Spherical Balloon - Related Rates Problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a related rates problem involving a spherical balloon, where the radius increases at a rate of 1 cm/min. The volume of the balloon is calculated using the formula V = (4/3)π(r^3) and the rate of change of volume is given by dV/dt = 4π(r^2)(dr/dt). For a diameter of 2000 cm, the calculated volume increase is 4,000,000π cm³/min, but the expected answer is 40,000π cm³/min, indicating a likely error in the problem statement regarding the diameter.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of related rates in calculus
  • Familiarity with the volume formula for spheres: V = (4/3)π(r^3)
  • Knowledge of differentiation techniques
  • Ability to interpret and manipulate mathematical equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the concept of related rates in calculus
  • Practice problems involving volume and surface area of spheres
  • Learn about error checking in mathematical problem statements
  • Explore applications of calculus in real-world scenarios involving rates of change
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on related rates problems, as well as educators looking for examples to illustrate these concepts.

rum2563
Messages
89
Reaction score
1
[SOLVED] Spherical Balloon - Related Rates Problem

Homework Statement


A spherical balloon is inflated so that its radius increases at a rate of 1 cm/min. How fast is the volume increasing when:

a) the diameter is 2000 cm
b) the surface area is 324 pi cm^2 ---> I have solved this already


Homework Equations


V = (4/3)pi(r^3)
dV/dt = 4pi(r^2)(dr/dt)


The Attempt at a Solution



For part (a) the diameter is 2000 cm.
So I make it 1000 cm for Radius

Now, I put it in the equation:

dV/dt = 4pi(r^2)(dr/dt)

where dr/dt = 1cm/min

dV/dt = 4pi(1000^2)(1 cm/min)
= 4 000 000 pi cm^3 / min

But, the answer in the book is 40 000 pi cm^3 / min.

Please help me out. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi rum2563! :smile:

Your answer looks right to me.

I think the book must have meant 200cm, not 2000. :frown:
 
thanks very much. I thought so too. 2000 seems too much exaggerated. I am going to check with my teacher just to make sure. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K