What is the significance of the iron ring worn by Canadian engineers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ThomasG
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The significance of the iron ring worn by Canadian engineers lies in its symbolism of humility and the recognition of the responsibilities that come with the profession. This tradition emphasizes the importance of practical knowledge, such as understanding Ohm's Law and basic circuit troubleshooting, alongside theoretical concepts like Maxwell's equations and digital logic design. Engineers are encouraged to specialize in one area of passion while maintaining a broad foundational knowledge. The iron ring serves as a constant reminder to guard against hubris, as it is made from iron sourced from a failed machine.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Ohm's Law and basic electrical principles
  • Familiarity with Maxwell's equations in electromagnetics
  • Knowledge of digital logic design and Verilog programming
  • Basic skills in circuit troubleshooting and soldering techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the history and significance of the iron ring in Canadian engineering
  • Explore advanced topics in electromagnetics and digital logic
  • Learn about practical circuit design and troubleshooting techniques
  • Study the principles of computer architecture and data cache design
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for electrical engineering students, educators, and professionals seeking to understand the cultural significance of the iron ring and the foundational knowledge required for a successful engineering career.

ThomasG
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I am going to school for electrical engineering and I have asked this question a lot and I have not gotten a straight answer. Is there something that an electrical engineer MUST know or is expected to know before entering the field of engineering? I am going to school and wanted to know if there is something I should know before I graduate school. I have a lot of class's I can take and I have a lot of resources. Is there anything I should most defiantly do before I graduate? Thank You for every one how has answered this.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
V=ir
 
Greg-ulate said:
V=ir

Yep, that's it all right (except I write it is E=IR)
 
Don't treat EM as a class that you just have to creep through to get the degree, instead embrace it and spend more time trying to understand it. Be good in the required math, don't just pass the class.
If you are more hardware and firmware inclined, take more computer classes.
 
I agree that if you are holding a degree in EE and don't know Ohm's law than something went seriously wrong. Many of us learned this well before we entered college.

However, here is how I would answer this:

An engineer is expected to have one subject, or one topic, that he/she is passionate about and can discuss at a reasonably high level.

If it is electromagnetics then perhaps you can write Maxwell's equations on the whiteboard and talk intelligently about them. Perhaps you can give an analogy of what divergence and curl are.

If it is digital logic then perhaps you can sketch out the circuit of a binary counter using flip-flops. Perhaps you can write a state machine in verilog. Perhaps you can discuss some of the history of digital logic.

If it is computer architecture than perhaps you can talk about all of the tradeoffs in how data cache is designed.

Get the idea?

There are many specialty areas in EE, and many topics within each area. We are not expected to be passionate and knowledgeable about everything.

Pick one area to be passionate about and be able go deep. The Internet makes this very easy for your generation, take advantage.

You do not want to be asked in an interview "what was your favorite class" and answer "I dunno".
 
Last edited:
I think study as general as possible. I don't think people know exactly what they like until they really get into the subject. I myself started as firmware/hardware, more into software. Then I change after a few years to more mixed signal. Then I change to RF microwave. Foundation is what's important. You can have an idea what you like, but study as broad as possible.
 
I once mentored a freshout who had a master's from Princeton but didn't know the color code.
 
skeptic2 said:
I once mentored a freshout who had a master's from Princeton but didn't know the color code.

Then he wasn't an EE, he was a theorist (or more appropriately he was only theoretically an engineer :smile:)
 
Know the difference between 'defiantly' and 'definitely'.
 
  • #10
SteamKing said:
Know the difference between 'defiantly' and 'definitely'.

:smile: You are asking WAY too much of an engineer. :smile:
 
  • #11
Spend some time in the Physics lab.
 
  • #12
Basic physics is the foundation for all disciplines of engineering, i would say.
Soo,,,,
Understand Newton's laws, gas laws, and balancing chemical reaction equations from your high school classes. Get yourself really sharp in Algebra 'cause that's the hardest part of calculus.

I once mentored a freshout who had a master's from Princeton but didn't know the color code.
Such pratical things , including soldering technique and circuit troubleshooting, are sadly not taught.
Whenever we spilt the resistor trays at my plant I assigned a summer student to put them all back. At first they are indignant but years later one of them told me "Thanks for making me learn the color code". (It should be as automatic as reading printed text)

Learn to write a business letter.

AND last but not least, don't let education go to your head. Canadian engineers have a nice tradition - they wear a ring on little finger of left hand , made from iron that comes from a machine that has failed.
It's a reminder for humility - pinky is the the least dexterous finger of generally less dexterous hand, iron is the most humble metal, and the "from a failed machine" is to guard against false pride (hubris).


old jim
 
  • #13
"what's the difference between electrical and electronic engineering" - that's the only question I was asked.
 
  • #14
phinds said:
Then he wasn't an EE, he was a theorist (or more appropriately he was only theoretically an engineer :smile:)

No, he was just an EE. The first project we did together was to design a test fixture to measure the amount of hysteresis of Schmidt triggers.
 
  • #15
the_emi_guy said:
I agree that if you are holding a degree in EE and don't know Ohm's law than something went seriously wrong. Many of us learned this well before we entered college.

However, here is how I would answer this:

An engineer is expected to have one subject, or one topic, that he/she is passionate about and can discuss at a reasonably high level.

If it is electromagnetics then perhaps you can write Maxwell's equations on the whiteboard and talk intelligently about them. Perhaps you can give an analogy of what divergence and curl are.

If it is digital logic then perhaps you can sketch out the circuit of a binary counter using flip-flops. Perhaps you can write a state machine in verilog. Perhaps you can discuss some of the history of digital logic.

If it is computer architecture than perhaps you can talk about all of the tradeoffs in how data cache is designed.

Get the idea?

There are many specialty areas in EE, and many topics within each area. We are not expected to be passionate and knowledgeable about everything.

Pick one area to be passionate about and be able go deep. The Internet makes this very easy for your generation, take advantage.

You do not want to be asked in an interview "what was your favorite class" and answer "I dunno".

Thank You very much everyone it was a lot of help. And thank you very much the_emi_guy !
 
  • #16
There are at least 2 ways to any answer - strive to "see" the connections. When you fail - you have only recognized a true challenge and NO argument is invalid...they all have merit..they may not be correct - but that is the mission - convince they are wrong or learn and accept their point of view... oh wait... that it the intellectual life!
 
  • #17
jim hardy said:
Canadian engineers have a nice tradition - they wear a ring on little finger of left hand , made from iron that comes from a machine that has failed.
It's a reminder for humility - pinky is the the least dexterous finger of generally less dexterous hand, iron is the most humble metal, and the "from a failed machine" is to guard against false pride (hubris).
And should they not heed the first lesson, the boss has them place that hand in the vicinity of an alternating magnetic field? :wink:
http://img803.imageshack.us/img803/4666/holly1756.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K