Solving Vector Calculus: (a+2b)∇(∇⋅u) - b∇x∇xu - (3a+2b)c∇T(r)=0

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the vector calculus equation: (a + 2b)∇(∇⋅u) - b∇×∇×u - (3a + 2b)c∇T(r) = 0. Participants emphasize the importance of recognizing that ∇(∇⋅u) - ∇×∇×u simplifies to ∇²u. A suggested approach involves solving for ∇×∇×u, substituting it back into the equation, and simplifying to achieve the form (a + b)∇(∇⋅u) + b∇²u - (3a + 2b)c∇T(r) = 0. The discussion highlights the potential for further simplification by manipulating the constants involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, specifically the divergence and curl operations.
  • Familiarity with the Laplacian operator and its application in vector fields.
  • Knowledge of constants and their manipulation in mathematical equations.
  • Experience with simplifying complex vector equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties and applications of the Laplacian operator in vector calculus.
  • Learn techniques for simplifying vector equations involving divergence and curl.
  • Explore the implications of manipulating constants in vector calculus equations.
  • Investigate advanced topics in vector calculus, such as Green's Theorem and Stokes' Theorem.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are working with vector calculus and seeking to solve complex vector equations.

mcfc
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I'm unsure how to do this problem:

(a + 2b)\nabla(\nabla \cdot \vec u) - b \nabla \times \nabla \times \vec u - (3a + 2b)c\nabla T(r)= \vec 0
\hat u = U_r \hat r + u_\theta \hat \theta +u_z \hat z
a,b,c constants
how would I solve this for u?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i know that \nabla(\nabla\bullet\vec{u}) - \nabla\times\nabla\times\vec{u} = \nabla^{2}\vec{u}

i dunno, what about this?..

Solve this equation for \nabla\times\nabla\times\vec{u}, then substitute into your equation, and simplify the resulting equation. The first term of your equation should reduce to (a+b)\nabla(\nabla\bullet\vec{u}) +b\nabla^{2}\vec{u} - (3a+2b)c\nablaT(r) = 0.

You should be able to write out the laplacian explicitly and simplify all the individual components. If you can find some way to turn the value (3a+2b) into (3a+3b) you could probably simplify things a lot.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K