B Spinning Black Hole Drags Space-Time: What Causes Friction?

happyhacker
Messages
49
Reaction score
7
TL;DR Summary
Spinning Black Hole and it's connection with Space-time.
If a Black Hole is spinning (perhaps they all do) I have heard it distorts the 'fabric' of Space-time in the vicinity. What is the 'friction' component which allows the distortion?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's worth noting that we have actually looked for this frame dragging effect in the vicinity of the Earth with the Gravity Probe B satellite, and it's been detected as predicted (to available precision, anyway).

It isn't a frictional effect, though - spacetime isn't a fabric and doesn't have material properties like a coefficient of friction. Unfortunately, I'm not sure that there is an answer to your question. All that we know about spacetime is that it curves in the presence of matter and energy in a way described by the Einstein Field Equations. In the presence of spinning masses, the equations say that the curvature of spacetime is such that free-falling objects start to orbit in the direction of spin. Fundamentally, that means that we know what happens but we don't really have a deeper answer about mechanisms.

If we ever work out a quantum theory of gravity, then we may be able to provide some mechanism for the curvature effects that we predict and see. However, such a theory would have its own "just because" aspects - all physical theories do.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Likes FactChecker
I would like to speculate as an amateur, if that is allowed in this forum, about something that might make frame-dragging more intuitive.
Suppose we have the extreme case of a very massive, spinning black hole. Near the hole, the mathematics is dominated by the hole and even the rest of the entire universe becomes secondary. So the mathematics would start to look in the limit as though the black hole is stationary and the local space-time would correspond to that. Farther from the black hole, the mathematics returns to normal with the universe being stationary and the black hole spinning. The overall effect would be frame-dragging near the black hole.
I would welcome an expert opinion on the validity of this, admittedly crude, thought.
 
FactChecker said:
Suppose we have the extreme case of a very massive, spinning black hole. Near the hole, the mathematics is dominated by the hole and even the rest of the entire universe becomes secondary. So the mathematics would start to look in the limit as though the black hole is stationary and the local space-time would correspond to that. Farther from the black hole, the mathematics returns to normal with the universe being stationary and the black hole spinning. The overall effect would be frame-dragging near the black hole.
I would welcome an expert opinion on the validity of this, admittedly crude, thought.
I'm not sure how well this will actually translate into the actual math.

It is true that, the closer you get to a spinning hole, the more the range of possible angular velocities (relative to infinity) you can have is constrained. The static limit, where the ergosphere starts, is where the constraint on possible angular velocities starts to exclude zero angular velocity--i.e., it's no longer possible, inside that limit, to not have some positive angular velocity; the smallest angular velocity you can have becomes greater than zero. But there is also a constraint on the largest angular velocity you can have, and the range between the two constraints gets tighter and tighter, until in the limit, as you approach the hole's horizon, the constraint tightens to a single possible angular velocity, the angular velocity of the hole itself.

I'm not sure that "the mathematics is dominated by the hole" is a good way to describe the above, though. The possible kinematics (i.e., possible orbital parameters) are increasingly dominated by the "kinematics of the hole" in the sense described above. However, this is not the same thing as frame dragging--although it has the same ultimate source, the spin of the hole. Frame dragging--the thing Gravity Probe B was testing for, Lense-Thirring precession--is an effect involving the direction in which spatial vectors fixed to a rigid body point as it orbits; it is not an effect involving the parameters of the orbit itself (such as the possible angular velocities).
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
@PeterDonis , Thanks. I appreciate your effort to explain it to a casual amateur. It is a tough subject. As long as my intuition is not completely absurd, I will probably just have to settle for it and not try to take it too literally. :-)
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
7K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
44
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Back
Top