Speed of skiis (someone check my work, please)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the speed of a ski at the base of a 22-degree incline and the distance traveled on a level surface, considering a coefficient of friction of 0.090. The correct speed at the base of the incline is determined to be 21 m/s, while the distance traveled on the level surface is calculated to be 250 m, contradicting the book's answer of 2400 m. Participants utilized energy methods and kinematics to derive these results, emphasizing the importance of understanding work done by friction and the conservation of energy principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Law of Conservation of Energy
  • Familiarity with kinematic equations
  • Knowledge of work-energy principles
  • Basic understanding of friction and its calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of work done by friction in energy calculations
  • Learn how to apply kinematic equations to solve for distance and acceleration
  • Explore the relationship between potential energy and kinetic energy in physics
  • Investigate common misconceptions in physics problems involving friction and energy
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for physics exams, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of motion on inclined planes and the effects of friction.

jrd007
Messages
159
Reaction score
0
Law of Conservation of Energy
(2) A ski starts from rest and slides down a 22 degree incline 75 m long.
(a) If the coeffiecent of friction is .090, what is the ski's speed at the base of the incline?
(b) If the snow is level at the foot of the incline and has the same coeffiecent of friction, how far will the ski travel along the level? Use energy methods. correct answer: 2400 m
------------------
My thoughts were to use the equation Wnc = KE + PE

Seeing as there is no potential energy on the way down I now have Wnc = KE

Then I had to find the work acting on the skiis... so...

Work(weight) + Work(friction) = (1/2)mv^2

Weights force would be (sin22 x m x g)
frictions would be (.090 x N) = (.090 x cos22 mg)

I would say the m's cancel out. So then we substitute back into Work(weight) + Work(friction) = (1/2)v^2

((sin22 x g) x 75m x cos0) + ((.090 x cos22 x g) x 75m x cos180) = 1/2v^2

so I get...

275 + (-61) = .5V^2
214/.5 = v^2
sq root of 428 = v
v = 20.6 = 21.0 Answer in Book: 21 m/s

Part B

Would I use a similar equation but instead of the Wnc = KE it would be Worknc = PE
Work nc = mgh ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
can someone please help me? my exam is friday... :(
 
Can't you just plug in the 21 m/s for an initial velocity somewhere?
 
Maybe I could use kinematics?

v2 = vo2 +2a(x-xo) ?

That doesn't work...

I was thinking since it says at the bottom of the incline there would be no potential engery so I could use

PE = KE but that does not work either.

I cannot figure out an equation in which I am trying to find distance
 
also tried first finding a so I could use kinematics.

a = V^2/75
21^2/75 = 5.88

Then I used:

v2 = vo2 +2a(x-xo)
0 = 21^2 +2(5.88)(x-75m)
-441 = 11.76(x-75)
-36 = x-75
39... and the correct answer is 2400, what haven't I tried?
 
Several ways to attack part B:

Start by finding the friction force.

Energy methods: Work done by friction = change in Energy

Kinematics: Use the force to find the acceleration.
 
Finding Friction force would be, as previous stated, (but I do not have a mass, so how can I find the friction force?

How do I find the friction force though?

I do not have a mass...

Friction force = .090 x ?
 
would it be friction force = .090 x 9.8 m/s = .882 ?

My problem is writing the questions out...

(.882 N)(75 m) cos0 = 61.65 J

61.65 J = change in energy? What does that mean?

Sorry, Doc Al. I am just getting lost here.
 
jrd007 said:
Finding Friction force would be, as previous stated, (but I do not have a mass, so how can I find the friction force?
Just find it in terms of the unknown mass. You'll find that you don't need to know the mass to solve the problem. (Sorry if I wasn't clear before.)
How do I find the friction force though?

I do not have a mass...

Friction force = .090 x ?
Friction will equal \mu N. What's N?
 
  • #10
N = W = mg.

f = \mu mg

So would it just be \mu g
 
  • #11
jrd007 said:
N = W = mg.
f = \mu mg
Exactly right.
So would it just be \mu g
Not sure why you dropped the m.

In any case, now you are ready to solve the problem using energy methods or using kinematics. Do it both ways!

Energy method: You have the friction force and the distance, so what's the work done by friction? (Don't forget that it's negative.) And what's the change in KE? ({KE}_f - {KE}_i)

Kinematics: You have the friction force, so what's the acceleration?
 
  • #12
Work by f = change

(\mu mg)(d)cos(180) = 1/2mv^2? -1/2mv^2

(\mu mg)(d)cos(180) = -220 - 220 (440)

That still does not work... am I solving for the D?
 
Last edited:
  • #13
With Kinematics: F = ma
(.09 m g) = m (a) ---- m's cancel out
.09 x 9.8 = a
.882 m/s

v2 = vo2 +2a(x-xo)
21^2 = 0 +2(.882) (x-xo)
441/1.764 = (x -xo)
250...

not getting the answer either way. :(
 
  • #14
jrd007 said:
(\mu mg)(d)cos(180) = 1/2mv^2? -1/2mv^2
This is correct. What's the final KE? You found (in part a) the initial speed the skier has entering the level section. I'd rewrite it like this:
- \mu m g D = \frac{1}{2}m v_f^2 - \frac{1}{2}m v_i^2
 
  • #15
jrd007 said:
With Kinematics: F = ma
(.09 m g) = m (a) ---- m's cancel out
.09 x 9.8 = a
.882 m/s

v2 = vo2 +2a(x-xo)
21^2 = 0 +2(.882) (x-xo)
441/1.764 = (x -xo)
250...
not getting the answer either way. :(
This is correct. (Guess what? The book's answer is wrong!) Now do it using energy methods and verify that you get the same answer: D = 250 m.

(I didn't check the answer to part a; I assume that one's correct.)
 
  • #16
The following code was used to generate this LaTeX image:



- \mu m g D = \frac{1}{2}m v_f^2 - \frac{1}{2}m v_i^2


So I substitute with numbers

-.09 x 9.8 x D = (1/2)(0 cause it will be when skii stops) - (1/2)(21^2)


-.882 x D = -220.5
D = 250 m

And you're saying the book is wrong?
 
  • #17
jrd007 said:
And you're saying the book is wrong?
That's what I'm saying.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K