Sphere rolling down incline then up incline?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a sphere of mass M and radius R rolling down an incline and then moving up another incline without friction. The sphere's moment of inertia is given as I = cMR^2, and the task is to determine the height h that the sphere reaches after rolling down from a height H.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss conservation of energy principles, attempting to relate potential and kinetic energy for both the downward and upward motion of the sphere. There are questions about the calculations for v^2 and the treatment of rotational kinetic energy during the transition between the two inclines.

Discussion Status

Some participants have shared their calculations and results for v^2, while others have pointed out potential algebraic errors. There is a recognition that the method used may be sound, but individual results vary. A few participants have indicated they arrived at solutions in terms of H and c, although they express uncertainty about their correctness.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraint that the final answer must only include H and c, and there is an acknowledgment of the possibility of mistakes in their calculations.

Watney
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A sphere of mass M and radius R is not necessarily solid or hollow. It has moment of inertia I = cMR^2 . The sphere starts from rest and rolls without slipping down a ramp from height H. It then moves back up the other side with height h, but now with no friction at all between the sphere and the ramp.
What height h does the sphere reach?
(Answer should only include H and c.)

Homework Equations


I = cMR^2
KE = 1/2Iω^2
PEg = mgH

The Attempt at a Solution


So I tried setting up a conservation of energy for both sides of the ramp. For the first half I got
mgH = 1/2mv^2 + 1/2Iω^2. I then solved for v^2.
For the second half of the ramp (one without friction), I got
1/2mv^2 + 1/2Iω^2 = mgh + 1/2Iω^2.
I solved for h then plugged in v^2 from the first equation and got g^2H/c but my answer can't have g so I know this is wrong. Any pointers? I've never done a problem like this so I'm pretty sure I'm way off.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In this first part, what did you get when you solved for v2?
 
TomHart said:
In this first part, what did you get when you solved for v2?
]

I got (gH)/c but I'm not entirely sure if it's correct.
 
Yeah, I got something different for v2.

In your equation for the second half of the ramp, you have 1/2Iω2 on both sides of the equation. I assume those are the same and they cancel out, true? At least that's how I see the problem. When the sphere starts up the other side of the ramp, none of the rotational kinetic energy converts back to potential energy. So it looks like your method is good. I think you are just having algebra issues. I was able to come up with a solution in terms of only H and c.

Edit: I feel obligated to put in my standard disclaimer. I am prone to making mistakes. And even though I found a solution in terms of only H and c, it could still be incorrect. :)
 
TomHart said:
Yeah, I got something different for v2.

In your equation for the second half of the ramp, you have 1/2Iω2 on both sides of the equation. I assume those are the same and they cancel out, true? At least that's how I see the problem. When the sphere starts up the other side of the ramp, none of the rotational kinetic energy converts back to potential energy. So it looks like your method is good. I think you are just having algebra issues. I was able to come up with a solution in terms of only H and c.

Edit: I feel obligated to put in my standard disclaimer. I am prone to making mistakes. And even though I found a solution in terms of only H and c, it could still be incorrect. :)

Haha no worries! So I tried it again and got 2gH/c+1. Is this correct?
 
Plugged it in and got the right answer! Thanks Tom!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
871
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
978
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
3K