Special Relativity Forces and Energy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on deriving the energy equation γmc² − α/r = constant for motion under a pure inverse square law force f = −αr/r³. The user initially attempts to integrate the force equation but encounters a sign error. The confusion arises from the use of the symbol "E," which represents different concepts in the context of energy and force. Ultimately, the correct approach involves applying the chain rule to account for the time dependence of the variable r.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity, particularly the concept of relativistic energy (γmc²).
  • Familiarity with classical mechanics and inverse square law forces.
  • Knowledge of calculus, specifically integration and the chain rule.
  • Ability to differentiate between variables in physics equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of energy equations in special relativity.
  • Learn about the application of the chain rule in physics problems.
  • Explore the implications of inverse square law forces in classical mechanics.
  • Review common pitfalls in variable notation and symbol usage in physics.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying special relativity and classical mechanics, as well as educators seeking to clarify common misconceptions in energy equations.

jeffbarrington
Messages
23
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Hi, I have this problem:

For motion under a pure (rest mass preserving) inverse square law force f = −αr/r3 , where α is a constant, derive the energy equation γmc2 − α/r = constant.

Homework Equations


E = γmc2
dE/dt = f.u for a pure force

The Attempt at a Solution


I start by saying:

dE/dt = f.u = f.dr/dt

Next, I know f is independent of time, so I can just integrate this to get:

E = f.r +constant

So then you get:

γmc2 = -α/r + constant

Which is painfully close to the result I'm meant to get but out by a minus sign. I don't know if I've made an error here or if the question is erroneous.

Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like there's some symbol-related confusion here.
You have 2 different variables both named "E".
 
DuckAmuck said:
Looks like there's some symbol-related confusion here.
You have 2 different variables both named "E".
Really? I don't understand how that's the case, they're both the particle's energy.

edit - I actually get something viable by considering dE/dt = grad(E) dot dr/dt, since r is a function of time and I forgot to chain rule it.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K