Spot the error (circumference of ellipse)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nonequilibrium
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ellipse Error
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the incorrect calculation of the circumference of an ellipse with a semi-major axis of 2 and a semi-minor axis of 1, which the author claims to be 4π. The proof presented utilizes the Dirac delta function, leading to confusion and misinterpretation of the mathematical principles involved. The correct formula for the circumference of an ellipse is not 4π, as derived from the integral approach shown. This highlights the importance of using appropriate mathematical tools and methods for accurate results in geometry.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ellipse geometry and properties
  • Familiarity with integral calculus
  • Knowledge of the Dirac delta function and its applications
  • Basic principles of mathematical proofs and derivations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the formula for the circumference of an ellipse, specifically the Ramanujan approximation
  • Learn about the applications and implications of the Dirac delta function in calculus
  • Explore integral calculus techniques for calculating areas and circumferences
  • Review common pitfalls in mathematical proofs and how to avoid them
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone interested in advanced geometry and calculus, particularly those looking to deepen their understanding of ellipses and integral methods.

nonequilibrium
Messages
1,412
Reaction score
2
Spot the error:

The circumference of an ellipse with semi-major axis = 2 and semi-minor axis = 1 (i.e. \left( \frac{x}{2} \right)^2 + y^2 = 1) is 4 \pi. Proof:

\textrm{circumference} = \iint_{\mathbb R^2}{ \delta \left( \left( \frac{x}{2} \right)^2 + y^2 - 1 \right) } \mathrm d x \mathrm d y = 2 \iint_{\mathbb R^2}{ \delta \left( \left( \frac{x}{2} \right)^2 + y^2 - 1 \right) } \mathrm d \frac{x}{2} \mathrm d y = 2 \iint_{\mathbb R^2}{ \delta \left( x^2 + y^2 - 1 \right) } \mathrm d x \mathrm d y = 2 \times 2 \pi = 4 \pi

(I couldn't post this in the Math forum since they would just yell at me for using the dirac delta, and it's also not homework as I know the answer.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I could not see the mistake yet.. Interesting way to calculate the circumference :)
 
mr. vodka said:
(I couldn't post this in the Math forum since they would just yell at me for using the dirac delta

Well, I just moved it to the math forum. So prepare for some yelling :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K