Source free RL circuit confusion When this switch closes, does the current end?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on analyzing a RL circuit where a switch is opened after being closed for a long time. The key points include understanding that when the switch is closed, the inductor behaves as a short circuit, allowing current Io to equal IL. The potential difference across the 50-ohm resistor is 100V, which simplifies the calculation of current through it without needing to consider the 10-ohm and 20-ohm resistors, as they do not affect Io directly. This clarification helps resolve confusion regarding current branching in the circuit.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of RL circuits and inductor behavior
  • Knowledge of Ohm's Law and voltage division
  • Familiarity with circuit analysis techniques
  • Ability to interpret circuit diagrams
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the behavior of inductors in transient circuits
  • Learn about voltage division in series circuits
  • Explore the concept of short circuits in electrical engineering
  • Investigate the impact of resistors on current flow in parallel circuits
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of RL circuits and transient analysis.

mr_coffee
Messages
1,613
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone. I'm getting confused on what my professor did. Everything else makes sense to me but this one part. THe directions say:
Aftering having been closed for a long time, the switch in the circuit is opened at t= 0. (a) find IL(t) for t>0, (b) Evaluate IL(10ms).

I got both parts right. Here is my work and the circuit:
http://img119.imageshack.us/img119/7361/lastscan2at.jpg


Okay if you look at t<0, you assume the inductor is short circuit, that's what those 2 little dots mean instead of the curly inductor symbol. THe current Io = IL. So when the switch is closed, if you notice the circuit is redrawn, with the 20 and 10 resistors in series not even in the circuit. When that switch is closed for along time, its DC current. But wouldn't the current branch off into 2 parts? 1 going into the 20 + 10 resistors on the left and another current going to the right through the 50 ohm resistor and then going into where the inductor was?

What I'm confused on is why U can just say screw those other resistors, Io isn't affected by them. Any explanation? Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
mr_coffee said:
Hello everyone. I'm getting confused on what my professor did. Everything else makes sense to me but this one part. THe directions say:
Aftering having been closed for a long time, the switch in the circuit is opened at t= 0. (a) find IL(t) for t>0, (b) Evaluate IL(10ms).

I got both parts right. Here is my work and the circuit:
http://img119.imageshack.us/img119/7361/lastscan2at.jpg


Okay if you look at t<0, you assume the inductor is short circuit, that's what those 2 little dots mean instead of the curly inductor symbol. THe current Io = IL. So when the switch is closed, if you notice the circuit is redrawn, with the 20 and 10 resistors in series not even in the circuit. When that switch is closed for along time, its DC current. But wouldn't the current branch off into 2 parts? 1 going into the 20 + 10 resistors on the left and another current going to the right through the 50 ohm resistor and then going into where the inductor was?

What I'm confused on is why U can just say screw those other resistors, Io isn't affected by them. Any explanation? Thanks!

It`s not that the 10 and 20 ohms disappear. It is simply that the potential difference across the 50 ohms is 100 V (and the potential difference across the 10 and 20 ohms combined is also 100 volts). Do you see this? (it`s clear since the terminals of the battery are directly connected across the 50 ohms). So if you only want the current across the 50 ohms, you simply divide 100V by 50 ohms. However, at the same time, the current through the other two resistors is 100V/30 ohms = 3.33 A. But you did not need that information to proceed so there was no need to calculate it.

Hope this helps

Pat
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ahhh i c now! thanks Pat, helped a lot!
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
13K