Specialy theory of relativity [Answer Check]

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a relativistic time dilation problem involving a 30-year-old female astronaut traveling to a star 40 light-years away at 0.90c. The calculations reveal that upon her return, the astronaut will be approximately 68 years old, while her son will be around 88 years old. The key formula used is \(\Delta t = \frac{\Delta t_o}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}\), which helps determine the time experienced by the astronaut compared to her son on Earth. The final ages were confirmed after correcting initial miscalculations regarding the application of time dilation principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity concepts
  • Familiarity with time dilation equations
  • Basic knowledge of kinematics
  • Ability to perform calculations involving light-years and relativistic speeds
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Lorentz transformation equations in detail
  • Learn about the implications of time dilation in practical scenarios
  • Explore the concept of simultaneity in special relativity
  • Investigate the effects of traveling at different fractions of the speed of light
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching special relativity, and anyone interested in understanding the effects of high-speed space travel on time perception.

AClass
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a 30-year old female astronaut leaves her newborn child on Earth and goes on a round-trip voyage to a star that is 40light-years away in a spaceship traveling at 0.90c. what will be the ages of the astronaut and her son when she returns?

Homework Equations



\Delta t = \frac{\Delta t_o}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{ v^2 }{ c^2 }}}

The Attempt at a Solution



40 years (2) +(0.20)(40 years)= 88 years

The astronaut will be 30+88 years = 118 years old when she returns

Using the above equation.

\Delta t = 118 years

v=0.90c

Obtained \Delta t_o = 51.44 years

The astronaut's son will be 51 years old when she returns.

Wondering if I did this correct, I don't have any answers to check from It looks right to me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AClass said:
40 years (2) +(0.20)(40 years)= 88 years
Ummm, I'm not following you there. :rolleyes:
The astronaut will be 30+88 years = 118 years old when she returns
Something went wrong again. You're not applying the right time to the right person.

You might want to just start in the child's frame of reference. Then use x = vt for that frame.
Using the above equation.

\Delta t = 118 years

v=0.90c

Obtained \Delta t_o = 51.44 years

The astronaut's son will be 51 years old when she returns.
No, that's not the right application of the formulas.

For starters, the astronaut will age the slowest.
 
40 years (2) +(0.20)(40 years)= 88 years
Means, the parent is on route for 80 years [40 Years there, then 40 years back], plus since she is traveling 10% slower than the speed of light 20% slower since she is going there and back.

I realize where I went wrong. I went to verify my notes.

The child will be 88 years old.

\Delta t = 88 years [Earth Observer]

Using the equation,

Obtained \Delta t_o = 38.36 Years

Therefore the child will be 88 years old, and the parent will be [30 years+38.36 years] 68 years old.

That should be right. Thanks for the help!
 
AClass said:
40 years (2) +(0.20)(40 years)= 88 years
Means, the parent is on route for 80 years [40 Years there, then 40 years back], plus since she is traveling 10% slower than the speed of light 20% slower since she is going there and back.
That's not the correct math. :rolleyes:

Please, start over. First calculate the total distance (in light years). Then write down the velocity (v = 0.90c). It's also helpful to note that c = 1 ly/y. Now go back to one of your most basic kinematics equations for a uniform velocity, x = vt. Solve for t.
I realize where I went wrong. I went to verify my notes.

The child will be 88 years old.

\Delta t = 88 years [Earth Observer]

Using the equation,

Obtained \Delta t_o = 38.36 Years

Therefore the child will be 88 years old, and the parent will be [30 years+38.36 years] 68 years old.

That should be right. Thanks for the help!
That's almost right. But you should go back and redo the child's age for better precision. It's not exactly 88 years. :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K