Special relativity — Observer measuring the velocity of a passing rocket

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the interpretation of Equation 2.51 in the context of special relativity, specifically regarding the definition of the Lorentz factor, gamma (γ). It clarifies that -γ represents the inner product of two four-vectors, which is crucial for expressing velocity in a covariant form. This formulation is beneficial for generalizing concepts across various coordinate systems and curved spacetime. The conversation also touches on the Euclidean interpretation of gamma and its relation to rapidities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity concepts, particularly four-vectors.
  • Familiarity with the Lorentz factor (γ) and its significance in relativistic physics.
  • Knowledge of covariant forms and their applications in different coordinate systems.
  • Basic grasp of hyperbolic functions, particularly cosh and tanh.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of the Lorentz factor (γ) in special relativity.
  • Explore the properties of four-vectors and their applications in physics.
  • Learn about the significance of covariant formulations in general relativity.
  • Investigate the relationship between rapidities and velocities in relativistic contexts.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying special relativity, as well as educators and researchers looking to deepen their understanding of four-vectors and covariant formulations in relativistic physics.

LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
163
Homework Statement
There is a print just below
Relevant Equations
\n
1605347546126.png

I am a little confused with the text above. Actually, all is ok until 2.51, i think i am missing something.
What is this? Another way to define gamma? (The doubt is not about the raising indices, neither about "n00 = -1", is just where does the equation came from. That is, the equation is easy to understand, but i don't know from where this come from)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Herculi said:
Homework Statement:: There is a print just below
Relevant Equations:: \n

View attachment 272605
I am a little confused with the text above. Actually, all is ok until 2.51, i think i am missing something.
What is this? Another way to define gamma? (The doubt is not about the raising indices, neither about "n00 = -1", is just where does the equation came from. That is, the equation is easy to understand, but i don't know from where this come from)
Equation 2.51 is simply highlighting that ##-\gamma## equals the inner product of the two four vectors. It's easy to work out.

By noticing this you have ##\gamma## (and hence ##v##) expressed in a manifestly covariant form. As the inner product is independent of coordinates, this is useful for generalising toall coordinate systems and to curved spacetime.
 
It might be helpful to consider the Euclidean version of (2.51).
\gamma_{euc}=\hat U \cdot \hat V =\cos\theta_{\scriptsize{\rm between\ U\ and\ V}}<br /> =\displaystyle\frac{1}{\sqrt{1+\tan^2\theta_{rel}}}<br /> =\displaystyle\frac{1}{\sqrt{1+m_{rel}^2}}<br />

(2.51) interpreted with rapidities (and the (-,+,+,+) signature)
\gamma=-\hat U \cdot \hat V =\cosh\phi_{rel}<br /> =\displaystyle\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\tanh^2\phi_{rel}}}<br /> =\displaystyle\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-v_{rel}^2}}<br />
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
898
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K