Special relativity - Trivial exercise with spacetime interval

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the spacetime interval for Mike's journey from Earth to Pluto at a speed of 0.82c over 33.72 years, as observed from Earth. Participants highlight the importance of distinguishing between proper quantities, which are measured in the traveler's frame, and apparent quantities, which are measured in the observer's frame. A key point is that the time given (33.72 years) is in the Earth frame, and using it directly in the traveler's frame leads to confusion. The correct approach requires applying the Lorentz transformation rather than simple time dilation. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the necessity of maintaining consistent reference frames in special relativity calculations.
LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
162
Homework Statement
.
Relevant Equations
.
For a observer on Earth, a rocket takes Mike from Earth to Pluto with a speed of 0.82 c for 33.72 yr. Find the space-time interval for the two events such as Mike leaving the Earth and reaching Pluto considering Pluto is at rest relative to Earth for the observer on Earth.

I confess that i am rather confused reading this question. See:
$$(1) \implies \Delta S² \text{is invariant}.$$
Knowing (1), i thought that the better approach to this question would be to use the framework of the traveller. In his framework, and probably here is my error, i think:

(2) the time it takes, IN HIS FRAMEWORK, to travel, was 33.72 yr (PS: The reasoning i used to conclude that is basically the symmetry of the lorentz transformation. The traveller believe he is stopped and the universe is flowing by him, and he measures the time to be 33.72 yr) (PSS: I think that ##\Delta t/\gamma## is the time in his reference frame measured by us, in another words, as it were measured by our point of view, is that right, isn't?)

(3) The distance between both events, to him, is 0 m.

$$Ds^2 = (3*10^8*33.72*R)^2$$, where R is the conversion from years to second.

Apparenttly my answer is wrong. I don't know why and where is my mistake.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem statement says:
Herculi said:
For a observer on Earth, a rocket takes Mike from Earth to Pluto with a speed of 0.82 c for 33.72 yr.
You calculate based on the assumption:
Herculi said:
(2) the time it takes, IN HIS FRAMEWORK, to travel, was 33.72 yr
Time dilation is a thing. The difference in the time coordinate for two events depends on the frame of reference that one chooses. You are given figures for velocity and for time difference both relative to the Earth rest frame. You should not interpret them as though they are valid for the traveler's rest frame.

So you have a velocity in the Earth frame and an elapsed time in the Earth frame. That should allow you to compute a distance in the Earth frame.
 
  • Like
Likes Doc Al, LCSphysicist and PeroK
First, I don't understand the numbers. Pluto is not 30 light years from Earth.

Your mistake is to use simple time dilation inappropriately, where the full Lorentz transformation is required.

However, if you are given all the data in one reference frame, why transform to another?
 
  • Like
Likes Doc Al, LCSphysicist and jbriggs444
In special theory of relativity, you have to keep in mind that there are two sets of quantities:
(𝑖) proper quantities are those that are moving with the observer, so no changes are seen;
(𝑖𝑖) apparent quantities are those that move relative to the observer, so changes are noticed.
In the length contraction formula
$$ \dots L = L_0 sqrt{ 1 - \frac { v^2 } { c^2 } } \to L = L_0 \text{ when } v = 0 \dots $$ \\ $$ \dots v = 0 \to \begin{align} (1) & \text{ object whose length is being measured does not move[ /COLOR ] } \\ (2) & \text{ relative to the observer making the measurement } \dots \end{align} $$ \\
$$ \dots v \neq 0 \to \begin{align} (1) & \text{ object whose length is being measured does move[ /COLOR ] } \\ (2) & \text{ relative to the observer making the measurement } \dots \end{align} $$ \\
$$ \to \begin{align} (1) & \rm{ L_0 on the right-hand side of length contraction } \\ (2) & \text { formula is a proper length } \dots \end{align} $$ \\
$$ \to \begin{align} (1) & \text{ 𝐿 on the left-hand side of length contraction } \\ (2) & \text { formula is an apparent length } \dots \end{align} $$ \\
The same thing is true with the time dilation formula t = \frac {t_0} {sqrt{ 1 - \frac { v^2 } { c^2 } } \dots \\
 
In special theory of relativity, you have to keep in mind that there are two sets of quantities:
(𝑖) proper quantities are those that are moving with the observer, so no changes are seen;
(𝑖𝑖) apparent quantities are those that move relative to the observer, so changes are noticed.
In the length contraction formula
##$$ \dots L = L_0 sqrt{ 1 - \frac { v^2 } { c^2 } } \to L = L_0 \text{ when } v = 0 \dots ##
##$$ \\ $$ \dots v = 0 \to \begin{align} (1) & \text{ object whose length is being measured does not move[ /COLOR ] } \nonumber \\ (2) & \text{ relative to the observer making the measurement } \dots \nonumber \end{align} $$ ## \\
##$$ \dots v \neq 0 \to \begin{align} (1) & \text{ object whose length is being measured does move[ /COLOR ] } \nonumber \\ (2) & \text{ relative to the observer making the measurement } \dots \nonumber \end{align} $$ ## \\
##$$ \to \begin{align} (1) & \rm{ L_0 on the right-hand side of length contraction } \nonumber \\ (2) & \text { formula is a proper length } \dots \nonumber \end{align} $$ ## \\
##$$ \to \begin{align} (1) & \text{ 𝐿 on the left-hand side of length contraction } \nonumber \\ (2) & \text { formula is an apparent length } \dots \nonumber \end{align} $$ ## \\
The same thing is true with the time dilation formula ## t = \frac {t_0} {sqrt{ 1 - \frac { v^2 } { c^2 } } \dots ## \\
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top