we then have
$$\Gamma^{\theta}_{\varphi\varphi} = - \sin\theta\cos\theta\quad \text{and}\quad \Gamma^{\varphi}_{\varphi\theta}=\Gamma^{\varphi}_{\theta\varphi}=\cot \theta .$$

a) Consider the parallel transport of a vector ##X=(X_0^\theta,X_0^\varphi)## around a curve ##\gamma=(\theta_0,\varphi)##, where ##\theta_0=const.## and ##\varphi\in [0,2\pi)##, on the 2-sphere.

b) Perform the same transport of the vector using the Lie derivative and compare the results.

(It's been a while since I did this exercise and I'm not 100% sure if I remembered everything correctly, the main point was to perform the same job "transporting a vector", once with parallel transport and once with the Lie derivative...)
Relevant Equations
Parallel transport equation:
$$\dot{v}^i = -\Gamma^{i}_{jk} \dot{\gamma}^{j} v^k.$$
a) I found this part to be quite straight forward. From the Parallel transport equation we obtain the differential equations for the different components of ##X^\mu##:
$$
\begin{align*}
\frac{\partial X^{\theta}}{\partial \varphi} &=X^{\varphi} \sin \theta_{0} \cos \theta_{0}, \\
\frac{\partial X^{\varphi}}{\partial \varphi}&=-X^{\theta} \cot \theta_0.
\end{align*}
$$
Taking the derivative with respect to ##\varphi## of both equations and substituting them into each other we find
$$
\begin{align*}
\frac{\partial^{2} X^{\theta}}{\partial \varphi^{2}}&=-X^{\theta} \cos ^{2} \theta_{0},\\
\frac{\partial^{2} X^{\varphi}}{\partial \varphi^{2}}&=-X^{\varphi} \cos ^{2} \theta_{0}
\end{align*}
$$
so two times the same differential equation. Defining now ##\alpha:= \cos\theta_0##, both equations will be solved by
$$
\begin{aligned}
X^{\theta}(\varphi) &=A \cos \alpha \varphi+B \sin \alpha \varphi ,\\
X^{\varphi}(\varphi) &=C \cos \alpha \varphi+D \sin \alpha \varphi.
\end{aligned}
$$
Initial conditions ##X = (X_0^\theta, X_0^\varphi)## and
$$
\begin{array}{l}
\left.\frac{\partial X^{\theta}}{\partial \varphi}\right|_{\varphi=0}=X_{0}^{\varphi} \sin \theta_{0} \cos \theta_{0} \\
\left.\frac{\partial X^{\varphi}}{\partial \varphi}\right|_{\varphi=0}=-X_{0}^{\theta} \frac{\cos \theta_{0}}{\sin \theta_{0}}
\end{array}
$$
lead us to
$$
\begin{aligned}
X^{\theta}(\varphi) &=X_{0}^{\theta} \cos \left(\varphi \cos \theta_{0}\right)+X_{0}^{\varphi} \sin \theta_{0} \sin \left(\varphi \cos \theta_{0}\right) \\
X^{\varphi}(\varphi) &=X_{0}^{\varphi} \cos \left(\varphi \cos \theta_{0}\right)-\frac{X_{0}^{\theta}}{\sin \theta_{0}} \sin \left(\varphi \cos \theta_{0}\right).
\end{aligned}
$$

b) Here is where the problem starts. I know the definition of the Lie derivative of a tensor field ##T## as
$$
\left(L_{Y} T\right)_{p}=\left.\frac{d}{d t}\right|_{t=0}\left(\left(\tau_{-t}\right)_{*} T_{\tau_{t}(p)}\right),
$$
where ##(\tau_t)_*## is the push-forward. Now the tensor field in this exercise is a vector field so the expression simplifies dramatically,
$$L_Y(X) = [Y,X].$$
The problem is that I don't really know what I'm supposed to do with this and what exactly this has to do with the transport of a vector along a curve..

Any insights are appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hopefully it helps.If you put some specific objects in the Lie bracket you check whether this objects are commute or not.If [X,Y]=XY-YX =0 the Objects(here vectorfields) commute.This leads to XY=YX otherwise they don't commute.Maybe you can try to interpret the geometry with this new knowledge .You can also check Misner and Wheeler(Gravitation) for a good reference on this field or some nice older post on this board.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K