Spotting Errors in Transverse & Longitudinal Accelerations

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the decomposition of a particle's acceleration into longitudinal and transverse components based on its velocity. The user derived the x-components of these acceleration vectors using the dot product and applied gamma factors to relate them to longitudinal and transverse masses. They attempted to equate two formulas for the x-component of force derived from momentum differentiation but found discrepancies. Ultimately, the user identified a mistake in their calculations, realizing that the second equation should involve multiplication by gamma cube rather than division. This highlights the importance of careful application of relativistic factors in physics equations.
greswd
Messages
764
Reaction score
20
Let's say you know all 3 cartesian components of a particle's velocity and all 3 for it's acceleration.

You can split the acceleration vector into two vectors, one parallel (longitudinal) to the velocity vector and one perpendicular (transverse) to the velocity vector.

Then, I found the x-components of both acceleration vectors in terms of the 6 variables listed at the start. That would be the component of each acceleration vector parallel to the x-axis. I used the dot product to derive it.

As you can see below, I multiplied the transverse-x acceleration component by gamma and the longitudinal-x acceleration component by gamma cube. These are the formulas for the longitudinal and transverse masses.

I can get a formula for the x-component of the Force.
errors.png
In order to get the second formula, I differentiated the x-component of the 3-momentum with respect to time.
I expected both equations to be equivalent, but try as I might, I can't make them equal.Can you help me spot the error(s) in my formulas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry, it didn't help me at all.

Anyway, I've discovered my careless mistake. It is supposed to be multiplied, not divided, by gamma cube for the second equation.
 
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K