Spherical co-ordinates conversion

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Fermat1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spherical
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the conversion of Cartesian coordinates to spherical coordinates, specifically focusing on determining the ranges of the variables involved in the context of specific geometric regions defined by equations. The participants explore the implications of these conversions for integration and flux calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the region above the surface defined by $z=-\sqrt{2-x^2-y^2}$ and below $z=-\sqrt{x^2+y^2}$ can be described using spherical coordinates with the transformation $x=r\sin\phi\cos\theta$, $y=r\sin\phi\sin\theta$, $z=r\cos\phi$.
  • There is a suggestion that the range for $r$ is $0 \leq r \leq \sqrt{2}$, but the ranges for $\phi$ and $\theta$ are debated.
  • Some participants indicate that $\theta$ can take the full range $0 \leq \theta < 2\pi$, while the range for $\phi$ is discussed as starting from the cone at $\frac{3\pi}{4}$ to $\pi$, or alternatively from $\frac{\pi}{2}$ to $\frac{3\pi}{4}$, depending on the interpretation of the region.
  • There is a question about how to determine the upper limit for $\phi$, with some suggesting that there may be no upper restriction apart from $\pi$.
  • Another participant raises a question regarding the calculation of outward flux through a sphere, noting a restriction of the angles to $[0,\frac{\pi}{2}]$ and asking for clarification on this limitation.
  • It is noted that any restrictions on the angles must be explicitly stated in the problem statement.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the ranges of $\phi$ and $\theta$, with no consensus reached on the upper limit for $\phi$. The discussion regarding the flux calculation also highlights a lack of agreement on the necessity of angle restrictions.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the need for visualizing the surfaces involved to better understand the ranges of the angles. The discussion also reflects on the importance of explicit problem statements in determining the limits of integration.

Fermat1
Messages
180
Reaction score
0
Consider the region above the $z=-\sqrt{2-x^2-y^2}$ and below $z=-\sqrt{x^2+y^2}$.

Let $x=r\sin\phi\cos\theta$, $y=r\sin\phi\sin\theta$, $z=r\cos\phi$

I want the range of the variables. I get $0\leq r\leq\sqrt{2}$.

How do I work out the range of $\phi$ and $\theta$ ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fermat said:
Consider the region above the $z=-\sqrt{2-x^2-y^2}$ and below $z=-\sqrt{x^2+y^2}$.

Let $x=r\sin\phi\cos\theta$, $y=r\sin\phi\sin\theta$, $z=r\cos\phi$

I want the range of the variables. I get $0\leq r\leq\sqrt{2}$.

How do I work out the range of $\phi$ and $\theta$ ?

Simplest is by drawing those surfaces.
The first is a demi-sphere below the $z=0$ plane.
The second is a cone, also below the $z=0$ plane.

In polar coordinates you will have the full range for the longutide $0 \le \theta < 2\pi$.

Edited:
And the colatitude begins at the cone.
That is, $\frac{3\pi}{4} \le \phi \le \pi$.
 
I like Serena said:
Simplest is by drawing those surfaces.
The first is a demi-sphere below the $z=0$ plane.
The second is a cone, also below the $z=0$ plane.

In polar coordinates you will have the full range for the longutide $0 \le \theta < 2\pi$.
And the colatitude begins at the $z=0$ plane and ends at the cone.
That is, $\frac \pi 2 \le \phi \le \frac{3\pi}{4}$.

Hi can you explain how you found those angles-how do they relate to the equations for z?Thanks
 
Fermat said:
Hi can you explain how you found those angles-how do they relate to the equations for z?Thanks

Let's take a look at the cone $z=-\sqrt{x^2+y^2}$.

Substituting the definitions of the polar coordinates, we get:
$$r\cos\phi = -\sqrt{(r\sin\phi\cos\theta)^2 + (r\sin\phi\sin\theta)^2} = -r\sin\phi$$
Since $\theta$ is not present in this equation, we need its full range.
Solving it for $\phi$ in the domain $[0,\pi]$ gives $\phi=\frac{3\pi}{4}$.

So to integrate above the cone, we need $0 \le \theta < 2\pi$ and $\phi \le \frac{3\pi}{4}$.
 
I like Serena said:
Let's take a look at the cone $z=-\sqrt{x^2+y^2}$.

Substituting the definitions of the polar coordinates, we get:
$$r\cos\phi = -\sqrt{(r\sin\phi\cos\theta)^2 + (r\sin\phi\sin\theta)^2} = -r\sin\phi$$
Since $\theta$ is not present in this equation, we need its full range.
Solving it for $\phi$ in the domain $[0,\pi]$ gives $\phi=\frac{3\pi}{4}$.

So to integrate above the cone, we need $0 \le \theta < 2\pi$ and $\phi \le \frac{3\pi}{4}$.

thanks, do you mean integrate below the cone?
 
Fermat said:
thanks, do you mean integrate below the cone?

Ah. To integrate below the cone it should be $\phi \ge \frac{3\pi}{4}$.
 
I like Serena said:
Ah. To integrate below the cone it should be $\phi \ge \frac{3\pi}{4}$.

How do you get the upper limit? When I use the other equation I 'lose' ${\phi}$. Does that signify there is no upper restriction (apart from ${\pi}$)?
 
Fermat said:
How do you get the upper limit? When I use the other equation I 'lose' ${\phi}$. Does that signify there is no upper restriction (apart from ${\pi}$)?

Yes.
 
I like Serena said:
Yes.

How about this. Calculate the outward flux through the surface $x^2+y^2+z^2=1$ of a fluid with velocity field $F$.

When I convert to spherical, the range of both anges should be [0,${\pi}$/2] Why is there this restriction?

Thanks
 
  • #10
Fermat said:
How about this. Calculate the outward flux through the surface $x^2+y^2+z^2=1$ of a fluid with velocity field $F$.

When I convert to spherical, the range of both anges should be [0,${\pi}$/2] Why is there this restriction?

Thanks

There is no implicit reason for such a restriction.
The text must have explicitly stated any restrictions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K