What Are Spin Functions and How Do They Work?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Repetit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions Spin
Click For Summary
Spin functions, specifically denoted as alpha (spin up) and beta (spin down), represent the quantum states of electrons with spin 1/2 in a two-dimensional spin vector space. These functions are analogous to spatial wave functions, which exist in an infinite-dimensional vector space. The total Hilbert space of a quantum system combines both spatial and spin components, forming a complete wavefunction. The introduction of spin functions arose from experimental observations like atomic spectra and the Zeeman effect, which indicated an additional quantum number related to the electron's internal angular momentum. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the fundamentals of quantum mechanics.
Repetit
Messages
128
Reaction score
2
Hey!

Can someone explain to me what the spin functions are? I understand that a spin up is described by a function which is often called \alpha and spin down is described by a similar function called \beta. But what are these functions? What do they look like and what parameters do they take? Are they orthonormal like spatial wave functions?

If you have a good source for information on this I'd be grateful. I've tried searching Google but that didn't really give me any good information.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The spatial wave functions can be considered vectors (points) in an infinite dimensional vector space (the functional space of square integrable functions).

Analogously, the spin wave functions are vectors in the spin vector space which is finite dimensional. For electrons of spin 1/2, the spin space is two dimensional and can be spanned by two base vectors which you called alpha and beta.

The total Hilbert space of the system is the direct sum of the spatial space and the spin space i. e. the full wavefunction has space part and spin part.

The spin part of the wave function looks very contrived to beginners and most textbook do not put it in proper hystorical perspective to show that mathematical machinery was created to explain the experiment. The atomic spectra, the Zeeman effect, the Pauli exclusion principle all suggested that electrons in atoms have another quantum number. Later it was realized that number corresponded to a new degree of freedom unrelated to spatial degrees but associated with the internal angular momentum state of the electron. That is how the spin part of the wave function was introduced into the picture.
 
Last edited:
smallphi said:
The spatial wave functions can be considered vectors (points) in an infinite dimensional vector space (the functional space of square integrable functions).

Analogously, the spin wave functions are vectors in the spin vector space which is finite dimensional. For electrons of spin 1/2, the spin space is two dimensional and can be spanned by two base vectors which you called alpha and beta.

The total Hilbert space of the system is the direct sum of the spatial space and the spin space i. e. the full wavefunction has space part and spin part.

The spin part of the wave function looks very contrived to beginners and most textbook do not put it in proper hystorical perspective to show that mathematical machinery was created to explain the experiment. The atomic spectra, the Zeeman effect, the Pauli exclusion principle all suggested that electrons in atoms have another quantum number. Later it was realized that number corresponded to a new degree of freedom unrelated to spatial degrees but associated with the internal angular momentum state of the electron. That is how the spin part of the wave function was introduced into the picture.

This is an excellent response, thank you.
 
Thanks alot, that cleared things up for me!
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
504
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K