Solving this problem using the energy method

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
7 replies · 3K views
Abhishek11235
Messages
174
Reaction score
39
Homework Statement
This is the exercise from Morin's book on classical mechanics. The problem is as follows:
Consider a leaky bucket pulled by a string towards wall(see screenshot). The bucket leaks all the way which is constant (i.e ##dm/dx = \lambda## where m is the instantaneous mass of bucket. He asks to calculate kinetic energy as the function of distance
Relevant Equations
##dE/dx= F##
I attempted the solution using force method. I got correct. However, I was stuck at the alternative way to solve problem using energy method. As shown in screenshot 2, he tells that the energy of system changes due to 2 ways:
- The tension T
- Leaking of mass

As shown in screenshot 2 ,the leaking of mass contributes dx/x. My question is how this expression comes up? Please detailed justification and Thanks in advance
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2019-04-29-23-53-33.png
    Screenshot_2019-04-29-23-53-33.png
    40.6 KB · Views: 468
  • Screenshot_2019-04-29-23-41-44.png
    Screenshot_2019-04-29-23-41-44.png
    42.1 KB · Views: 475
on Phys.org
As the mass moves an incremental distance x, it loses a fraction of its mass. If it is at distance 10 and moves incrementally by dx, it will lose dx/10 of its mass. If it is at distance x, it will lose a fraction, dx/x, of its mass.

If it loses dx/x of its mass, it loses dx/x of its energy.

Just as Morin says, the contribution to dE from this is E dx/x.
 
Last edited:
Abhishek11235 said:
My question is how this expression comes up
It is confusing because of the way x is defined.
Try obtaining the equation for m as a function of x. The leak contributes ##\frac 12 v^2dm## to dE. Substitute for ##v^2## using E.
 
jbriggs444 said:
As the mass moves an incremental distance x, it loses a fraction of its mass. If it is at distance 10 and moves incrementally by dx, it will lose dx/10 of its mass. If it is at distance x, it will lose a fraction, dx/x, of its mass.

If it loses dx/x of its mass, it loses dx/x of its energy.

Just as Morin says, the contribution to dE from this is E dx/x.
How can it lose dx/x fraction? The rate of leaking is constant. So ##dE= 1/2 dm v^2 = 1/2 \lambda dx v^2 = E dx/L## since ##\lambda= M/L##. I want justification for dx/x.
 
haruspex said:
It is confusing because of the way x is defined.
Try obtaining the equation for m as a function of x. The leak contributes ##\frac 12 v^2dm## to dE. Substitute for ##v^2## using E.
I got E dx/L as I showed above
 
Abhishek11235 said:
The rate of leaking is constant. So ##dE= 1/2 dm v^2 = 1/2 \lambda dx v^2 = E dx/L##.
The last equality is not correct. It looks like you assumed that ##E = \frac{1}{2}Mv^2##. But the mass of sand in the bucket is not ##M## (except at the initial point of release).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Abhishek11235
TSny said:
The last equality is not correct. It looks like you assumed that ##E = \frac{1}{2}Mv^2##. But the mass of sand in the bucket is not ##M## (except at the initial point of release).
Ok. So, I tried doing the dE. However,to get correct answer I have to assume dm/dx= M/x. Otherwise I get L everytime. Can you elaborate your answer please?
 
Abhishek11235 said:
Ok. So, I tried doing the dE. However,to get correct answer I have to assume dm/dx= M/x. Otherwise I get L everytime. Can you elaborate your answer please?
As @TSny writes, you substituted E/M for ½v2, but E depends on the current mass, m, not the initial mass, M