What is the construction of gamma matrices and spinors in higher dimensions?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ismaili
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimensions Spinors
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 4K views
ismaili
Messages
150
Reaction score
0
Dear guys,

I want to understand the spinors in various dimensions and Clifford algebra. I tried to read the appendix B of Polchinski's volume II of his string theory book. But it's hard for me to follow and I stuck in the very beginning. I will try to figure out the outline and post my questions later.

For now, I want to ask for very simple, introductory articles for the construction of gamma matrices and spinors in various dimensions. (Is the appendix B of Polchinski the simplest article among all?:blushing:)

Thanks for your help!

Ismaili
 
Physics news on Phys.org
haushofer said:
Maybe "A menu of supergravities" of Van Proeyen can help you. I found it quite understandable.
Excuse me,
I searched for this book in libraries nearby and on google but I couldn't find it?
Was this book published in english?

---
In the following, I briefly present the content and one of my question by which I stuck.

In the appendix B of Polchinski's string book.
One starts from the Clifford algebra in SO(d-1,1)
[tex]\{ \gamma^{\mu} , \gamma^\nu \} = 2\eta^{\mu\nu}[/tex]
In the even dimension, [tex]d = 2k+2[/tex], one can group the [tex]\gamma^\mu[/tex] into [tex]k+1[/tex] sets of anticommuting creation and annihilation operators,
[tex] \gamma^{0\pm} = \frac{1}{2} (\pm\gamma^0 + \gamma^1)<br /> \quad\quad \gamma^{a\pm} = \frac{1}{2}(\gamma^{2a} \pm i \gamma^{2a+1})[/tex]
where [tex]a=1,2,\cdots, k[/tex].
One then found that,
[tex] \{ \gamma^{a+}, \gamma^{b-} \} = \delta^{ab}\quad\quad<br /> \{ \gamma^{a+} , \gamma^{b+} \} = \{ \gamma^{a-} , \gamma^{b-} \} = 0[/tex]
That is, one finds that the gamma matrices can be grouped into the creation and annihilation operators of [tex]k[/tex] species of fermions. In particular, from
[tex](\gamma^{a-})^2 = 0[/tex]
one sees there exist a vacuum [tex]|\xi\rangle[/tex] annihilated by all [tex]\gamma^{a-}[/tex].
Thus, by this observation, one constructed the representation of Clifford algebra in the following space,
[tex] (\gamma^{k+})^{s_k+1/2}\cdots(\gamma^{0+})^{s_0+1/2} |xi\rangle[/tex]
, i.e. a space of the tensor product of [tex]k[/tex] species fermions; so, the dimension of this representation is [tex]2^{k+1}[/tex].

In [tex]d = 2[/tex], one can easily work out the matrix form of the gamma matrices,
[tex]\gamma^0 = \left(\begin{array}{cc}0 &1\\ -1 &0\end{array}\right) = i\sigma^2[/tex]
[tex]\gamma^1 = \left(\begin{array}{cc}0 &1\\ 1 &0\end{array}\right) = \sigma^1[/tex]

One can construct the representation in higher dimensional even space recursively, by [tex]d \rightarrow d+2[/tex]. But now comes my question, for [tex]d = 6[/tex]
[tex] \gamma^0 = i\sigma^2\otimes\textcolor{red}{(-\sigma^3)}\otimes\textcolor{red}{(-\sigma^3)}[/tex]
[tex] \gamma^1 = \sigma^1 \otimes \textcolor{red}{(-\sigma^3)} \otimes \textcolor{red}{(-\sigma^3)}[/tex]
[tex] \quad\quad\quad\vdots[/tex]
[tex] \gamma^4 = I \otimes I \otimes \sigma^1[/tex]
[tex] \gamma^5 = I \otimes I \otimes \sigma^2[/tex]
where [tex]I[/tex] is the 2 by 2 unit matrix.
My question is that, why do we use [tex]\textcolor{red}{\sigma^3}[/tex]? I thought it should be the 2 by 2 identity matrix!

Anybody guides me through this?
Thank you so much for your help!
 
ismaili said:
Excuse me,
I searched for this book in libraries nearby and on google but I couldn't find it?
Was this book published in english?

---
In the following, I briefly present the content and one of my question by which I stuck.

In the appendix B of Polchinski's string book.
One starts from the Clifford algebra in SO(d-1,1)
[tex]\{ \gamma^{\mu} , \gamma^\nu \} = 2\eta^{\mu\nu}[/tex]
In the even dimension, [tex]d = 2k+2[/tex], one can group the [tex]\gamma^\mu[/tex] into [tex]k+1[/tex] sets of anticommuting creation and annihilation operators,
[tex] \gamma^{0\pm} = \frac{1}{2} (\pm\gamma^0 + \gamma^1)<br /> \quad\quad \gamma^{a\pm} = \frac{1}{2}(\gamma^{2a} \pm i \gamma^{2a+1})[/tex]
where [tex]a=1,2,\cdots, k[/tex].
One then found that,
[tex] \{ \gamma^{a+}, \gamma^{b-} \} = \delta^{ab}\quad\quad<br /> \{ \gamma^{a+} , \gamma^{b+} \} = \{ \gamma^{a-} , \gamma^{b-} \} = 0[/tex]
That is, one finds that the gamma matrices can be grouped into the creation and annihilation operators of [tex]k[/tex] species of fermions. In particular, from
[tex](\gamma^{a-})^2 = 0[/tex]
one sees there exist a vacuum [tex]|\xi\rangle[/tex] annihilated by all [tex]\gamma^{a-}[/tex].
Thus, by this observation, one constructed the representation of Clifford algebra in the following space,
[tex] (\gamma^{k+})^{s_k+1/2}\cdots(\gamma^{0+})^{s_0+1/2} |xi\rangle[/tex]
, i.e. a space of the tensor product of [tex]k[/tex] species fermions; so, the dimension of this representation is [tex]2^{k+1}[/tex].

In [tex]d = 2[/tex], one can easily work out the matrix form of the gamma matrices,
[tex]\gamma^0 = \left(\begin{array}{cc}0 &1\\ -1 &0\end{array}\right) = i\sigma^2[/tex]
[tex]\gamma^1 = \left(\begin{array}{cc}0 &1\\ 1 &0\end{array}\right) = \sigma^1[/tex]

One can construct the representation in higher dimensional even space recursively, by [tex]d \rightarrow d+2[/tex]. But now comes my question, for [tex]d = 6[/tex]
[tex] \gamma^0 = i\sigma^2\otimes\textcolor{red}{(-\sigma^3)}\otimes\textcolor{red}{(-\sigma^3)}[/tex]
[tex] \gamma^1 = \sigma^1 \otimes \textcolor{red}{(-\sigma^3)} \otimes \textcolor{red}{(-\sigma^3)}[/tex]
[tex] \quad\quad\quad\vdots[/tex]
[tex] \gamma^4 = I \otimes I \otimes \sigma^1[/tex]
[tex] \gamma^5 = I \otimes I \otimes \sigma^2[/tex]
where [tex]I[/tex] is the 2 by 2 unit matrix.
My question is that, why do we use [tex]\textcolor{red}{\sigma^3}[/tex]? I thought it should be the 2 by 2 identity matrix!

Anybody guides me through this?
Thank you so much for your help!

I think I know the answer to the use of [tex]\sigma^3[/tex].
The gamma matrices in d = 2 invole only [tex]\sigma^1, \sigma^2[/tex].
When we add the spacetime dimension by 2,
in order to get the correct anti-commutation relations,
we have to tensor product the original gamma matrices by [tex]\sigma^3[/tex].

-----

After figuring out the construction of higher dimensional gamma matrices,
I was confused by the suddenly born conjugation matrix [tex]B[/tex] and charge conjugation matrix [tex]C[/tex]
...