The Double Dirac Delta Function Potential wave functions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves analyzing a double Dirac delta function potential, specifically V(x) = -α(δ(x+a) + δ(x-a)), to find the normalized wave functions and determine the number of bound states using the Time-Independent Schrödinger Equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the continuity conditions of the wave function at the points of discontinuity, x = -a and x = a, and how to relate the coefficients of the wave functions across different regions.
  • There is consideration of whether the wave functions should be assumed to be even or odd due to the symmetry of the potential.
  • Questions arise regarding the handling of the discontinuity in the derivative of the wave function at the delta function locations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on equating wave functions across different regions and relating coefficients. There is acknowledgment of the need to satisfy continuity conditions, but no consensus has been reached on the specific approach to patching the discontinuities or normalizing the wave functions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of handling the infinite discontinuities at the delta function locations and the implications of the symmetry of the potential on the form of the wave functions.

Positron137
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the double Dirac delta function V(x) = -α(δ(x+a) + δ(x-a)). Using this potential, find the (normalized) wave functions, sketch them, and determine the # of bound states.

Homework Equations


Time-Independent Schrödinger's Equation: Eψ = (-h^2)/2m (∂^2/∂x^2)ψ + V(x)ψ. (for the single-variable function ψ(x))


The Attempt at a Solution



First, I substituted the relevant potential: so the TISE (Time-Independent Schrödinger Equation) became: Eψ = (-h^2)/2m (∂^2/∂x^2)ψ - α(δ(x+a) + δ(x-a))ψ.

Next, I considered the points x = -a and x = a, since those are the points where V(x) contains an infinite discontinuity.

Then, I divided this problem into 3 sections: x < -a, -a < x< -a, and x > a. Unfortunately, I wasn't able to finish the solution for the bound states, but nevertheless I started with bound-state solutions (E < 0).

I solved the general solution for x < -a, which was ψ(x) = Ae^(kx) + Be^(-kx). Since this blows up when x -> -∞, the physical solution would be ψ(x) = Ae^(kx).

For the section -a < x < a, I got as a general sol'n, ψ(x) = Ce^(kx) + De^(-kx). However, this time, ψ(x) does not blow up since x is constrained between -a and a.

For the section x > a, after I got the general solution and modified it (to take care of the infinite part), I got ψ(x) = Fe^(-kx).

Then I applied the continuity conditions. The first one states that ψ(x) must be continuous at the discontinuity points. But I wasn't sure how to patch up the discontinuity here. I couldn't just simply match coefficients, because the points of discontinuity weren't at x = 0, but at x = ±a. From this point, I knew that if I could satisfy the first condition, then by integrating the TISE, I could satisfy the second boundary condition (which was that ψ'(x) had to be continuous). From there, I could normalize ψ(x) (and obtain the wave function(s) for bound states), and determine the allowed energies. But I got stuck at the point where I had to patch up the discontinuities by satisfying the 2 boundary conditions. If anyone could help from this point onwards, I would really appreciate it. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should be able to write out the condition of continuity of the wave function at x = a and also x = -a. You will get a relation between A, C, D, and e2ka and a similar relation between F, C, D, and e2ka.

Since the potential function is symmetric about x = 0, you can assume the wavefunctions are either even functions or odd functions of x. This will allow you to easily relate A to F and C to D for the even and odd cases. If you don't want to assume the wavefunctions are even or odd, then the algebra is a little longer and you will end up showing that the wavefunction is either even or odd.

The derivative of the wavefunction is not continuous at the location of the delta functions. Hopefully, you've covered how to handle this. If not, you can find a discussion http://www.harding.edu/lmurray/Quantum_files/_Ch5%20Delta%20Function%20Potential.pdf .
 
Ok. Thanks! So I can equate the wave functions for the x < -a to the -a < x < a regions first; then equate the wave functions for the -a < x < a and the x > a regions right? And it's perfectly fine of the factors e^(ka) and e^(-ka) remain there right?
 
Yes, that's right.
 
Ok. Thanks! Yah, I was getting a bit confused whether to include the e^(ka) and e^(-ka) terms in the first place, but it makes sense now. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K