MHB Splitting Fields - Dummit and Foote - Exercise 1, page 545

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
Dummit and Foote Exercise 1 on page 545 reads as follows:

Determine the splitting field and its degree over \mathbb{Q} for x^4 - 2.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I have started on the solution to this exercise as follows:

The two roots of x^4 - 2 are \alpha = \sqrt[4]{2} and \beta = \sqrt[4]{2}i

Thus the splitting field is \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}, \sqrt[4]{2}i )

We note that $$ \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}, \sqrt[4]{2}i ) = \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}, i ) $$ since the product of $$ \sqrt[4]{2} $$ and i must be in $$ \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}, i ) $$The element \alpha = \sqrt[4]{2} \in \mathbb{R} is algebraic over \mathbb{Q} and so m_{\alpha}(x) = m_{\sqrt[4]{2}}(x) = x^4 - 2 is the minimal polynomial for \alpha = \sqrt[4]{2} over \mathbb{Q}.

Thus the degree of \alpha = \sqrt[4]{2} over \mathbb{Q} is the degree of m_{\alpha}(x) = 4

Hence $$ [\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}) \ : \ \mathbb{Q}] $$ = 4
The element \beta = \sqrt[4]{2}i \in \mathbb{C} is also algebraic over \mathbb{Q} and so m_{\beta}(x) = m_{\sqrt[4]{2}i}(x) = x^4 - 2 is the minimal polynomial for \beta = \sqrt[4]{2}i over \mathbb{Q}.

Thus the degree of \beta = \sqrt[4]{2}i over \mathbb{Q} is the degree of m_{\beta}(x) = 4

Hence $$ [\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}i) \ : \ \mathbb{Q}] $$ = 4
But where to from here - need to find the degree of the splitting field.

Can someone please confirm that my reasoning above is valid and show me the way forward from here?

Peter[Note that this has also been posted on MHF]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
Dummit and Foote Exercise 1 on page 545 reads as follows:

Determine the splitting field and its degree over \mathbb{Q} for x^4 - 2.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I have started on the solution to this exercise as follows:

The two roots of x^4 - 2 are \alpha = \sqrt[4]{2} and \beta = \sqrt[4]{2}i

Thus the splitting field is \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}, \sqrt[4]{2}i )

We note that $$ \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}, \sqrt[4]{2}i ) = \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}, i ) $$ since the product of $$ \sqrt[4]{2} $$ and i must be in $$ \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}, i ) $$The element \alpha = \sqrt[4]{2} \in \mathbb{R} is algebraic over \mathbb{Q} and so m_{\alpha}(x) = m_{\sqrt[4]{2}}(x) = x^4 - 2 is the minimal polynomial for \alpha = \sqrt[4]{2} over \mathbb{Q}.

Thus the degree of \alpha = \sqrt[4]{2} over \mathbb{Q} is the degree of m_{\alpha}(x) = 4

Hence $$ [\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}) \ : \ \mathbb{Q}] $$ = 4
The element \beta = \sqrt[4]{2}i \in \mathbb{C} is also algebraic over \mathbb{Q} and so m_{\beta}(x) = m_{\sqrt[4]{2}i}(x) = x^4 - 2 is the minimal polynomial for \beta = \sqrt[4]{2}i over \mathbb{Q}.

Thus the degree of \beta = \sqrt[4]{2}i over \mathbb{Q} is the degree of m_{\beta}(x) = 4

Hence $$ [\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}i) \ : \ \mathbb{Q}] $$ = 4
But where to from here - need to find the degree of the splitting field.

Can someone please confirm that my reasoning above is valid and show me the way forward from here?

Peter[Note that this has also been posted on MHF]
You have correctly figured out that the splitting field for $x^4-2$ over $\mathbb Q$ is $\mathbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2},i)=E$ (say).

write $\mathbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2})=F$

Also, you know that $[F:\mathbb Q]=4$. Now if you know what is $[E:F]$ you can apply the tower law to get the answer. Now $E=F(i)$. So all you need to find is the minimal polynomial of $i$ over $F$. This polynomial can easily be seen to be $x^2+1$ and hence $[E:F]=2$.
 
Peter said:
Dummit and Foote Exercise 1 on page 545 reads as follows:

Determine the splitting field and its degree over \mathbb{Q} for x^4 - 2.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I have started on the solution to this exercise as follows:

The two roots of x^4 - 2 are \alpha = \sqrt[4]{2} and \beta = \sqrt[4]{2}i

A degree 4 polynomial has 4 roots. In this case, the complete factorization of $x^4 - 2$ in the splitting field is:

$x^4 - 2 = (x + \sqrt[4]{2})(x - \sqrt[4]{2})(x + i\sqrt[4]{2})(x - i\sqrt[4]{2})$

Thus the splitting field is \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}, \sqrt[4]{2}i )

It is more usual to call the splitting field: $\Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2},i)$. One can arrive at this splitting field like so:

Note that in $\Bbb Q(\sqrt{2}), x^4 - 2$ factors as:

$x^4 - 2 = (x^2 - \sqrt{2})(x^2 + \sqrt{2})$. This gives us a degree 2 extension of the rationals. Now $x^2 - 2$ is irreducible over $\Bbb Q$ (by Eisenstein), and is of degree 4, so since $\sqrt[4]{2}$ is a root of $x^4 - 2$, we conclude that $\Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2})$ is a degree 4 extension of $\Bbb Q$, which contains $\Bbb Q(\sqrt{2})$ as a subfield. But $\Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2})$ is a subfield of $\Bbb R$, which contains NO roots of $x^2 + \sqrt{2}$, so we conclude that $\Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2})$ is not the splitting field of $x^4 - 2$.

By the above, we also see that $x^2 + 1$ is irreducible over $\Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2})$, since if $x^2 + 1$ has no REAL roots, it certainly has no root in any subfield of $\Bbb R$ (we are assuming here that it can be taken as given $\sqrt[4]{2} \in \Bbb R$, a proof of which would be too long a digression, but can be shown by defining $\sqrt[4]{2}$ as the Dedekind cut:

$\{q \in \Bbb Q:q < 0, \text{or } q^4 - 2 < 0\}$).

Thus $[\Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2},i):\Bbb Q] = [\Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2},i):\Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2})]\ast[\Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2}):\Bbb Q] = 2 \ast 4 = 8$

We note that $$ \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}, \sqrt[4]{2}i ) = \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}, i ) $$ since the product of $$ \sqrt[4]{2} $$ and i must be in $$ \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}, i ) $$

This only shows one inclusion, to show the other you must show that $i \in \Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2},i\sqrt[4]{2})$, which is easy:

$i = \frac{1}{2}(\sqrt[4]{2})^3(i\sqrt[4]{2})$
The element \alpha = \sqrt[4]{2} \in \mathbb{R} is algebraic over \mathbb{Q} and so m_{\alpha}(x) = m_{\sqrt[4]{2}}(x) = x^4 - 2 is the minimal polynomial for \alpha = \sqrt[4]{2} over \mathbb{Q}.

Thus the degree of \alpha = \sqrt[4]{2} over \mathbb{Q} is the degree of m_{\alpha}(x) = 4

Hence $$ [\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}) \ : \ \mathbb{Q}] $$ = 4
The element \beta = \sqrt[4]{2}i \in \mathbb{C} is also algebraic over \mathbb{Q} and so m_{\beta}(x) = m_{\sqrt[4]{2}i}(x) = x^4 - 2 is the minimal polynomial for \beta = \sqrt[4]{2}i over \mathbb{Q}.

Thus the degree of \beta = \sqrt[4]{2}i over \mathbb{Q} is the degree of m_{\beta}(x) = 4

Hence $$ [\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}i) \ : \ \mathbb{Q}] $$ = 4
But where to from here - need to find the degree of the splitting field.

Can someone please confirm that my reasoning above is valid and show me the way forward from here?

Peter[Note that this has also been posted on MHF]

I no longer visit MHF, the malware and the bot infestation is too sad to endure.
 
Deveno said:
A degree 4 polynomial has 4 roots. In this case, the complete factorization of $x^4 - 2$ in the splitting field is:

$x^4 - 2 = (x + \sqrt[4]{2})(x - \sqrt[4]{2})(x + i\sqrt[4]{2})(x - i\sqrt[4]{2})$
It is more usual to call the splitting field: $\Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2},i)$. One can arrive at this splitting field like so:

Note that in $\Bbb Q(\sqrt{2}), x^4 - 2$ factors as:

$x^4 - 2 = (x^2 - \sqrt{2})(x^2 + \sqrt{2})$. This gives us a degree 2 extension of the rationals. Now $x^2 - 2$ is irreducible over $\Bbb Q$ (by Eisenstein), and is of degree 4, so since $\sqrt[4]{2}$ is a root of $x^4 - 2$, we conclude that $\Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2})$ is a degree 4 extension of $\Bbb Q$, which contains $\Bbb Q(\sqrt{2})$ as a subfield. But $\Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2})$ is a subfield of $\Bbb R$, which contains NO roots of $x^2 + \sqrt{2}$, so we conclude that $\Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2})$ is not the splitting field of $x^4 - 2$.

By the above, we also see that $x^2 + 1$ is irreducible over $\Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2})$, since if $x^2 + 1$ has no REAL roots, it certainly has no root in any subfield of $\Bbb R$ (we are assuming here that it can be taken as given $\sqrt[4]{2} \in \Bbb R$, a proof of which would be too long a digression, but can be shown by defining $\sqrt[4]{2}$ as the Dedekind cut:

$\{q \in \Bbb Q:q < 0, \text{or } q^4 - 2 < 0\}$).

Thus $[\Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2},i):\Bbb Q] = [\Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2},i):\Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2})]\ast[\Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2}):\Bbb Q] = 2 \ast 4 = 8$
This only shows one inclusion, to show the other you must show that $i \in \Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2},i\sqrt[4]{2})$, which is easy:

$i = \frac{1}{2}(\sqrt[4]{2})^3(i\sqrt[4]{2})$

I no longer visit MHF, the malware and the bot infestation is too sad to endure.
Thanks Deveno, you give details of a number of points that are extremely important to understanding the exercise and the theory in general

appreciate such detailed help.

Peter
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top