Spin hamiltionian with respect to certain basis

  • Thread starter Thread starter Heimisson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basis Spin
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the Hamiltonian for a spin-1/2 particle in a magnetic field represented by B = B_0(1,1,0). The Hamiltonian is expressed as H = -γB·S, resulting in the matrix H = (B_0 ħ/2) * [[0, 1-i], [1+i, 0]]. The participant seeks clarification on the relationship between the Hamiltonian and the spin operator S_z, particularly in the context of linear algebra and basis transformations. The eigenvectors of S_z, represented by the Pauli matrices, play a crucial role in defining the spin states.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically spin-1/2 systems
  • Familiarity with Hamiltonians and their physical significance
  • Knowledge of linear algebra, particularly matrix operations
  • Proficiency in the Pauli matrices and their applications in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Hamiltonian for spin systems in magnetic fields
  • Learn about the properties and applications of Pauli matrices in quantum mechanics
  • Explore basis transformations in quantum mechanics, particularly for spin states
  • Investigate the implications of magnetic fields on spin dynamics and precession
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those studying spin systems, magnetic interactions, and linear algebra applications in physics.

Heimisson
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A particle with spin 1/2 and magnetic moment is in a magnetic field B=B_0(1,1,0). At time t=0 the particle has the spin 1/2 \hbar in the z direction.

i) Write the hamiltonian with respect to the basis that is defined by the eigenvectors of \widehat{S}_z


Homework Equations


\widehat{S}_z = \hbar /2<br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{ c c }<br /> 1 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; -1<br /> \end{array} \right)


The Attempt at a Solution



So finding the hamiltonian is trivial:
H=-\gamma \textbf{B} \cdot \textbf{S} =<br /> = B_0 \hbar /2<br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{ c c }<br /> 0 &amp; 1-i \\<br /> 1+i &amp; 0<br /> \end{array} \right)
if my calculations are right. But what I don't really don't understand is what I wrote in the bold font. I thought I had to find the matrix A so:

if:
B=<br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{ c c }<br /> 0 &amp; 1-i \\<br /> 1+i &amp; 0<br /> \end{array} \right)

A \widehat{S}_z = B \Rightarrow A = B \widehat{S}_z^{-1}

but this is really just a shot in the dark I'm not really sure why I should do this.
It would be great if someone could shed some light on this I'm sort of rusty in linear algebra of finite vectors.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
With respect to the basis defined by the eigenvectors of S_z is just the usual basis of spin up = (1,0) and spin down = (0,1), for which the spin matrices are the Pauli matrices, i.e.
S_z = (1,0)(0,-1). In general you define S_z (and analogue S_x and S_y) by S_z |spin up> = |spin up> and S_z |spin down> = - |spin down>, so your explicit matrix expression for S_z changes if you use a basis of, say, 1/sqrt(2)(up+down) = (1,0) and 1/sqrt(2)(up-down) = (0,1).
(as an exercise, you may calculate S_z in that basis)
 

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K