Sommerfeld quantisation:relation between energy and potential

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter krishna mohan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Potential
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the dependence of energy on the parameter 'a' in the potential energy function V=ax^4, using the Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization formula. The Hamiltonian is expressed as K + V, where K represents kinetic energy. The derived relationship shows that the total energy E can be expressed as E = (nh√a)/(√(2m)π), indicating that the energy levels are quantized and depend on the parameter 'a' as well as the quantum number 'n'. The discussion also touches on the implications of angular momentum in quantum mechanics, particularly in relation to the hydrogen atom model.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Familiarity with the Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization condition
  • Knowledge of potential energy functions, specifically V=ax^4
  • Basic concepts of angular momentum in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization formula in detail
  • Explore the implications of potential energy functions in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about angular momentum quantization in the context of the hydrogen atom
  • Investigate the relationship between energy levels and potential parameters in various quantum systems
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers interested in the quantization of energy levels and the implications of potential energy functions in quantum systems.

krishna mohan
Messages
114
Reaction score
0
I found the following question in a question paper.

If the potential experienced by a particle in one dimension is given by [tex]ax^4[/tex], how does the energy of the particle depend on the parameter a? Use Bohr-Sommerfeld quantisation formula.. I know how to find the dependence of energy on n, the integer that occurs in the quantisation.

But how does it depend on a?

Since
Hamiltonian is [tex]\ K+V[/tex] ,
Energy is [tex]\ K+ax^4[/tex].

I don't know what else I can say.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For example, in the harmonic oscillator, the potential V is,
[tex]V = ax^2 = \frac{1}{2}m \omega^{2}x^2[/tex]
So, the total energy is,
[tex]E= K+V = \frac{p_{x}^2}{2m}+\frac{1}{2}m \omega^{2}x^2(=ax^2)[/tex]

As shown in this thread, The Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization formula is, (in a quarter period)
[tex]\oint p_{x}dx = nh \to \sqrt{2m}\int_{0}^{\sqrt{\frac{E}{a}}}\sqrt{E-ax^2}dx = \frac{1}{4}nh[/tex]

change the variable to [tex]\theta[/tex] as follows,
[tex]\sqrt{\frac{a}{E}}x=sin\theta, \quad E\sqrt{\frac{2m}{a}}\int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}}cos^2\theta d\theta =\frac{\sqrt{2m}E\pi}{4\sqrt{a}}=\frac{1}{4}nh[/tex]

So if we erase the a, the the total energy E is,
[tex]E=\frac{nh\sqrt{a}}{\sqrt{2m}\pi}=\frac{nh\omega}{2\pi}=n\hbar\omega[/tex]

This result shows the interval of the energy E is [tex]\hbar\omega[/tex]

But as shown in the ground state electron of the Bohr hydrogen model, the electron has the orbital angular momentum 1 (x [tex]\hbar[/tex]) instead of the spin 1/2. So we have to consider the minimum rotation (not 1-D) in the Bohr model.

This magnetic moment which can be measured by the experiment is the same as the QM hydrogen model because the magnetic moments(angular momentum x g-factor) are 1 x 1 (in the Bor model) = 1/2 x 2 (in the QM model).
If the angular momentum is [tex]\hbar[/tex], the electron naturally return by one rotation as follows, (also in the result of this experiment)

[tex]L_{z}(=-i\hbar\frac{d}{d\varphi})\phi_{m}(\varphi) = m\hbar\phi_{m}(\varphi), \to \quad \phi_{m}(\varphi)=e^{im\varphi}[/tex]

Sorry, the case of [tex]V=ax^4[/tex] is a little complicated, so I'm glad if you calculate like this, and tell me the result.
 
My question was not about the dependence on the quantum number n obtained from the quantisation condition...

It was about the dependence of the energy on the parameter a in the Hamiltonian..that is the potential energy being given as [tex]a x^4[/tex]...



As for dependence on n, it can be easily accomplished..see this video...at around the thirty minute mark...

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K