Solving (v+c)^3-3vc(v+c)-(v^3+c^3)=0: What am I Missing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ali PMPAINT
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving the cubic equation (v+c)^3 - 3vc(v+c) - (v^3 + c^3) = 0, with substitutions v+c = y, -3vc = p, and v^3 + c^3 = q. Participants identify a sign error in the equation, clarifying that -(v^3 + c^3) should be +(v^3 + c^3). The conversation also delves into the cube roots of unity, specifically w_0, w_1, and w_2, and their polar forms, which are essential for finding all solutions to cubic equations. The correct solutions for x^3 + 2x - 3 = 0 are confirmed to include complex roots, emphasizing the importance of accurate calculations and understanding of polar forms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Cubic equations and their properties
  • Complex numbers and polar forms
  • Cube roots of unity
  • Polynomial division techniques (synthetic division)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of the cubic formula for solving cubic equations
  • Learn about the properties and applications of cube roots of unity in polynomial equations
  • Explore the use of synthetic division for finding polynomial roots
  • Investigate the relationship between complex numbers and their polar representations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying algebra, and anyone interested in solving cubic equations and understanding complex numbers.

ali PMPAINT
Messages
44
Reaction score
8
Homework Statement
the answer to y^3+py+q=0
Relevant Equations
Picture
243310

So, you can prove it by using (v+c)^3-3vc(v+c)-(v^3+c^3)=0, where v+c=y and -3vc=p and v^3+c^3=q. The problem is, when I try to solve a one, I just get one answer(it should be 3) and I don't know what the article meant by wi. What am I missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ali PMPAINT said:
, post: 6177224, member: 661503"]
Problem Statement: the answer to y^3+py+q=0
Relevant Equations: Picture

View attachment 243310
So, you can prove it by using (v+c)^3-3vc(v+c)-(v^3+c^3)=0, where v+c=y and -3vc=p and v^3+c^3=q.
I think you have a sign error. ##-(v^3 + c^3)## should be ##+(v^3 + c^3)## according to the substitution you show
ali PMPAINT said:
The problem is, when I try to solve a one, I just get one answer(it should be 3) and I don't know what the article meant by wi. What am I missing?
It says that ##w_i## is one of the cube roots of unity (1). In polar form these are
##w_0= 1##
##w_1 = \cos(\frac {2\pi}3) + i\sin(\frac {2\pi}3)##
##w_2 = \cos(\frac {4\pi}3) + i\sin(\frac {4\pi}3)##
Notice that two of these roots are complex.
If you raise any of these to the 3rd power, you get 1.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: ali PMPAINT
ali PMPAINT said:
So, you can prove it by using (v+c)^3-3vc(v+c)-(v^3+c^3)=0, where v+c=y and -3vc=p and v^3+c^3=q.
Mark44 said:
I think you have a sign error. −(v3+c3)−(v3+c3)-(v^3 + c^3) should be +(v3+c3)+(v3+c3)+(v^3 + c^3) according to the substitution you show.
... or that should say: ##\ -(v^3+c^3) = q \, . ##

Also, for the casual reader, this expression, given by OP, is an identity : ##\ (v+c)^3-3vc(v+c)-(v^3+c^3)=0\, . ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ali PMPAINT
Mark44 said:
I think you have a sign error. ##-(v^3 + c^3)## should be ##+(v^3 + c^3)## according to the substitution you show
Yes, thanks for correcting me.

Mark44 said:
It says that ##w_i## is one of the cube roots of unity (1). In polar form these are
##w_0= 1##
##w_1 = \cos(\frac {2\pi}3) + i\sin(\frac {2\pi}3)##
##w_2 = \cos(\frac {4\pi}3) + i\sin(\frac {4\pi}3)##
Notice that two of these roots are complex.
If you raise any of these to the 3rd power, you get 1.
So, I am now familiar a lot with polar form, so if we got an answer like 1 for example, do you set it equal to e^(ix)=cos(x)+isin(x) ?
 
ali PMPAINT said:
Yes, thanks for correcting me.So, I am now familiar a lot with polar form, so if we got an answer like 1 for example, do you set it equal to e^(ix)=cos(x)+isin(x) ?
Here x is 0, so ##e^{i0} = \cos(0) + i\sin(0) = 1 + i0 = 1##
 
Mark44 said:
Here x is 0, so ##e^{i0} = \cos(0) + i\sin(0) = 1 + i0 = 1##
Yes, but what about the other two answers?
For example, how to get all solutions for x^3+2x-3=0 ?
 
Last edited:
ali PMPAINT said:
Yes, but what about the other two answers?
For example, how to get all solutions for x^3+2x-3=0 ?
do you know what synthetic division is?
 
ali PMPAINT said:
Yes, but what about the other two answers?
For example, how to get all solutions for x^3+2x-3=0 ?
You included the formula in your first post of this thread. I gave you all three roots of unity in my previous post. Just use that formula, once for each of ##w_0, w_1, w_2##.
 
ali PMPAINT said:
Mark44 said:
It says that ##w_i## is one of the cube roots of unity (1). In polar form these are
##w_0= 1##
##w_1 = \cos(\frac {2\pi}3) + i\sin(\frac {2\pi}3)##
##w_2 = \cos(\frac {4\pi}3) + i\sin(\frac {4\pi}3)##
Notice that two of these roots are complex.
If you raise any of these to the 3rd power, you get 1.

So, I am now familiar a lot with polar forms, so if we got an answer like 1 for example, do you set it equal to e^(ix)=cos(x)+isin(x) ?
Mark44 said:
Here x is 0, so ##e^{i0} = \cos(0) + i\sin(0) = 1 + i0 = 1##
ali PMPAINT said:
Yes, but what about the other two answers?
You can get ##w_1## by letting x = 2π/3 in the polar form you gave, which was: e^(ix)=cos(x)+isin(x)

Then ##w_1 = \cos(\frac {2\pi}3) + i\sin(\frac {2\pi}3)## which is the same as ##\displaystyle e^{2\pi i / 3} ##

It then follows that ##\displaystyle {w_1}^3=\left( e^{2\pi i / 3} \right) ^3 = e^{2\pi i } =1 ##
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: ali PMPAINT
  • #10
SammyS said:
You can get ##w_1## by letting x = 2π/3 in the polar form you gave, which was: e^(ix)=cos(x)+isin(x)

Then ##w_1 = \cos(\frac {2\pi}3) + i\sin(\frac {2\pi}3)## which is the same as ##\displaystyle e^{2\pi i / 3} ##

It then follows that ##\displaystyle {w_1}^3=\left( e^{2\pi i / 3} \right) ^3 = e^{2\pi i } =1 ##
Thanks, but now I'm facing another problem. When I tried to solve for x^3+2x-3=0 I got:
243371

I calculated it with a calculator and I got 1 out of this mess(which is true). No matter what I do, I can't simplify the expresion to get 1. And, I found that the other two roots are number 2 (by both calculator and another methods), but I tried to multiply it with ##w_1 = \cos(\frac {2\pi}3) + i\sin(\frac {2\pi}3)## with one, but I got a wrong result (-1/2+i 3^(0.5)/2 ) which is wrong. Where am I making a mistake?
I am sorry if I am asking a lot, but I really want to know how to solve cubic equations by radicals.
 
  • #11
ali PMPAINT said:
Thanks, but now I'm facing another problem. When I tried to solve for x^3+2x-3=0 I got:
View attachment 243371
I calculated it with a calculator and I got 1 out of this mess(which is true). No matter what I do, I can't simplify the expresion to get 1. And, I found that the other two roots are number 2 (by both calculator and another methods),
Yes, 1 is a solution of the equation ##x^3 + 2x - 3 = 0##, because if you replace x by 1, you get 0 = 0, which is a true statement.
However, 2 is not a solution of this equation, despite what your calculator and another method imply. The reason is that if you replace x in the equation by 2, you get ##2^3 + 2(2) - 3 = 9 \ne 0##.

Knowing that x = 1 is a solution, that means that (x - 1) is a factor of ##x^3 + 2x - 3##. If you divide the cubic polynomial by (x - 1), either by long division or by synthetic division that @StoneTemplePython mentioned, you get a quadratic polynomial that you can break down using the Quadratic Formula. The other two solutions of your equation are complex.
ali PMPAINT said:
but I tried to multiply it with ##w_1 = \cos(\frac {2\pi}3) + i\sin(\frac {2\pi}3)## with one, but I got a wrong result (-1/2+i 3^(0.5)/2 ) which is wrong. Where am I making a mistake?
I am sorry if I am asking a lot, but I really want to know how to solve cubic equations by radicals.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: ali PMPAINT
  • #12
ali PMPAINT said:
Thanks, but now I'm facing another problem. When I tried to solve for x^3+2x-3=0 I got:
View attachment 243371
I calculated it with a calculator and I got 1 out of this mess(which is true). No matter what I do, I can't simplify the expresion to get 1. And, I found that the other two roots are number 2 (by both calculator and another methods), but I tried to multiply it with ##w_1 = \cos(\frac {2\pi}3) + i\sin(\frac {2\pi}3)## with one, but I got a wrong result (-1/2+i 3^(0.5)/2 ) which is wrong. Where am I making a mistake?
I am sorry if I am asking a lot, but I really want to know how to solve cubic equations by radicals.
Yes. the above expression gives you 1 (unity).

It looks like the given expression is incorrect.
The correct results for the two complex solutions to ##x^3+2x-3=0## are ## \displaystyle x= \frac{-1 \pm i \sqrt{11}\,}{2} \,.##

A correct form for the solution to the cubic equation: ##x^3+px+q=0## is:

## \displaystyle w_k \left({\sqrt[{3}]{-{q \over 2}+{\sqrt {{q^{2} \over 4}+{p^{3} \over 27}}}}}+ w_k{\sqrt[{3}]{-{q \over 2}-{\sqrt {{q^{2} \over 4}+{p^{3} \over 27}}}} }\ \right) \ ,
\\ \displaystyle \text{where } w_k=e^{2k\pi i /3} \ .##

Note that for ##k \in \{1,\,2,\,3\,\},\ \ w_k ## is one of the three cube roots of unity.

The above may be expressed in a variety of forms.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: ali PMPAINT
  • #13
Oh yes, my bad, apparently I calculated the roots of x^3-3x+2=0 instead of x^3+2x-3=0 and missed the sign (don't blame me, they are too similar)
SammyS said:
A correct form for the solution to the cubic equation: ##x^3+px+q=0## is:

## \displaystyle w_k \left({\sqrt[{3}]{-{q \over 2}+{\sqrt {{q^{2} \over 4}+{p^{3} \over 27}}}}}+ w_k{\sqrt[{3}]{-{q \over 2}-{\sqrt {{q^{2} \over 4}+{p^{3} \over 27}}}} }\ \right) \ ,
\\ \displaystyle \text{where } w_k=e^{2k\pi i /3} \ .##

So, I think that I had a mistake in my proof, and it doesn't give me a correct answer for more than two answers:
243474

Where is my mistake?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
307
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K