What is the formula for determining small angles in spherical diopters?

  • Thread starter Thread starter duchuy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Spherical
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the formula for small angles in spherical diopters, specifically how to derive alpha as SP/AS. Participants express confusion about the definitions of angles and the relationships between SP, AS, and the angles alpha and omega. There is a consensus that for small angles, the approximation tan(alpha) ≈ alpha can be applied, simplifying calculations. Clarification is sought on whether SP refers to the length of the straight line or curvature, with suggestions that this may involve approximations. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for precise definitions and understanding of trigonometric relationships in this context.
duchuy
Messages
79
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
I can't seem to understand the relation
Relevant Equations
angle = length / length
Hi,
I don't understand how the professor managed to determine the values of alpha, alpha' and omega. What is the formula tha´t is applied to determine alpha = SP / AS and so on... knowing that alpha is a really small angle. Cheers
Capture.PNG
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to ask specific questions one at a time as you try to work through this. You could start by saying in specific detail what you wish to know when we are finished here.
The typical way to define an angle (in radians) is ?
 
hutchphd said:
You need to ask specific questions one at a time as you try to work through this. You could start by saying in specific detail what you wish to know when we are finished here.
Thanks for your reply, would you then mind explaining me how the professor managed to determine that alpha = SP / AS? I did try to use trigonometric formulas for this but the results were nowhere near SP / AS. Thanks a lot.
 
hutchphd said:
I don't really understand... PAC which is the alpha angle doesn't have A as the center of the circle and SP is the length of the the straight line SP not the curvature SP. Or in this case is SP referring to the length of the curvature? That would make sense for the omega angle but still not for alpha no?
Thanks
 
I see. Does he specify pt A in some way or is it arbitrary? This may be an approximation.
 
So when you say that this may be an approximation, are you saying that since alpha is a really small angle, therefore you could write tan alpha = alpha then use the tan = o/a to write these expressions right? This makes a lot of sense thanks a lot!
 

Similar threads

Replies
46
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K