Spin expectation values in x and y direction

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around quantum mechanics, specifically the calculation of spin expectation values in the x and y directions using the generalized Ehrenfest theorem. The original poster is examining the implications of an initial state vector in the context of a magnetic field aligned in the z-direction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the interpretation of the initial state vector and its relation to the z-direction. There are inquiries about the application of the generalized Ehrenfest theorem to derive the rates of change of spin expectation values. Some participants express confusion about the implications of their calculations and seek clarification on the relationship between the commutator and expectation values.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with participants sharing their calculations and interpretations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the application of Ehrenfest's theorem, and there is an ongoing exploration of how to express the rate of change of the spin expectation values in terms of the relevant parameters. There is no explicit consensus, but productive lines of reasoning are being examined.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that the initial state vector is correctly interpreted in the context of the magnetic field's direction. There is also a mention of specific values and relationships involving the constants and operators relevant to the problem.

bobred
Messages
170
Reaction score
0
I have found what I think is the correct answer I just want to check an assumption. The magnetic field points in the +ve z-direction. We are given the initial state vector

[itex]\left| A \right\rangle_{initial}=\frac{1}{5}\left[ \begin{array}{c}3\\4\end{array} \right][/itex]

Am I right in thinking that this is in the z-direction?
So that

[itex]\left| A \right\rangle_{initial}= a_1 \left| \uparrow_z \right\rangle + a_2 \left| \downarrow_z \right\rangle = \frac{3}{5}\left[ \begin{array}{c}1\\0\end{array} \right] + \frac{4}{5}\left[ \begin{array}{c}0\\1\end{array} \right][/itex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi bobred! :wink:
bobred said:
Am I right in thinking that this is in the z-direction?

if you mean, do the notations (1 0) and (0 1) mean the +ve and -ve z directions, then yes :smile:

(that is the general convention, and you can assume it unless stated otherwise)
 
Hi
Yes that's what I meant. We are then asked to find the expectation values at a later time which I have.

We are then asked using the generalized Ehrenfest theorem to find the rate of change of [itex]\left\langle S_x \right\rangle[/itex] and [itex]\left\langle S_y \right\rangle[/itex] in terms of [itex]\left\langle S_x \right\rangle[/itex] and [itex]\left\langle S_y \right\rangle[/itex] and ω. Using the generalized Ehrenfest theorem I find them in terms of [itex]\hat{S_x}[/itex] and [itex]\hat{S_y}[/itex] and ω. Any ideas?
 
bobred said:
We are then asked using the generalized Ehrenfest theorem to find the rate of change of [itex]\left\langle S_x \right\rangle[/itex] and [itex]\left\langle S_y \right\rangle[/itex] in terms of [itex]\left\langle S_x \right\rangle[/itex] and [itex]\left\langle S_y \right\rangle[/itex] and ω. Using the generalized Ehrenfest theorem I find them in terms of [itex]\hat{S_x}[/itex] and [itex]\hat{S_y}[/itex] and ω. Any ideas?

How far have you gotten? Are you able to get an expression for [Sx, H] in terms of Sx and/or Sy?
 
Last edited:
Hi, I get (we are told [itex]\omega = -\gamma_s B[/itex])

[itex]\left[ \hat{S_x},\hat{H} \right]=-\frac{\gamma_s B \hbar^2}{2}\left[ \begin{array}{cc}0&-1\\1& 0 \end{array} \right]=\frac{\omega \hbar^2}{2}\left[ \begin{array}{cc}0&-1\\1& 0 \end{array} \right][/itex]

and

[itex]\displaystyle\dfrac{d\left\langle S_x \right\rangle}{dt}=-\frac{\omega \hbar}{2}\left[ \begin{array}{cc}0&-i\\i& 0 \end{array} \right]=-\omega \hat{S_y}[/itex]
 
bobred said:
Hi, I get (we are told [itex]\omega = -\gamma_s B[/itex])

[itex]\left[ \hat{S_x},\hat{H} \right]=-\frac{\gamma_s B \hbar^2}{2}\left[ \begin{array}{cc}0&-1\\1& 0 \end{array} \right]=\frac{\omega \hbar^2}{2}\left[ \begin{array}{cc}0&-1\\1& 0 \end{array} \right][/itex]

and

[itex]\displaystyle\dfrac{d\left\langle S_x \right\rangle}{dt}=-\frac{\omega \hbar}{2}\left[ \begin{array}{cc}0&-i\\i& 0 \end{array} \right]=-\omega \hat{S_y}[/itex]

Looks pretty good. But note that Ehrenfest's theorem states

[itex]\displaystyle\dfrac{d\left\langle S_x \right\rangle}{dt}= \frac{1}{i\hbar}\langle\left[ \hat{S_x},\hat{H} \right]\rangle[/itex]

The right hand side contains an expectation value of ##\left[ \hat{S_x},\hat{H} \right]##.
 
From the commutator I get the expectation value of the spin y operator... can't seem to see where to go from there.
 
bobred said:
From the commutator I get the expectation value of the spin y operator... can't seem to see where to go from there.

Doesn't that provide the answer to the question? That is, you now have the rate of change of ##\langle S_x \rangle## expressed in terms of ##\omega## and ##\langle S_y \rangle##. Or have I misunderstood what you are trying to find?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Hi, my fault I had confused myself. Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K