Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
- 3,920
- 48
I am reading Dummit and Foote, Chapter 13 - Field Theory.
I am currently studying Section 13.4 : Splitting Fields and Algebraic Closures ... ...
I need some help with an aspect of Example 3 of Section 13.4 ... ...
Example 3 reads as follows:
View attachment 6603
View attachment 6604
In the above text by Dummit and Foote, we read the following:
" ... ... Since $$\sqrt{ -3 }$$ satisfies the equation $$x^2 + 3 = 0$$ the degree of this extension over $$\mathbb{Q} ( \sqrt [3] {2} )$$ is at most $$2$$, hence must be $$2$$ since we observed above that $$\mathbb{Q} ( \sqrt [3] {2} ) $$ is not the splitting field ... ... "I do not understand why the degree of the extension $$K$$ over $$\mathbb{Q} ( \sqrt [3] {2} )$$ must be exactly $$2$$ ... ... why does $$\mathbb{Q} ( \sqrt [3] {2} )$$ not being the splitting field ensure this ... ... ?
Can someone please give a simple and complete explanation ...
Hope someone can help ...
Peter
I am currently studying Section 13.4 : Splitting Fields and Algebraic Closures ... ...
I need some help with an aspect of Example 3 of Section 13.4 ... ...
Example 3 reads as follows:
View attachment 6603
View attachment 6604
In the above text by Dummit and Foote, we read the following:
" ... ... Since $$\sqrt{ -3 }$$ satisfies the equation $$x^2 + 3 = 0$$ the degree of this extension over $$\mathbb{Q} ( \sqrt [3] {2} )$$ is at most $$2$$, hence must be $$2$$ since we observed above that $$\mathbb{Q} ( \sqrt [3] {2} ) $$ is not the splitting field ... ... "I do not understand why the degree of the extension $$K$$ over $$\mathbb{Q} ( \sqrt [3] {2} )$$ must be exactly $$2$$ ... ... why does $$\mathbb{Q} ( \sqrt [3] {2} )$$ not being the splitting field ensure this ... ... ?
Can someone please give a simple and complete explanation ...
Hope someone can help ...
Peter