Solving Twin Delta Potential: Deriving Hyperbolic Cosine Function

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Delta Potential
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the solutions for a twin delta function potential described by V(x) = -g δ(x+a) + δ(x-a). Participants are exploring the behavior of wavefunctions in the context of quantum mechanics, particularly focusing on the symmetry of the potential and its implications for the wavefunctions in the regions outside and between the delta functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the nature of the wavefunctions based on the symmetry of the potential, questioning how this symmetry affects the coefficients of the wavefunction in the interval between -a and a. There is an exploration of continuity conditions and the implications of the Schrödinger equation being a second-order differential equation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants raising questions about the relationships between coefficients in different regions and the continuity of the wavefunction and its derivatives. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of continuity conditions, but there is still uncertainty regarding the implications of these conditions on the coefficients of the wavefunction.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of the problem without a complete expression for the wavefunction at certain points, which adds to the challenge of establishing continuity and deriving the necessary relationships between coefficients.

ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1
Hello, how would you derive the solutions of the twin delta function potential:
V(x) = -g \delta(x+a) + \delta(x -a )
?

Obviously the solutions outside the potential are Ae^Kx for x less than aand A e^-Kx for x greater than a. But how do you derive the hyperbolic cosine function for the interval between -a and a? Please use symmetry arguments because I need to understand those!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your potential is even about the origin. What does that tell you about solutions for the wavefunction?
 
That tells me that because the solutions are exponentials and the Schrödinger equation is a second-order DE, the wavefunctions need to be even or odd about the origin. Why does this mean the coefficients need to be the same for the even and odd parts of the function in the interval -a to a?
 
ehrenfest said:
Why does this mean the coefficients need to be the same for the even and odd parts of the function in the interval -a to a?
That follows from continuity at -a and +a (writing psi in the middle as the sum of even and odd parts).
 
Last edited:
So,

\psi(x) = C e^{Kx} + D e^{-Kx}

in the middle interval. So we apply

C e^{Ka} + D e^{-Ka} = Ae^{-Ka}

and

C e^{-Ka} + D e^{Ka} = Ae^{Ka}.

I do not see why that implies C = D. I guess a related issue I am confused about is how we know the coefficient for the the wavefunction for large positive and negative numbers is the same (A).

EDIT: those two last equation are not supposed to be the same (look at the tex pop up to see that). I think the tex compiler is just being stupid
 
Last edited:
You don't have to start by assuming they have the same coefficient, A. Let the coefficient in the region x>a, be B. From continuity of the derivatives, you'll find that A/B = C/D = h, say. Use this in the equation for the continuity of \psi(x).
 
Do you mean the disconuity of the first derivatives at a and -a? The equation

\psi(a^+) - \psi(a^-) = \pm 2mg/\hbar^2 \psi(a)

?

The problem with that is that I do not have a single expression for psi(a), right?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
19
Views
3K