haushofer said:
Maybe "A menu of supergravities" of Van Proeyen can help you. I found it quite understandable.
Excuse me,
I searched for this book in libraries nearby and on google but I couldn't find it?
Was this book published in english?
---
In the following, I briefly present the content and one of my question by which I stuck.
In the appendix B of Polchinski's string book.
One starts from the Clifford algebra in SO(d-1,1)
[tex]\{ \gamma^{\mu} , \gamma^\nu \} = 2\eta^{\mu\nu}[/tex]
In the even dimension, [tex]d = 2k+2[/tex], one can group the [tex]\gamma^\mu[/tex] into [tex]k+1[/tex] sets of anticommuting creation and annihilation operators,
[tex]
\gamma^{0\pm} = \frac{1}{2} (\pm\gamma^0 + \gamma^1)<br />
\quad\quad \gamma^{a\pm} = \frac{1}{2}(\gamma^{2a} \pm i \gamma^{2a+1})[/tex]
where [tex]a=1,2,\cdots, k[/tex].
One then found that,
[tex]
\{ \gamma^{a+}, \gamma^{b-} \} = \delta^{ab}\quad\quad<br />
\{ \gamma^{a+} , \gamma^{b+} \} = \{ \gamma^{a-} , \gamma^{b-} \} = 0[/tex]
That is, one finds that the gamma matrices can be grouped into the creation and annihilation operators of [tex]k[/tex] species of fermions. In particular, from
[tex](\gamma^{a-})^2 = 0[/tex]
one sees there exist a vacuum [tex]|\xi\rangle[/tex] annihilated by all [tex]\gamma^{a-}[/tex].
Thus, by this observation, one constructed the representation of Clifford algebra in the following space,
[tex]
(\gamma^{k+})^{s_k+1/2}\cdots(\gamma^{0+})^{s_0+1/2} |xi\rangle[/tex]
, i.e. a space of the tensor product of [tex]k[/tex] species fermions; so, the dimension of this representation is [tex]2^{k+1}[/tex].
In [tex]d = 2[/tex], one can easily work out the matrix form of the gamma matrices,
[tex]\gamma^0 = \left(\begin{array}{cc}0 &1\\ -1 &0\end{array}\right) = i\sigma^2[/tex]
[tex]\gamma^1 = \left(\begin{array}{cc}0 &1\\ 1 &0\end{array}\right) = \sigma^1[/tex]
One can construct the representation in higher dimensional even space recursively, by [tex]d \rightarrow d+2[/tex].
But now comes my question, for [tex]d = 6[/tex]
[tex]
\gamma^0 = i\sigma^2\otimes\textcolor{red}{(-\sigma^3)}\otimes\textcolor{red}{(-\sigma^3)}[/tex]
[tex]
\gamma^1 = \sigma^1 \otimes \textcolor{red}{(-\sigma^3)} \otimes \textcolor{red}{(-\sigma^3)}[/tex]
[tex]
\quad\quad\quad\vdots[/tex]
[tex]
\gamma^4 = I \otimes I \otimes \sigma^1[/tex]
[tex]
\gamma^5 = I \otimes I \otimes \sigma^2[/tex]
where [tex]I[/tex] is the 2 by 2 unit matrix.
My question is that,
why do we use [tex]\textcolor{red}{\sigma^3}[/tex]? I thought it should be the 2 by 2 identity matrix!
Anybody guides me through this?
Thank you so much for your help!