Solving x^3 +5x -4 to Get Root 0.3274

  • Thread starter Thread starter RMHAZARD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Root
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the equation x^3 + 5x - 4 to find a specific root, approximately 0.3274. The original poster is comparing different methods for finding roots as part of their coursework, specifically mentioning the change of sign method and the Newton-Raphson method, while expressing difficulty with the rearranging method.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster describes their attempts to rearrange the equation to converge on the root but is struggling with the method. Some participants seek clarification on what the "rearranging method" entails, while others explain it in terms of the g(x) method and graph intersections. There are discussions about finding roots through integer searches and iterative methods.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring various interpretations of the rearranging method and discussing its application. Some guidance has been offered regarding the g(x) method and the iterative process, but there is no explicit consensus on the best approach to take. The original poster is still seeking clarity on how to proceed with their coursework.

Contextual Notes

The original poster is under time constraints as their coursework is due soon, which adds pressure to their attempts to understand and apply the rearranging method effectively.

RMHAZARD
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I am on my final part of my C3 coursework, doing the comparison of methods, i have found the root using the change of sign method, and the Newton raphson method but i am struggling with using the rearranging method. the equation i am using is x^3 +5x -4, i have tried rearranging it to get the root which is 0.3274, but i can not get it to converge to this figure, the coursework is due in tomorrow at 4pm and i just need to do this final bit and i am done but i can't i have been tring for 3 hours please help me.

Thanks

I am not asking for it to be done for me i am just asking to know whati need to do to my equation to get my root 0.3274.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Show me Newton-raphson with your equation.
 
I have no idea what you mean by the "rearranging method". Please explain.
 
Hes talking about the g(x) method. You make your equation in the form x = ... then find points of interception on the graph y = x. These interceptions are the roots of the orignal equation.

You need to find a root between 2 points using a integer search. Take the x value from the search and put it into the x = equation. then take that value and put it into the equation again until it converges to 5/6 DP.

eg x=x^3-2x/3
x = (-1, 0)
x0 = -1
x1 = -1^3-2*-1/3 = n
x2 = n^3-2*n/3 etc.
 
madmike159 said:
Hes talking about the g(x) method. You make your equation in the form x = ... then find points of interception on the graph y = x. These interceptions are the roots of the orignal equation.

You need to find a root between 2 points using a integer search. Take the x value from the search and put it into the x = equation. then take that value and put it into the equation again until it converges to 5/6 DP.

eg x=x^3-2x/3
x = (-1, 0)
x0 = -1
x1 = -1^3-2*-1/3 = n
x2 = n^3-2*n/3 etc.
What function are you talking about? x= x3- 2x/3 is equivalent to x3- (2/3)x- x= 0 or x3- (5/3)x= 0 which has NO roots between -1 and 0. The method you give will eventually converge to 0 which is a root.
 
No I was giving an exampe of the steps you take. I didn't want to give him somthing that worked because it is course work, he can get marked down if some on did it for him. It works in the same way s the Newton Raphson method (gets a closer value every time) but isn' as quick.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K