Speed of neutrinos - latest results?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DaveC426913
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Neutrinos Speed
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The speed of neutrinos has been a topic of debate since the OPERA experiment's controversial results in 2011, which suggested neutrinos might exceed the speed of light. However, subsequent analyses, including a 2021 report, reaffirm that neutrinos travel at speeds consistent with the speed of light, with no significant deviations observed. Current understanding indicates that neutrinos possess mass, which affects their maximum speed, but definitive measurements remain elusive. The latest findings emphasize the challenges in measuring neutrino speeds due to their weak interactions with matter.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity and its implications on particle physics.
  • Familiarity with neutrino properties and their role in astrophysics.
  • Knowledge of experimental methods in particle physics, particularly regarding neutrino detection.
  • Awareness of the OPERA experiment and its historical context in neutrino speed measurements.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the latest findings from the IceCube experiment regarding high-energy neutrinos.
  • Explore the implications of neutrino mass on their speed and interactions in particle physics.
  • Study the methodologies used in measuring neutrino speeds, including Cherenkov radiation detection.
  • Investigate recent literature on neutrino astrophysics, particularly concerning supernova observations.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, astrophysicists, and researchers interested in particle physics, particularly those focusing on neutrino research and the implications of their speed on fundamental physics theories.

  • #31
We have never seen a neutrino from a supernova. We have only seen antineutrinos.

Neutrinos have a short emission time - a time scale of tens of milliseconds. Antineutrinos have a time scale of tens of seconds.

So a nearby galactic supernova would be 1000x better than 1987a? Not exactly - while we know the start time ~1000x better, it would also be ~1000x closer,. so the time difference is ~1000x smaller. And we're right back where we were. Maybe we'll do two or four times better, but not a thousand.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Hornbein said:
Is the idea that the higher energy neutrinos will be faster. Then if we can detect the pulses and the model for timing of the pulse origin is correct we can then calculate the rest mass. I suppose the problem is that at highly relativistic speeds the difference in velocity is tiny. Well, it's not my problem. Let someone else earn their PhD doing this.
The idea is that neutrinos get spewed out in advance of the the explosion itself fully manifesting in a particular pattern, and you need to model the process properly to make meaningful comparisons of different signals arriving from a distant source. You also need to model properly different routes that the neutrino could have taken to get from the source to Earth where it is detected.
 
  • #33
Vanadium 50 said:
We have never seen a neutrino from a supernova. We have only seen antineutrinos.

True but pretty pedantic. Obviously, in this context, one is talking about both neutrino and antineutrino observations when one is talking about what neutrino telescopes on Earth are seeing.

Vanadium 50 said:
Neutrinos have a short emission time - a time scale of tens of milliseconds. Antineutrinos have a time scale of tens of seconds.

So a nearby galactic supernova would be 1000x better than 1987a? Not exactly - while we know the start time ~1000x better, it would also be ~1000x closer,. so the time difference is ~1000x smaller. And we're right back where we were. Maybe we'll do two or four times better, but not a thousand.
This tradeoff is indeed a big deal and creates a sweet spot that is not too near and not too far.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
8K
  • · Replies 130 ·
5
Replies
130
Views
15K