What if the speed of gravitational waves were different from the speed of light?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the impossibility of gravitational waves traveling at a speed different from that of light, as dictated by the principles of general relativity. It asserts that both gravitational waves and light must travel at the same speed for all observers, a concept rooted in the laws of physics that govern electromagnetism and gravity. The conversation highlights that any deviation from this speed would lead to mathematical contradictions and an inconsistent theoretical framework. Current detection methods, such as those employed by the LIGO observatories, focus on colliding black holes, with future advancements expected to enhance our ability to triangulate gravitational wave sources.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity
  • Familiarity with the principles of electromagnetism
  • Knowledge of gravitational wave detection methods
  • Basic grasp of the speed of light and its significance in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the mathematical foundations of general relativity
  • Study the principles of gravitational wave detection using LIGO
  • Investigate the implications of electromagnetic wave behavior
  • Learn about the future developments in gravitational wave observatories
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, astrophysicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the implications of gravitational waves and general relativity.

parshyaa
Messages
307
Reaction score
19
What would happened if the speed of gravitational waves were not equal to the speed of light . Please explain it with example of sun and Earth or any other but in easy way. With reference to general relativity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
parshyaa said:
What would happened if the speed of gravitational waves were not equal to the speed of light . Please explain it with example of sun and Earth or any other but in easy way. With reference to general relativity.
It's not mathematically possible, which makes it impossible to sensibly answer the question as asked: it's like asking what would happen if we could factor a prime number.

Light is electromagnetic radiation obeying the laws of electricity and magnetism; gravitational waves obey the laws of gravity.

Both sets of laws have the property that they are the same for all observers regardless of their speed (we don't see the laws of E&M or gravity changing with the seasons even though the Earth is moving in a completely different direction in June and December). One consequence is that waves obeying these laws must travel at the same speed for all observers; this is the basis of Einstein's theory of special relativity.

It turns out that there can only be one "same for all observers" speed; if you assume that there is more than one you end up with mathematical contradictions and an inconsistent theory. So, since there's only one possible speed, they both have to travel at that speed, and it's the same for both of them.

It's actually a historical accident that we even call ##c## "the speed of light". We measured how fast light moves centuries before the discovery of electromagnetic and gravitational waves, so when we found that the one and only "same for all observers" speed was equal to the already known speed of light it was natural to keep calling that speed "the speed of light".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: parshyaa
Well, it would mean that general relativity is not correct. But so far, general relativity has passed many of our tests with flying colors, so I wouldn't bet on it.
 
It would be interesting to observe a stellar object in the path of the gravitational wave that would display a visual result of the wave's passing through it.Then could we calculate the wave's speed of transmission using the distance between origin and impacted object?
 
The only thing we can detect with gravitational waves right now are colliding black holes. With the two LIGO observatories, we can't get a good measurement of where the gravitational waves are coming from, but when additional observatories come online we can do triangulation to find where they are coming from. Then we can compare with visual observatories.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K