MHB Splitting Fields - Dummit and Foote - Exercise 1, page 545

Click For Summary
The splitting field for the polynomial x^4 - 2 over \mathbb{Q} is determined to be \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}, i). The minimal polynomial for the root \alpha = \sqrt[4]{2} is x^4 - 2, indicating that the degree of \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}) over \mathbb{Q} is 4. The extension \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}, i) is found to have a degree of 2 over \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}), since x^2 + 1 is irreducible in that field. Consequently, the overall degree of the splitting field over \mathbb{Q} is 8, calculated using the tower law.
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
Dummit and Foote Exercise 1 on page 545 reads as follows:

Determine the splitting field and its degree over \mathbb{Q} for x^4 - 2.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I have started on the solution to this exercise as follows:

The two roots of x^4 - 2 are \alpha = \sqrt[4]{2} and \beta = \sqrt[4]{2}i

Thus the splitting field is \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}, \sqrt[4]{2}i )

We note that $$ \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}, \sqrt[4]{2}i ) = \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}, i ) $$ since the product of $$ \sqrt[4]{2} $$ and i must be in $$ \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}, i ) $$The element \alpha = \sqrt[4]{2} \in \mathbb{R} is algebraic over \mathbb{Q} and so m_{\alpha}(x) = m_{\sqrt[4]{2}}(x) = x^4 - 2 is the minimal polynomial for \alpha = \sqrt[4]{2} over \mathbb{Q}.

Thus the degree of \alpha = \sqrt[4]{2} over \mathbb{Q} is the degree of m_{\alpha}(x) = 4

Hence $$ [\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}) \ : \ \mathbb{Q}] $$ = 4
The element \beta = \sqrt[4]{2}i \in \mathbb{C} is also algebraic over \mathbb{Q} and so m_{\beta}(x) = m_{\sqrt[4]{2}i}(x) = x^4 - 2 is the minimal polynomial for \beta = \sqrt[4]{2}i over \mathbb{Q}.

Thus the degree of \beta = \sqrt[4]{2}i over \mathbb{Q} is the degree of m_{\beta}(x) = 4

Hence $$ [\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}i) \ : \ \mathbb{Q}] $$ = 4
But where to from here - need to find the degree of the splitting field.

Can someone please confirm that my reasoning above is valid and show me the way forward from here?

Peter[Note that this has also been posted on MHF]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
Dummit and Foote Exercise 1 on page 545 reads as follows:

Determine the splitting field and its degree over \mathbb{Q} for x^4 - 2.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I have started on the solution to this exercise as follows:

The two roots of x^4 - 2 are \alpha = \sqrt[4]{2} and \beta = \sqrt[4]{2}i

Thus the splitting field is \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}, \sqrt[4]{2}i )

We note that $$ \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}, \sqrt[4]{2}i ) = \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}, i ) $$ since the product of $$ \sqrt[4]{2} $$ and i must be in $$ \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}, i ) $$The element \alpha = \sqrt[4]{2} \in \mathbb{R} is algebraic over \mathbb{Q} and so m_{\alpha}(x) = m_{\sqrt[4]{2}}(x) = x^4 - 2 is the minimal polynomial for \alpha = \sqrt[4]{2} over \mathbb{Q}.

Thus the degree of \alpha = \sqrt[4]{2} over \mathbb{Q} is the degree of m_{\alpha}(x) = 4

Hence $$ [\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}) \ : \ \mathbb{Q}] $$ = 4
The element \beta = \sqrt[4]{2}i \in \mathbb{C} is also algebraic over \mathbb{Q} and so m_{\beta}(x) = m_{\sqrt[4]{2}i}(x) = x^4 - 2 is the minimal polynomial for \beta = \sqrt[4]{2}i over \mathbb{Q}.

Thus the degree of \beta = \sqrt[4]{2}i over \mathbb{Q} is the degree of m_{\beta}(x) = 4

Hence $$ [\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}i) \ : \ \mathbb{Q}] $$ = 4
But where to from here - need to find the degree of the splitting field.

Can someone please confirm that my reasoning above is valid and show me the way forward from here?

Peter[Note that this has also been posted on MHF]
You have correctly figured out that the splitting field for $x^4-2$ over $\mathbb Q$ is $\mathbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2},i)=E$ (say).

write $\mathbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2})=F$

Also, you know that $[F:\mathbb Q]=4$. Now if you know what is $[E:F]$ you can apply the tower law to get the answer. Now $E=F(i)$. So all you need to find is the minimal polynomial of $i$ over $F$. This polynomial can easily be seen to be $x^2+1$ and hence $[E:F]=2$.
 
Peter said:
Dummit and Foote Exercise 1 on page 545 reads as follows:

Determine the splitting field and its degree over \mathbb{Q} for x^4 - 2.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I have started on the solution to this exercise as follows:

The two roots of x^4 - 2 are \alpha = \sqrt[4]{2} and \beta = \sqrt[4]{2}i

A degree 4 polynomial has 4 roots. In this case, the complete factorization of $x^4 - 2$ in the splitting field is:

$x^4 - 2 = (x + \sqrt[4]{2})(x - \sqrt[4]{2})(x + i\sqrt[4]{2})(x - i\sqrt[4]{2})$

Thus the splitting field is \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}, \sqrt[4]{2}i )

It is more usual to call the splitting field: $\Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2},i)$. One can arrive at this splitting field like so:

Note that in $\Bbb Q(\sqrt{2}), x^4 - 2$ factors as:

$x^4 - 2 = (x^2 - \sqrt{2})(x^2 + \sqrt{2})$. This gives us a degree 2 extension of the rationals. Now $x^2 - 2$ is irreducible over $\Bbb Q$ (by Eisenstein), and is of degree 4, so since $\sqrt[4]{2}$ is a root of $x^4 - 2$, we conclude that $\Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2})$ is a degree 4 extension of $\Bbb Q$, which contains $\Bbb Q(\sqrt{2})$ as a subfield. But $\Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2})$ is a subfield of $\Bbb R$, which contains NO roots of $x^2 + \sqrt{2}$, so we conclude that $\Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2})$ is not the splitting field of $x^4 - 2$.

By the above, we also see that $x^2 + 1$ is irreducible over $\Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2})$, since if $x^2 + 1$ has no REAL roots, it certainly has no root in any subfield of $\Bbb R$ (we are assuming here that it can be taken as given $\sqrt[4]{2} \in \Bbb R$, a proof of which would be too long a digression, but can be shown by defining $\sqrt[4]{2}$ as the Dedekind cut:

$\{q \in \Bbb Q:q < 0, \text{or } q^4 - 2 < 0\}$).

Thus $[\Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2},i):\Bbb Q] = [\Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2},i):\Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2})]\ast[\Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2}):\Bbb Q] = 2 \ast 4 = 8$

We note that $$ \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}, \sqrt[4]{2}i ) = \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}, i ) $$ since the product of $$ \sqrt[4]{2} $$ and i must be in $$ \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}, i ) $$

This only shows one inclusion, to show the other you must show that $i \in \Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2},i\sqrt[4]{2})$, which is easy:

$i = \frac{1}{2}(\sqrt[4]{2})^3(i\sqrt[4]{2})$
The element \alpha = \sqrt[4]{2} \in \mathbb{R} is algebraic over \mathbb{Q} and so m_{\alpha}(x) = m_{\sqrt[4]{2}}(x) = x^4 - 2 is the minimal polynomial for \alpha = \sqrt[4]{2} over \mathbb{Q}.

Thus the degree of \alpha = \sqrt[4]{2} over \mathbb{Q} is the degree of m_{\alpha}(x) = 4

Hence $$ [\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}) \ : \ \mathbb{Q}] $$ = 4
The element \beta = \sqrt[4]{2}i \in \mathbb{C} is also algebraic over \mathbb{Q} and so m_{\beta}(x) = m_{\sqrt[4]{2}i}(x) = x^4 - 2 is the minimal polynomial for \beta = \sqrt[4]{2}i over \mathbb{Q}.

Thus the degree of \beta = \sqrt[4]{2}i over \mathbb{Q} is the degree of m_{\beta}(x) = 4

Hence $$ [\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]{2}i) \ : \ \mathbb{Q}] $$ = 4
But where to from here - need to find the degree of the splitting field.

Can someone please confirm that my reasoning above is valid and show me the way forward from here?

Peter[Note that this has also been posted on MHF]

I no longer visit MHF, the malware and the bot infestation is too sad to endure.
 
Deveno said:
A degree 4 polynomial has 4 roots. In this case, the complete factorization of $x^4 - 2$ in the splitting field is:

$x^4 - 2 = (x + \sqrt[4]{2})(x - \sqrt[4]{2})(x + i\sqrt[4]{2})(x - i\sqrt[4]{2})$
It is more usual to call the splitting field: $\Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2},i)$. One can arrive at this splitting field like so:

Note that in $\Bbb Q(\sqrt{2}), x^4 - 2$ factors as:

$x^4 - 2 = (x^2 - \sqrt{2})(x^2 + \sqrt{2})$. This gives us a degree 2 extension of the rationals. Now $x^2 - 2$ is irreducible over $\Bbb Q$ (by Eisenstein), and is of degree 4, so since $\sqrt[4]{2}$ is a root of $x^4 - 2$, we conclude that $\Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2})$ is a degree 4 extension of $\Bbb Q$, which contains $\Bbb Q(\sqrt{2})$ as a subfield. But $\Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2})$ is a subfield of $\Bbb R$, which contains NO roots of $x^2 + \sqrt{2}$, so we conclude that $\Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2})$ is not the splitting field of $x^4 - 2$.

By the above, we also see that $x^2 + 1$ is irreducible over $\Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2})$, since if $x^2 + 1$ has no REAL roots, it certainly has no root in any subfield of $\Bbb R$ (we are assuming here that it can be taken as given $\sqrt[4]{2} \in \Bbb R$, a proof of which would be too long a digression, but can be shown by defining $\sqrt[4]{2}$ as the Dedekind cut:

$\{q \in \Bbb Q:q < 0, \text{or } q^4 - 2 < 0\}$).

Thus $[\Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2},i):\Bbb Q] = [\Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2},i):\Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2})]\ast[\Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2}):\Bbb Q] = 2 \ast 4 = 8$
This only shows one inclusion, to show the other you must show that $i \in \Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]{2},i\sqrt[4]{2})$, which is easy:

$i = \frac{1}{2}(\sqrt[4]{2})^3(i\sqrt[4]{2})$

I no longer visit MHF, the malware and the bot infestation is too sad to endure.
Thanks Deveno, you give details of a number of points that are extremely important to understanding the exercise and the theory in general

appreciate such detailed help.

Peter
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K