Relativity Spacetime Physics and Black Hole Physics

AI Thread Summary
The American Journal of Physics has announced that "Space Time Physics" by Taylor and Wheeler and "Exploring Black Holes" by Taylor, Wheeler, and Bertschinger are now available for free, which is seen as a valuable resource for students and enthusiasts. Comparisons are made between these books and Sean Carroll's work, as well as the Misner-Thorne-Wheeler textbook, which is regarded as a definitive reference for General Relativity (GR). While Taylor and Wheeler's texts are considered insightful and accessible, they are viewed as lower level compared to Misner-Thorne-Wheeler, which, despite its age, remains essential. However, it is suggested that readers should supplement it with newer literature to stay updated on advancements in areas like Cosmology and gravitational-wave research.
vanhees71
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
24,488
Reaction score
15,057
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes CalcNerd, Demystifier, Ibix and 2 others
Physics news on Phys.org
I studied from Sean Carrol book and use misner-thorne-wheeler book as a reference, how would you compare these two to them?
 
Taylor and Wheeler are good books and very insightful, but lower level.
 
Misner-Thorne-Wheeler is THE reference for GR though it's pretty old and thus should be supplemented with some newer book if it comes to the topics where physicists have made tremendous progress over the years, particularly Cosmology and gravitational-wave research.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby
Black Holes, information and the string theory revolution(ch14) is good.
 
TL;DR Summary: Book after Sakurai Modern Quantum Physics I am doing a comprehensive reading of sakurai and I have solved every problem from chapters I finished on my own, I will finish the book within 2 weeks and I want to delve into qft and other particle physics related topics, not from summaries but comprehensive books, I will start a graduate program related to cern in 3 months, I alreadily knew some qft but now I want to do it, hence do a good book with good problems in it first...
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
577
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
8K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top