Space Dilation in General Relativity: Facts, Measurement & Sources

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Zman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dilation Gr Space
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the concepts of space dilation and contraction in the context of General Relativity (GR) and Special Relativity (SR). Participants explore the implications of these concepts on light behavior near massive bodies, the measurement of these effects, and the terminology used in physics to describe these phenomena.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that space contracts around large bodies and dilates further away, questioning the logical basis and measurement of this claim.
  • Another participant asserts that experiments have shown light bending around massive objects, suggesting that it is space that bends rather than light itself.
  • A question is raised about whether space needs to be more contracted near a massive body for light to curve.
  • It is argued that light travels in straight lines (geodesics) and that the term "contracted" is misleading; instead, curvature of space-time is emphasized.
  • Discussion touches on the distinction between contraction in SR and curvature in GR, with a participant asserting that curvature does not affect volume but changes geodesic paths.
  • Another participant clarifies that in SR, space does not contract but objects appear contracted due to relativistic effects, and that curvature may affect volume under certain conditions involving energy or pressure.
  • A reference to the difference between Weyl and Ricci curvature is made, with implications for volume effects being mentioned.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the terminology and implications of space contraction and curvature, with no consensus reached on the definitions or effects of these concepts in GR and SR.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of the terms used in physics, noting that the implications of curvature and contraction may depend on specific definitions and contexts, particularly regarding volume and geodesics.

Zman
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
I have read in various places that according to General Relativity space contracts around large bodies. And moving further out of the gravitational field, space dilates.

What is the logical basis for this?
Is it in fact even true and can it be measured?
Does anybody know of any sources on the web that cover this topic?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It can and has been measured in various experiments, that show light to "Bend" (it is of course not light, but space that is bending) around massive objects such as the sun. Someone with more experience of experiments related to Relativity may be able to enlighten you further.

V
 
I see what you are saying but does distorted space near a body need to be more contracted than further away from the body for light to curve?
 
Light does not bend, relative to space, light travels in straight lines (known as Geodesics). Instead, when space bends, light APPEARS to bend, even though it's really going straight, relative to space. "Contracted" is a bad word to use in this context, generally physicists talk about the curvature of space-time. Yes, space nearer a massive body will be more curved, and therefore the gravitational force will be stronger.

V
 
Varnick said:
"Contracted" is a bad word to use in this context, generally physicists talk about the curvature of space-time. Yes, space nearer a massive body will be more curved, and therefore the gravitational force will be stronger.

V

From what you are saying, physicists in GR don't refer explicitly to contraction of space but instead to curvature of space. Whereas in SR contraction of space is considered a valid description of space-time.
I presume that curvature of space in GR has no implications as to volume?
 
In SR, space doesn't contract, things contract in space (such as hypothetical spaceships going at relativistic speeds). Curvature does not affect volume, no, it merely changes the geodesic paths on the space-time manifold.

V
 
Thanks V
 
In SR, space doesn't contract, things contract in space (such as hypothetical spaceships going at relativistic speeds).
No, in SR space alone (not spacetime) is seen contracted by anybody who does not define space as orthogonal to his worldline, but skewed. Things would never contract, they aren't allowed to by the relativity principle. They simply look different (in the sense of "are measured differently").
Curvature does not affect volume, no, it merely changes the geodesic paths on the space-time manifold.
Curvature may well affect volume, whatever this means (Trace(Rij) <>0 in this case). But only if energy or pressure are inside the volume. Outside of masses, volumes get distorted, but not changed in size.
 
Varnick said:
Curvature does not affect volume, no, it merely changes the geodesic paths on the space-time manifold.
You might want to lookup the difference between Weyl and Ricci curvature. Ricci curvature certainly can have volume reducing effects.
 
  • #10
Thanks MeJennifer, I'll look into that.

V
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
7K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K