Is the speed of light constant, or could it vary with frequency?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The speed of light in a vacuum is constant across all reference frames, a principle supported by extensive experimental evidence related to Lorentz invariance. While some theories, such as loop quantum gravity, suggest that the speed of light may not be constant due to vacuum dispersion, these ideas do not undermine the foundations of relativity. Additionally, the concept of frequency-dependent speed of light has been explored, with experiments indicating minimal deviation at lower frequencies and potential variations at higher frequencies. Further research is necessary to clarify these findings and their implications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lorentz invariance
  • Familiarity with loop quantum gravity concepts
  • Knowledge of photon mass implications
  • Basic principles of special relativity
NEXT STEPS
  • Investigate the implications of loop quantum gravity on light speed
  • Study the concept of doubly-special relativity
  • Review Jackson's Electrodynamics for frequency-dependent light speed experiments
  • Explore current research on Lorentz violation in the gravity sector
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and researchers interested in the foundations of relativity and the nature of light.

h1a8
Messages
86
Reaction score
4
Is there any chance that the speed of light in a vacuum isn't constant in all reference frames, implying that Relativity theory is generally false? Do some Physicists believe that it is?

If no, why not or how can we be so sure?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any part of physics is subject to revision if new experimental evidence comes along that requires it.

The constancy of the speed of light has been tested a lot, along with the related concept of "Lorentz invariance." So far, experiments support them with high precision. See section three of the following FAQ:

http://www.edu-observatory.org/physics-faq/Relativity/SR/experiments.html
 
To be pedantic, the speed of light is constant in all reference frames by definition. Instead, it makes sense to ask whether the length of a meter is constant in all reference frames.
 
As jtbell correctly notes, the most direct way to interpret this question is to think of it as a question about the current state of the art in testing Lorentz invariance.

There are other possibilities.

Loop quantum gravity predicts that the vacuum is dispersive, so the speed of light isn't constant even in a single frame: http://arxiv.org/abs/0908.1832

The photon could turn out to have a nonvanishing rest mass:
R.S. Lakes, "Experimental limits on the photon mass and cosmic magnetic vector potential", Physical Review Letters , 1998, 80, 1826-1829, http://silver.neep.wisc.edu/~lakes/mu.html
If this is the case, then there are no implications for the foundations of relativity, but gauge theory would be in trouble.

There are other scenarios motivated by quantum gravity, e.g., doubly-special relativity: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doubly-special_relativity If doubly-special relativity is right, then there is no violation of Lorentz invariance, but there is a higher symmetry as well.

You can also search for Lorentz violation in the gravity sector rather than the photon sector: http://www.lightandmatter.com/html_books/genrel/ch02/ch02.html#Section2.4 (subsection 2.4.3)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Another possibility worth exploring is whether the speed of light is frequency dependent - varying with the frequency of the photon. In Jackson's Electrodynamics textbook he describes the experiments which have so far been done. At lower frequencies the experimental deviation is very, very small. But at very high frequencies the possible deviation is on the order of one part in a thousand. That doesn't necessarily mean there actually is a consistent deviation because the margin of error may be far greater based the measurement technique. So further study seems warranted.
 
PhilDSP said:
Another possibility worth exploring is whether the speed of light is frequency dependent - varying with the frequency of the photon. In Jackson's Electrodynamics textbook he describes the experiments which have so far been done. At lower frequencies the experimental deviation is very, very small. But at very high frequencies the possible deviation is on the order of one part in a thousand. That doesn't necessarily mean there actually is a consistent deviation because the margin of error may be far greater based the measurement technique. So further study seems warranted.

A more up to date reference: http://arxiv.org/abs/0908.1832
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
60
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 74 ·
3
Replies
74
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
6K