Spin Magnetic Moment: Does an Electron Really Spin?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of electron spin and its implications for understanding intrinsic magnetic moments. It clarifies that while the term "spin" suggests rotation, it does not imply that electrons physically rotate around an axis. Instead, electron spin is a quantum mechanical property derived from the Dirac equation, observable in various experiments involving electrons, neutrons, and protons. The conversation emphasizes that the notion of spin serves as a useful model for comprehension, despite its limitations in accurately describing the behavior of fundamental particles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with the Dirac equation
  • Basic knowledge of particle physics, including quarks and angular momentum
  • Concept of intrinsic magnetic moments in particles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Dirac equation and its implications for particle physics
  • Explore the concept of intrinsic magnetic moments in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the behavior of quarks and their contribution to the spin of protons and neutrons
  • Learn about experimental methods for observing electron spin and related phenomena
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, chemistry students, and anyone interested in the fundamental properties of particles and quantum mechanics.

Prashasti
Messages
63
Reaction score
2
Does an electron really spin about its own axis? If not, what does spin magnetic moment imply? My physics teacher said "Besides the orbital moment, an electron has an intrinsic magnetic moment, it is called the spin magnetic moment, But I hasten to add that it is not as though the electron is spinning."

But, in my chemistry textbook, there's an illustration of an electron apparently "spinning" about its own axis. Moreover, the direction of spinning has also been shown.
magnetic-moment-of-electrons.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a historical accident that we use the word "spin" to describe the quantum mechanical property that leads to an electron having a magnetic moment. What's going on actually has nothing to do with rotation about an axis; it's not clear that an electron even has an axis to rotate around.

However, there are many situations where an electron behaves enough like a little rotating ball that we can use that as a model. It's not quite right, but it avoids some very hairy quantum mechanical complications, and it's no more "wrong" than pretending that the Earth is a perfect sphere (it's actually a bit misshapen) when you're thinking about latitude and longitude.

That's what your chemistry textbook is doing.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Prashasti
So, it is an assumption, right?
Thanks.
 
The spin of the electron is a relativistic effect that drops out of the Dirac equation. It is a very strange quantum mechanical beast that has nothing to do with the electron rotating like a prima ballerina. For example if you rotate the spin by 360 degrees you turn it upside down.

This picture is not an assumption, it is more like a crutch that allows people to come to grips with spin and relate it to something they know from the macroscopic world.

Spin has been observed in countless experiments. Electrons, neutrons and protons all have spin. There are thousands of experimental results that cannot be explained without taking spin into account.
 
If the electron was actually spinning on its axis, how would we ever know? For a composite object, we look at parts of the object while they revolve around the center of the object. For an object with no parts, what does it mean to spin? The question is not, does an electron spin, but, what exactly does it mean to spin?

If I define spin from basic experience, it is that it continuously evolves into rotated copies of its former self. For an object with perfect rotational symmetry, this condition is trivially satisfied. So I think it's fine to say it is really spinning, as long as you define your terms.
 
Neutrons and protons have parts, so something more complicated is happening for them. I think the neutron spin must be equal to the total of the spin of the constituent quarks and the orbital angular momentum of the quarks. I think the orbital angular momentum of the quarks is 0 in the ground state, but someone with more particle physics expertise should chime in.
 
Quarks have spin 1/2, just like the electron. So the effective spin of the proton and the neutron (both also 1/2) are not simply the sum of the 3 quarks' spins
 
Of course when adding angular momenta, they needn't point in the same direction. Is there a 3/2 spin excited state for a proton?

Edit: a Delta+ particle is an excited proton, with spins aligned, I think. Is that right?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K